Two different studies on carotid stent cell design importance, or are we just saying the same thing?

Stroke

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Setacci, Carlo ^a   De Donato, Gianmarco ^a   Bosiers, Marc ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b Department of Vascular Surgery ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY EMBOLISM; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; BELGIUM; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID STENT CELL DESIGN; DISEASE REGISTRY; HUMAN; ITALY; LETTER; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RISK FACTOR; STENT; STROKE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; NOTE;

CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STENTS; STROKE;

EID: 49849087131     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.519389     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Setacci C. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:135-141.
2. Schillinger M, Gschwendtner M, Reimers B, Trenkler J, Stockx L, Mair J, Macdonald S, Karnel F, Huber K, Minar E. Does carotid stent cell design matter? Stroke. 2008;39:905-909.