Land-use planning in the Chaco plain (Burruyacú, Argentina): Part 2: Generating a consensus plan to mitigate land-use conflicts and minimize land degradation

Environmental Management

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 200-209

  Recatalá Boix, Luis ^a   Zinck, Joseph Alfred ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Burruyac district; Chaco plain; Land use planning; LUPIS; Multiple stakeholders; Spatial decision support system

Indexed keywords

ARGENTINA; CHACO PLAIN; COMMERCIAL FARMERS; FOREST CONSERVATION; LAND DEGRADATION; LAND-USE PLANNING; LOCAL INSTITUTIONS; LUPIS; MARKET PRICING; MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; RESOURCE BASE; RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS; SOIL COMPACTIONS; SOIL DEGRADATION; SPATIAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; SPATIAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; AGRICULTURE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CONSERVATION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORESTRY; LANDFORMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL MECHANICS; SOILS; SULFATE MINERALS;

LAND USE;

COMPACTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FORESTRY; LAND DEGRADATION; LAND USE CONFLICT; LAND USE PLANNING; LIVESTOCK; MITIGATION; RURAL AREA; SOIL DEGRADATION; SOIL EROSION; SOYBEAN; STAKEHOLDER;

ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; SOIL COMPACTION; SOIL DEGRADATION; SOIL EROSION;

AGRICULTURE; ARGENTINA; CONSENSUS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOCIAL PLANNING; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

AGRICULTURE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CONSERVATION; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; DEGRADATION; FORESTRY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; PLANNING; SOIL; SOIL MECHANICS; SULFATES;

ARGENTINA; BURRUYACU; SOUTH AMERICA; TUCUMAN;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 49849088196     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9114-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. W Braithwaite L Belbin JR Ive MA Austin 1993 Land use allocation and biological conservation in the Batemans Bay forests of New South Wales. Australian Forestry 56 4 21
2. Bucher EH (1983) Chaco and Caatinga: South American arid savannas, woodlands and thickets. In: Huntley B, Walker B (eds) Ecology of tropical Savannas. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
3. EH Bucher PC Huszar 1999 Sustainable management of the Gran Chaco of South America: ecological promise and economic constraints Journal of Environmental Management 57 99 108
4. JD Cain K Jinapala IW Makin PG Somaratna BR Ariyaratna LR Perera 2003 Participatory decision support for agricultural management. A case study from Sri Lanka Agricultural Systems 76 457 482
5. D Cocks 1984 A systematic method of public use zoning of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia Coastal Zone Management Journal 12 359 383
6. Cocks D (1992) Use with care. Managing Australia's natural resources in the twenty-first century. New South Wales University Press, New South Wales, Australia
7. D Cocks J Ive 1996 Mediation support for forest land allocation: the SIRO-MED system Environmental Management 20 41 52
8. KD Cocks JR Ive JR Davis 1986 Policy guidelines for the management of public natural lands Land Use Policy 3 9 20
9. Cocks D, Ive J, Clark J (eds) (1995) Forest issues: processes and tools for inventory, evaluation, mediation and allocation. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Divisional Project Report 7. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
10. Flores E (1997) Monitoring land use changes and comparing soil physical properties between arable and forest land in the western Chaco plain, NW Argentina. MSc Thesis, International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands
11. Gómez LA, Ferrao RF, Casen ML (1992) Carta básica de suelos del Departamento de Burruyacú, Provincia de Tucumán. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Centro de Investigaciones de Recursos Naturales, Instituto de Suelos, Castelar, Argentina
12. ITC (1997) Integrated Land and Water Information System (ILWIS). International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands
13. Ive JR (1992) LUPIS: computer assistance for land-use allocation. Resource Technology 92 Taipei: Information technology for environmental management, Taiwan
14. Ive JR (1997) LUPIS. A spatial decision support system. A review of wildlife and ecology's software tools for regional land resource analysis and planning. CSIRO, Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Divisional Report. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia
15. JR Ive KD Cocks 1983 SIRO-PLAN and LUPLAN: an Australian approach to land use planning. 2: the LUPLAN land use planning package Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 10 347 355
16. Ive JR, Cocks KD (1988) LUPIS: a decision-support system for land planners and managers. In: Newton PW, Taylor MAP, Sharpe R (eds) Desktop planning: microcomputer applications for infrastructure and services planning and management. Hargreen, Melbourne, Australia
17. JR Ive KD Cocks CA Parvey 1989 Using the LUPIS land management package to select and schedule multi-site operations Journal of Environmental Management 29 31 45
18. MA Janssen H Goosen N Omtzigt 2006 A simple mediation and negotiation support tool for water management in the Netherlands Landscape and Urban Planning 78 71 84
19. JL Kok HG Wind 2003 Design and application of decision-support systems for integrated water management: lessons to be learnt Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 28 571 578
20. PA Kwaku Kyem 2004 Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: the search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 3 57
21. J Minetti E Sierra 1984 Expansión de la frontera agrícola en Tucumán y el diagnóstico climático Revista Industrial y Agrícola de Tucumán 62 69 77
22. Recatalá L (1995) Propuesta metodológica para planificación de los usos del territorio y evaluación de impacto ambiental en el ámbito mediterráneo valenciano. Tesis Doctoral, Universitat de València, Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat de València, Valencia, España
23. Recatalá L, Zinck JA (2006) Land suitability and land use planning. In: Zinck JA (ed) Land use change and land degradation in the western Chaco. ITC Publication 84. Enschede, The Netherlands, pp 233-266
24. L Recatalá JR Ive IA Baird N Hamilton J Sánchez 2000 Land-use planning in the Valencian Mediterranean region: using LUPIS to generate issue relevant plans Journal of Environmental Management 59 169 184
25. Rodríguez O (1995) Land use conflicts and planning strategies in urban fringes: a case study of Western Caracas (Venezuela). ITC Dissertation 27. International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands
26. DH Walker 2002 Decision support, learning and rural resource management Agricultural Systems 73 113 127
27. GA Yapp EB Wiken RR Gelines NR Morrison 1986 A microcomputer based method for enhanced use of large land data systems in Canada Landscape and Urban Planning 13 169 181
28. Zinck JA (1996) La información edáfica en la planificación del uso de las tierras y el ordenamiento territorial. In: Ruíz JA, Raya AM, Roca AR (eds) Evaluación y manejo de suelos. Consejería de Agricultura, Junta de Andalucía, Sociedad Española de Ciencia del Suelo y Universidad de Granada, Granada, España
29. Zinck JA, Flores E, Sayago JM (2006) Compaction and fertility depletion. In: Zinck JA (ed) Land use change and land degradation in the western Chaco. ITC Publication 84. Enschede, The Netherlands, pp 169-231