Rehabilitation of balance after stroke with multisensorial training: A single-blind randomized controlled study

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 468-476

  Yelnik, Alain P ^a   Le Breton, Frederique ^a   Colle, Florence M ^a   Bonan, Isabelle V ^a   Hugeron, Caroline ^b   Egal, Véronique ^a   Lebomin, Elizabeth ^b   Regnaux, Jean Philippe ^b   Pérennou, Dominic ^c   Vicaut, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^c DIJON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Balance; Functional independence; Rehabilitation; Sensory plasticity; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BALANCE DISORDER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GAIT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOCOMOTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTISENSORIAL TRAINING; NEURODEVELOPMENTAL THEORY BASED TREATMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; WALKING SPEED;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; EXERCISE; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTURAL BALANCE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SENSATION DISORDERS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 50049085139     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308315996     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Tutuarima JA, van der Meulen JH, de Haan RJ, van Straten A., Limburg M. Risk factors for falls of hospitalized stroke patients. Stroke. 1997 ; 28: 297-301.
2. Teasell R., MacRae M., Foley N., Bhardwaj A. The incidence and consequences of falls in stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation: factors associated with high risk. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 ; 83: 329-333.
3. Perennou D., El Fatimi A., Masmoudi M., et al. Incidence, circumstances and consequences of falls in patients undergoing rehabilitation after a first stroke. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 ; 48: 138-145.
4. Forster A., Young J. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. BMJ. 1995 ; 311: 83-85.
5. Nyberg L., Gustafson Y. Fall prediction index for patients in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1997 ; 28: 716-721.
6. Lamb SE, Ferrucci L., Volapto S., Fried LP, Guralnik JM Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke: the Women's Health and Aging Study. Stroke. 2003 ; 34: 494-501.
7. Tyson SF, Hanley M., Chillala J., Selley A., Tallis R. The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke: predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 341-346.
8. Bonan IV, Gellez-Leman MC, Legargasson JF, Guichard JP, Yelnik AP Evolution of subjective visual vertical perturbation after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20: 484-491.
9. Bonan IV, Hubeaux K., Gellez-Leman MC, Guichard JP, Vicaut E., Yelnik AP Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 ; 78: 49-55.
10. Perennou DA, Amblard B., Leblond C., Pelissier J. Biased postural vertical in humans with hemispheric cerebral lesions. Neurosci Lett. 1998 ; 252: 75-78.
11. Bonan IV, Colle FM, Guichard JP, et al. Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part I: balance on dynamic posturography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 268-273.
12. Bonan IV, Yelnik AP, Colle FM, et al. Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part II: effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program with visual cue deprivation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 274-278.
13. Gauthier L., Dehaut F., Joanette Y. The bells test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989 ; 11: 49-53.
14. Collin C., Wade DT Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 ; 53: 576-576.
15. Bobath B. Hémiplégie de l'adulte, bilans et traitement. Paris, France: Masson ; 1990.
16. Stevenson TJ, Garland SJ Standing balance during internally produced perturbations in subjects with hemiplegia: validation of the balance scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 ; 77: 656-662.
17. Clark S., Rose DJ, Fujimoto K. Generalizability of the limits of stability test in the evaluation of dynamic balance among older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 ; 78: 1078-1084.
18. Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther. 1990 ; 70: 340-347.
19. Bessou P., Dupui P., Montoya R., Pagès B. Simultaneous recording of longitudinal displacements of both feet during human walking. J Physiol. 1989 ; 83: 102-110.
20. Granger CV, Hamilton BB The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1990. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 ; 71: 33-38.
21. Bucquet D., Condon S., Ritchie K. The French version of the Nottingham Health Profile. A comparison of weights with those of the source version. Soc Sci Med. 1990 ; 30: 829-835.
22. Noether GE Sample size determination for some common non-parametric statistics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987 ; 82: 645-647.
23. Nashner LM, Peters JF Dynamic posturography in the diagnosis and management of dizziness and balance disorders. Neurol Clin. 1990 ; 8: 331-349.
24. Azulay JP, Mesure S., Amblard B., Pouget J. Increased visual dependence in Parkinson's disease. Percept Mot Skills. 2002 ; 95: 1106-1114.
25. Guerraz M., Yardley L., Bertholon P., et al. Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain. 2001 ; 124: 1646-1656.
26. Suarez H., Muse P., Suarez A., Arocena M. Assessment of the risk of fall, related to visual stimulation, in patients with central vestibular disorders. Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 ; 121: 220-224.
27. Lord SR, Webster IW Visual field dependence in elderly fallers and non-fallers. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1990 ; 31: 267-277.
28. Yelnik AP, Kassouha A., Bonan IV, et al. Postural visual dependence after recent stroke: assessment by optokinetic stimulation. Gait Posture. 2006 ; 24: 262-269.
29. Winstein CJ, Gradner ER, McNeal DR, Barto PS, Nicholson DE Standing balance training: effect on balance and locomotion in hemiparetic adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 ; 70: 755-762.
30. Lee MY, Wong M.K., Tang FT Clinical evaluation of a new biofeedback standing balance training device. J Med Eng Technol. 1996 ; 20: 60-66.
31. Sackley CM, Lincoln NB Single blind randomized controlled trial of visual feedback after stroke: effects on stance symmetry and function. Disabil Rehabil. 1997 ; 12: 536-546.
32. Kerdoncuff V., Duruffe A., Petrilli S., et al. Interest of visual biofeedback training in rehabilitation of balance after stroke. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004 ; 47: 169-176.
33. de Haart M., Geurts AC, Dault MC, Nienhuis B., Duysens J. Restoration of weight-shifting capacity in patients with postacute stroke: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 ; 86: 755-762.
34. Cheng PT, Wang CM, Chung CY, Chen CL Effects of visual feedback rhythmic weight-shift training on hemiplegic stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2004 ; 18: 747-753.
35. Barclay-Goddard R., Stevenson T., Poluha W., Moffatt MEK, Taback SP Force platform feedback for standing balance training after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 ;( 4 ):CD004129.
36. Van Peppen RPS, Kortsmit M., Lindeman E., Kwakkel G. Effects of visual feedback therapy on postural control in bilateral standing after stroke: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2006 ; 38: 3-9.
37. Baccini M., Paci M., Rinaldi L. The scale for contraversive pushing: a reliability and validity study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20: 468-472.
38. Dobkin B. Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 3-13.