Performance of simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation in a sample of women with suspected osteoporosis in the turkish population

Rheumatology International

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 825-830

  Karkucak, M ^a   Capkin, E ^a,b   Kerimoglu, S ^a   Serdaroglu, M ^a   Topbas, M ^a   Yildiz, H ^c   Guler, M ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Yavuz Selim Bone Disease and Rehabilitation Hospital   (Turkey)

^c Servergazi State Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Osteoporosis; Postmenopausal women; Simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation; Turkish population

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROC CURVE; TURKEY;

EID: 49949151961     PISSN: 01728172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-008-0546-3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Consensus Development Conference (1993) Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646-50
2. Devogelaer JP (1998) A Risk-Benefit assessment of Alendronate in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis. Drug Saf Au 19(2):141-154
3. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Bruckhardt P et al (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:390-406
4. Melton LJ, Kan SH, Wahner HW et al (1988) Lifetime fracture risk: an approach to hip fracture risk assessment based on bone mineral density and age. J Clin Epidemiol 41(10):985-994
5. Gourlay ML, Miller WC, Richy F et al (2005) Performance of osteoporosis risk assessment tools in postmenopausal women aged 45-64 years. Osteoporos Int 16(8):921-7
6. Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J et al (1999) Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 4(1):37-48
7. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29-36
8. Salaffi F,Silveri F, Stancati A et al (2005) Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Clin Rheumatol 24:203-211
9. Discigil G, Gemalmaz A, Tekin N et al (2006) Profile of menopausal women in a west Anatolian rural region sample. Maturitas 55(3):247-54
10. BenSedrine W, Devogealer P, Kaufman M et al (2001) Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in a sample of white women from Belgium. Bone 29(4):374-380
11. Von Mühlen D, Lunde VA, Barrett-Connor E et al (1999) Evaluation of simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in older caucasian women: the rancho bernardo study. Osteoporos Int 10:79-84
12. Ungar JW, Josse R, Lee S et al (2000) The Canadian SCORE questionnaire: optimizing the use of technology for low bone density assessment. simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimate. J Clin Densitom 3(3):269-80
13. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM (1999) Validation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) for patient for bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 10:79-84