Mass lesions classification in digital mammography using optimal subset of BI-RADS and gray level features

Proceedings of the IEEE/EMBS Region 8 International Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, ITAB

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 99-102

  Saejoon, Kim ^a   Sejong, Yoon ^a  

^a Sogang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); MAMMOGRAPHY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; X RAY SCREENS;

BI-RADS; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHIES; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; GRAY-LEVEL; MASS LESION; OPTIMAL SUBSETS; RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 50049087933     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITAB.2007.4407354     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Elmore et al., Screening for breast cancer. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(10): 1245-1256, 2005.
2. J.A. Bker et al., Breast Cancer: Prediction with Artificial Neural Network Based on Bi-Rads Standardized Lexicon, Radiology, 196: 817-822, 1995.
3. D.B. Fogel et al. Linear and Neural Models for Classifying Breast Masses. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 17(3): 485-488, 1998.
4. I. El-Naqa et al., A Support. Vector Machine Approach for Detection of Microcalcifications, IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging. 21(12): 1552-1563, 2002.
5. W. Land Jr. et al., Applying support vector machines to breast cancer diagonosis using screen film mammogram data. IEEE Symp. on CBMS '04, 2004.
6. L. Wei et al., A Study on Several Machine-Learning Methods for Classification of Malignant and Benign Clustered Microcalcifications," IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 24:371-380, 2005.
7. L. Isaac et al, Computerized classification can reduce unnecessary biopsies in Bi-Rads category 4A lesions. International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 76-83, 2006.
8. Y. Jiang et al., Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology, 220:787-794, 2001.
9. M. Heath et al., Current status of the digital database of screening mammography. Digital Mammography, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 457-460, 1998.
10. I. Guyon et al. Gene selection for cancer classification using SVM. Mach. Learning, 46:389-422, 2002.
11. X. Zhang et al. Recursive SVM feature selection and sample classification for mass-spectrometry and microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(197), 2006.
12. Breast Imaging- Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 1998.
13. S.G. Orel et al, Bi-Rads categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology, 211:845-850, 1999.
14. J.Y. Lo et al., Computer-aided classification of breast microcalcification clusters: Merging of features from image processing and radiologists.
15. P. Zhang et al., Neural vs. statistical classification in conjunction with genetic algorithm based feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(7): 909-919, 2005.
16. V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, New York, 1998.