Establishing an objective system for the assessment of public acceptance of nuclear power in China

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Volumn 238, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2834-2838

  Liu, Changxin ^a   Zhang, Zuoyi ^a   Kidd, Steve ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b World Nuclear Association   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT MODELS; ASSESSMENT SYSTEM; DECISION MAKERS; MAIN FACTORS; NUCLEAR POWER; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS; REFERENCE DATA; STATISTICAL THEORY;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

EID: 49849086780     PISSN: 00295493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Blee D. Lessons learned? Selected public acceptance case studies since Three Mile Island. Nuclear Energy 1 40 (2001)
2. Grimston M., and Beck P. Double or Quit? The Global Future of Civil Nuclear Energy (2002), Royal Institute of International Affairs, London
3. Lee K.J., and Lee Y.E. Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy in Korea. Proceedings of the Fourth Nuclear Energy Symposium Energy Future in Asia/Pacific Region. Taiwan, China (1999)
4. Lv S. Social Statistics (1998), Beijing University Press, Beijing
5. Rosa E., and Dunlap R. Poll trends: nuclear power-three decades of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 58 (1994) 295-324
6. L. Sjoberg, 2003. Risk communication between experts and the public: perceptions and intentions. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration.
7. Shi Z., Zhang Z., and Xue L. Study on risk acceptance of nuclear power. Nuclear Science and Engineering 22 3 (2002)
8. Slovic P., and Fischoff B. Facts and Fears-Understanding Perceived Risk. Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough (1980), Plenum Press, New York p. 181-214
9. Wang Q. Guidance of Statistic Performance (1994), Northeast Financial University Press, Liaoning