Innovation in international business research: A call for multiple paradigms

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1081-1090

  Sullivan, Daniel P ^a   Daniels, John D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Chaos theory; Innovation; NGOs; Nonlinear; Paradigms; Theoretical pluralism

Indexed keywords

EID: 49949096370     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400400     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adner, R., & Zemsky, P. 2003. Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. Discussion Paper No. 3994, INSEAD - Strategy, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
2. Arpan, J. 1997. Message from the AIB President: Palabras del Presidente. AIB Newsletter, 3: 2.
3. Boddewyn, J. 1997. The conceptual domain of international business: Territory, boundaries, and levels. In B. Toyne & D. Nigh (Eds), International business: An emerging vision: 50-61. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
4. Buckley, P. 2002. Is the international business research agenda running out of steam? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 365-374.
5. Buckley, P., & Casson, M. 2001. Strategic complexity in international business. In A. Rugman & T. Brewer (Eds), The Oxford handbook of international business: 84-126. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Cannella, A., & Paetzold, R. 1994. Pfeffer's barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 331-342.
7. Cilliers, P. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
8. Daneke, G. 1999. Systemic choices: Nonlinear dynamics and practical management. Ann Arbor, Ml: University of Michigan Press.
9. Daniels, J. 1991. Relevance in international business research: A need for more linkages. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 177-186.
10. Doh, J., & Teegen, H. (Eds) 2003. Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society. Westport: Praeger.
11. Dunning, J. 1989. The study of international business: A plea for a more interdisciplinary approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(5): 411-436.
12. Eden, L. 2004. Review of "Globalization and NGOs: Transforming business, government, and society". Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 564-567.
13. Eden, L., & Lenway, S. 2001. Multinationals: The Janus face of globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 383-400.
14. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1): 75-91.
15. Harvey, D., & Reed, M. 1997. Social science as the study of complex systems. In D. Kiel & E. Elliott (Eds), Chaos theory in the social sciences: Foundations and applications: 295-323. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
16. Inkpen, A. 2001. A note on ranking the international business Journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 193-196.
17. Jones, G., St Khanna, T. 2006. Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4): 453-468.
18. Kogut, B. 2005. Of beauty finding the relevant beast: The field of international business and the dialogue of fact and theory. In P. Buckley (Ed.), What is international business?: 101-123. New York: Palgrave.
19. Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Levy, D. 1994. Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Special Issue): 167-178.
21. Levy, D. 1995. International sourcing and supply chain stability. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(2): 343-360.
22. Lewin, A. Y. 2004. Letter from the editor. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 79-80.
23. Mandelbrot, B., & Hudson, R. 2004. The misbehavior of markets: A fractal view of risk, ruin, and reward. New York: Basic Books.
24. McKelvey, B. 2004. Complexity science as order creation science: New theory, new method. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 6(4): 2-28.
25. Mendenhall, M. 1999. On the need for paradigmatic integration in international human resource management. Management International Review, 39(3): 65-87.
26. Mendenhall, M., & Macomber, J. 1997. Rethinking the strategic management of expatriates from a nonlinear dynamics perspective. In Z. Aycan (Ed.), Emerging perspectives in expatriate productivity. 41-62. New York: JAI Press.
27. Peng, M. 2004. Identifying the big question in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 99-108.
28. Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 599-620.
29. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Bachrach, D., & Podsakoff, N. 2005. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5): 473-488.
30. Redding, S. 1994. Comparative management theory: Jungle, zoo or fossil bed? Organization Studies, 15(3): 323-350.
31. Safarian, A. 2003. Internalization and the MNE: A note on the spread of ideas. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 117-126.
32. Schrage, B., & Ozean, B. 2006. Catastrophe risk, sovereign borrowing and host-county government constraints in emerging markets. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of International Business, 24 June, Beijing, China.
33. Shenkar, O. 2004. One more time: International business in a global economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 161-171.
34. Shweder, R. A. 1986. Divergent rationalities. In D. Fiske & R. Shweder (Eds), Metatheory in social science: 163-196. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Stopford, J. M. 1998. Review of International business: an emerging vision. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 635-637.
36. Sullivan, D. 1998. Cognitive tendencies in international business research: Implications of a "narrow vision". Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4): 837-862.
37. Sullivan, D., & Daniels, J. 2005. Defining international business through its research. In P. Buckley (Ed.), What is International business?: 68-84. New York: Palgrave.
38. Sullivan, D., & Daniels, J. 2007. International business studies: Episodic or evolutionary? In J. Dunning & T.-M. Lin (Eds), Multinational enterprises and emerging challenges of the 21st century. 109-133. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
39. Teegen, H., Doh, J., & Vachani, S. 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 463-484.
40. Toyne, B. 1997. International business inquiry: Does it warrant a separate domain? In B. Toyne & D. Nigh (Eds), International business: An emerging vision: 67-89. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
41. van der Walt, M. 2006. A framework for knowledge innovation. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(1): 21-30.
42. Wright, R., & Ricks, D. 1994. Trends in international business research: Twenty-five years later. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(4): 72-85.