Forest fuel piles as ecological traps for saproxylic beetles in oak

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 348-357

  Hedin, Jonas ^a   Isacsson, Gunnar ^b   Jonsell, Mats ^c   Komonen, Atte ^c  

^a County Administration of Kronoberg ^*  (Sweden)

^b Swedish Forest Agency   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Forest fuel; Logging residues; Oak; Restoration; Saproxylic; Slash

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTRY; FUELS; PILES; WOOD;

BIOENERGY; BOTTOM LAYERS; BROAD-LEAVED FORESTS; FOREST FUEL; IN-SITU; LOGGING RESIDUES; OAK; OAK WOOD; PARTIAL CUTTINGS; RESTORATION; SAPROXYLIC; SAPROXYLIC BEETLES; SLASH; SPECIES COMPOSITIONS; SPECIES DENSITY; STAND STRUCTURES;

IN SITU PROCESSING;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOLOGY; FORESTS; FUELS; INSECTS; LOGGING; QUERCUS; RESTORATION; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; WOOD;

COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 49949101654     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580802269991     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Battin, J. (2004). When good animals love bad habitats: Ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conservation Biology, 18, 1482-1491.
2. Berg, Å., Ehnström, B., Gustafsson, L., Hallingbäck, T., Jonsell, M. & Weslien, J. (1994). Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: Distribution and habitat associations. Conservation Biology, 8, 718-731.
3. Best, L. B. (1986). Conservation tillage: Ecological traps for nesting birds? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 14, 308-317.
4. Bollinger, E. K., Bollinger, P. B. & Gavin, T. A. (1990). Effects of hay-cropping eastern populations of the bobolink. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 18, 142-150.
5. Colwell, R. K. (2006). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.0. http://purl.oclc.org/ estimates
6. Delibes, M., Gaona, P. & Ferreras, P. (2001). Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. The American Naturalist, 158, 277-285.
7. Donovan, T. M. & Thompson, F. R. III (2001). Modeling the ecological trap hypothesis: A habitat and demographic analysis for migrant songbirds. Ecological Applications, 11, 871-882.
8. Dwernychuk, L. W. & Boag, D. A. (1972). Ducks nesting in association with gulls - An ecological trap? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 50, 559-563.
9. Egnell, G., Liedholm, H. & Lönnell, N. (2001). Skogsbränsle, hot eller möjlighet? - Vä gledning till miljövänligt skogsbränsleuttag [Forest fuel, threat or potential? - Directions for environmentally friendly extraction of forest fuel]. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen. (In Swedish.)
10. Ehnström, B. & Axelsson, R. (2002). Insektsgnag i bark och ved [Insect galleries in bark and wood]. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, SLU. (In Swedish with English summary.)
11. Ehnström, B. & Waldén, H. W. (1986). Faunavård i skogsbruket - Den lägre faunan [The protection and management of endangered and declining invertebrate species in Swedish woodlands]. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen. (In Swedish with English summary.)
12. Franc, N. & Götmark, F. (2007). Partial cutting favours saproxylic and herbivorous beetles in oak-rich conservation forests. In Conservation ecology of forest invertebrates, especially saproxylic beetles, in temperate successional oak-rich stands (Paper 5, pp. 1-18). Doctoral thesis, Department of Zoology, Göteborg University.
13. Gärdenfors, U. (2005). The 2005 Red List of Swedish species. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, SLU.
14. Gärdenfors, U. & Baranowski, R. (1992). Skalbaggar anpassade till öppna respektive slutna ädellövskogar föredrar olika trädslag [Beetles living in open deciduous forests prefer different tree species than those living in dense forests]. Entomologisk Tidskrift, 113, 1-11. (In Swedish with English abstract.)
15. Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379-391.
16. Götmark, F., Paltto, H., Nordén, B. & Götmark, E. (2005). Evaluating partial cutting in broadleaved temperate forest under strong experimental control: Short-term effects on herbaceous plants. Forest Ecology and Management, 214, 124-141.
17. Hannah, L., Carr, J. L. & Lankerani, A. (1995). Human disturbance and natural habitat: A biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4, 128-155.
18. Harz, B. & Topp, W. (1999). Deadwood in commercial forest: A source of danger for the outbreak pest species? Forstwissenschaftliges Centralblatt, 118, 302-313.
19. Jääskelä, M., Peltonen, M., Saarenmaa, H. & Heliövaara, K. (1997). Comparison of protection methods of pine stacks against Tomicus piniperda. Silva Fennica, 31, 143-152.
20. Jonsell, M. (2008). Saproxylic beetle species in logging residues: Which are they and what do they prefer? Norwegian Journal of Entomology, 55, 109-122.
21. Jonsell, M. & Hansson, J. (2007). Comparison of methods for sampling saproxylic beetles in fine wood. Entomologica Fennica, 18, 232-241.
22. Jonsell, M., Weslien, J. & Ehnström, B. (1998). Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 749-764.
23. Jonsell, M., Hansson, J. & Wedmo, L. (2007). Diversity of saproxylic beetle species in logging residues in Sweden - Comparisons between tree species and diameters. Biological Conservation, 138, 89-99.
24. Kappes, H. & Topp, W. (2004). Emergence of Coleoptera from deadwood in a managed broadleaved forest in central Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 1905-1924.
25. Lindbladh, M., Abrahamsson, M., Seedre, M. & Jonsell, M. (2007). Saproxylic beetles in artificially created high-stumps of spruce and birch within and outside hotspot areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 3213-3226.
26. Lindhe, A., Lindelöw, Å. & Åsenblad, N. (2005). Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood - Density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 3033-3053.
27. Lundberg, S. & Gustafsson, B. (1995). Catalogus Coleopterorum Sueciae [Catalogue of Swedish Coleoptera]. Stockholm: Naturhistoriska riksmuseet. (In Swedish.)
28. Martikainen, P. (2001). Conservation of threatened saproxylic beetles: Significance of retained aspen Populus tremula on clearcut areas. Ecological Bulletins, 49, 205-218.
29. Moeck, H. A. (1970). Ethanol as the primary attractant for the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canadian Entomology, 102, 985-995.
30. Nittérus, K., Gunnarsson, B. & Axelsson, E. (2004). Insects reared from logging residue on clear-cuts. Entomologica Fennica, 15, 53-61.
31. Nordén, B., Götmark, F., Tönnberg, M. & Ryberg, M. (2004a). Dead wood in semi-natural temperate broadleaved woodland: Contribution of coarse and fine dead wood, attached dead wood and stumps. Forest Ecology and Management, 194, 235-248.
32. Nordén, B., Ryberg, M., Götmark, F. & Olausson, B. (2004b). Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests. Biological Conservation, 117, 1-10.
33. Palm, T. (1959). Die Holz- und Rindenkäfer der süd- und mittelschwedischen Laubbäume [The wood and bark Coleoptera of deciduous trees in southern and central Sweden]. Opuscula Entomologica Supplementum, 16, 1-374. (In German with English summary.)
34. Ranius, T. & Jansson, N. (2000). The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biological Conservation, 95, 85-94.
35. Robertson, B. A. & Hutto, R. L. (2006). A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology, 87, 1075-1085.
36. Schiegg, K. (2001). Saproxylic insect diversity of beech: Limbs are richer than trunks. Forest Ecology and Management, 149, 295-304.
37. Schlaepfer, M. A., Runge, M. C. & Sherman, P. W. (2002). Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 474-480.
38. Schroeder, L. M. (1988). Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark- and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 46, 203-210.
39. Speight, M. C. D. (1989). Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
40. Svenning, J.-C. (2002). A review of natural vegetation openness in north-western Europe. Biological Conservation, 104, 133-148.
41. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. (2002). The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biological Conservation, 106, 347-357.
42. Vera, F. W. M. (2000). Grazing ecology and forest history. Oxford: CABI Publishing.
43. Weslien, J. & Lindelöw, Å. (1989). Trapping a local population of spruce bark beetles Ips typographus (L.): Population size and origin of trapped beetles. Holarctic Ecology, 12, 511-514.