Strengthening conditional presuppositions

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 289-304

  Van Rooij, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49949100979     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: 14774593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffm007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beaver, D. (1995), Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics Ph.D. thesis, CCS, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
2. Gärdenfors, P. (1988), Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
3. Gazdar, G. (1979), Pragmatics, Implicature, Presuppositions, and Logical Form. Academic Press. New York.
4. Geurts, B. (1996), 'Local satisfaction guaranteed: A presupposition theory and its problems'. Linguistics and Philosophy 19 259-94.
5. Hausser, R. (1976), 'Presuppositions in Montague grammar'. Theoretical Linguistics, 3:245-80.
6. Heim, I. (1982), The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrasesi]. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
7. Heim, I. (1983), 'On the projection problem for presuppositions'. In M. Barlow et al. (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. 114-23.
8. Heim, I. (1992), 'Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs'. Journal of Semantics 9:183-221.
9. Humberstone, L. (2000), 'Parts and partitions'. Theoria 66 41-82.
10. Karttunen, L. (1971), 'Some observations on factivity'. Papers in Linguistics 4:55-69.
11. Karttunen, L. (1974), 'Presupposition and linguistic context'. Theoretical Linguists 1:181-94.
12. Karttunen, L. & S. Peters (1979), 'Conventional implicature'. In C.-K. Oh and D. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Presupposition. Volume 11. Academic Press. New York. 1-56.
13. Kripke, S. Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem. Unpublished MS, Princeton University.
14. Lewis, D. (1988), 'Relevant implication'. Theoria 54 :161-74.
15. Merin, A. (2003), 'Presupposition and practical reason. A study in decision-theoretic semantics'. Forschungsberichte der DFG-Forschergruppe 'Logik in der Philosophie' 114, University of Konstanz.
16. Schlenker, P. (2005), 'Transparancy: An incremental account of presupposition projection'. In P. Dekker & M. Franke (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam.
17. Soames, S. (1982), 'How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem'. Linguistic Inquiry 13:483-545.
18. Stalnaker, R. (1974), 'Pragmatic presupposition'. In Munitz and Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press. New York. 197-213.
19. Stalnaker, R. (1988), 'Belief attribution and context'. In R. Grimm and D. Merrill (eds.), Content of Thought. University of Arizona Press. Tuscon, AZ. 156-81.
20. Stalnaker, R. (2002), 'Common ground'. Linguistics and Philosophy 25:701-21.
21. van der Sandt, R. (1988), Context and Presupposition. Croom Helm. London.
22. van der Sandt, R. (1992), 'Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution'. Journal of Semantics 9:223-67.
23. van Rooij, R. (2005), 'A modal analysis of presuppositions and modal subordination'. Journal of Semantics 22:281-306.
24. Veltman, F. (1996), 'Defaults in update semantics'. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25:221-61.