Understanding the semantics of data provenance to support active conceptual modeling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4512 LNCS, Issue , 2008, Pages 17-29

  Ram, Sudha ^a   Liu, Jun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; DATA CREATION; DATA PROVENANCE; DEAD ENDS; HOME LAND SECURITY; LIFE-CYCLE; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; ACTIVE CONCEPTUAL MODELS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DEAD-ENDS;

EDUCATION; INFORMATION THEORY; SEMANTICS; DATA MINING;

DATA PROCESSING; DATA HANDLING;

EID: 49949112653     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77503-4_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Pearson, D.: The Grid: Requirements for Establishing the Provenance of Derived. Data. In: Workshop on. Data Derivation and Provenance, Chicago, Illinois (2002)
2. Buneman, P., Khanna, S., Tan, W.C.: Data Provenance: Some Basic Issues. In: Kapoor, S., Prasad, S. (eds.) FSTTCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1974, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
3. Frew, J., Bose, R.: Earth System Science Workbench: A Data Management Infrastructure for Earth Science Products. In: The 13th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Fairfax, VA (2001)
4. Buneman, P., Khanna, S., Tan, W.C.: Why and Where: A Characterization of Data Provenance. In: Van den Bussche, J., Vianu, V. (eds.) ICDT 2001. LNCS, vol. 1973, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
5. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. In: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, vol. 3, Reidel, Boston, MA (1977)
6. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. In: Ontology II: A World of Systems, vol. 4, Reidel, Boston, MA (1979)
7. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal 5 (1995)
8. Davis, L.: Theory of action. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1979)
9. Chisholm, R.: The Agent as Cause. In: Brand, M., Walton, D. (eds.) Action Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975)
10. Ram, S.: Intelligent Database Design Using the Unifying Semantic Model. Information and Management 29, 191-206 (1995)
11. Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model - toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1, 9-36 (1976)
12. Snodgrass, R.T., Ahn, I.: Temporal Databases. Computer 19, 35-42 (1986)
13. Khatri, V., Ram, S., Snodgrass, R.: Augmenting a Conceptual Model with Geospatiotemporal Annotations. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng. 16, 1324-1338 (2004)
14. Koubarakis, M., Plexousakis, D.: A formal framework for business process modeling and design. Information Systems 27, 299-319 (2002)
15. Curtis, B., Kellner, M., Over, J.: Process modeling. Communication of ACM 35, 75-90 (1992)
16. Georgeff, M., Pell, B., Pollack, M., Tambe, M., Wooldridge, M.: The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency. In: The 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Agent: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Paris, France (1999)
17. Konolige, K., Pollack, M.E.: A Representationalist Theory of Intention. In: IJCAI 1993. The Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1993)
18. Allen, G., March, S.: Modeling Temporal Dynamics for Business Systems. Journal of Database Management 14, 21-36 (2003)
19. Chen, P.P., Thalheim, B., Wong, L.: Future direction, of conceptual modeling. In: Chen, P.P., Akoka, J., Kangassalu, H., Thalheim, B. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 1565, pp. 294-308. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
20. English, L.: Information Quality: Critical Ingredient for National Security. Journal of Database Management 16, 18-32 (2005)