EUS accurately predicts the need for therapeutic ERCP in patients with a low probability of biliary obstruction

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 470-476

  Janssen, Jan ^a   Halboos, Ali ^a   Greiner, Lucas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTOR; SPHINCTEROTOMY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLESTASIS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 49949095973     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.051     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. McCune W.S., Shorb P.E., and Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 167 (1968) 752-756
2. Classen M., and Demling L. Endoskopische Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Steinextraktion aus dem Ductus choledochus. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 99 (1974) 496-497
3. Loperfido S., Angelini G., and Benedetti G. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 31 (1999) 125-130
4. Akashi R., Kiyozumi T., Tanaka T., et al. Mechanism of pancreatitis caused by ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 50-54
5. Freeman M.L. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56 Suppl (2002) S273-S282
6. Palazzo L., Girollet P.P., Salmeron M., et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 42 (1995) 225-231
7. Prat F., Amouyal G., Amouyal P., et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 347 (1996) 75-79
8. Burtin P., Palazzo L., Canard J.M., et al. Diagnostic strategies for extrahepatic cholestasis of indefinite origin: endoscopic ultrasonography or retrograde cholangiography? Results of a prospective study. Endoscopy 29 (1997) 349-355
9. Lachter J., Rubin A., Shiller M., et al. Linear EUS for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 51-54
10. Chak A., Hawes R.H., Cooper G.S., et al. Prospective assessment of the utility of EUS in the evaluation of gallstone pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999) 599-604
11. de Lédinghen V., Lecesne R., Raymond J.M., et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999) 26-41
12. Rösch T., Meining A., Frühmorgen S., et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 870-876
13. Kohut M., Nowakowska-Dulawa E., Marek T., et al. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 34 (2002) 299-303
14. Ainsworth A.P., Rafaelsen S.R., Wamberg P.A., et al. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 1029-1032
15. Griffin N., Wastle M.L., Dunn W.K., et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15 (2003) 809-813
16. Verma D., Kapadia A., Eisen G.M., et al. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 248-254
17. Scheiman J.M., Carlos R.C., Barnett J.L., et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatograpgy replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 2900-2904
18. Materne R., Van Beers B.E., Gigot J.F., et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 32 (2000) 3-9
19. Farrell R.J., Noonan N., Mahmud N., et al. Potential impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography workload and complication rate in patients referred because of abdominal pain. Endoscopy 33 (2001) 668-675
20. Polkowski M., Regula J., Tilszer A., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies. Endoscopy 39 (2007) 296-303
21. Sahai A.V., Devonshire D., Yeoh K.G., et al. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 2074-2080
22. Barkun A.N., Barkun J.S., Fried G.M., et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 220 (1994) 32-39
23. Janssen J. Longitudinal EUS anatomy. In: Dietrich C.F. (Ed). Endoscopic ultrasound (2006), Thieme, Stuttgart 8-16
24. Napoléon B., Dumortier J., Keriven-Souquet O., et al. Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasonography obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients. Endoscopy 35 (2003) 411-415