Visual-haptic perception of compliance: Fusion of visual and haptic information

Symposium on Haptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2008 - Proceedings, Haptics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 79-86

  Kuschel, Martin ^a   Buss, Martin ^a   Freyberger, Franziska ^b   Färber, Berthold ^b   Klatzky, Roberta L ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b BUNDESWEHR UNIVERSITY MUNICH   (Germany)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance; Human system interface; Maximum likelihood estimation; Perception; Sensory fusion

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; REMOTE CONTROL; STANDARDS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMPLIANCE; FORCE INFORMATION; HAPTIC INFORMATION; HAPTICS; HUMAN SYSTEM INTERFACE; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTIONS; SENSORY FUSION; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT; VISUAL POSITIONING; VISUAL-HAPTIC;

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

EID: 49749152118     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HAPTICS.2008.4479917     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. W. J. Adams, E. W. Graf, and M. O. Ernst. Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10): 1057-1058, 2004.
2. M. Überle and M. Buss. Control of kinesthetic haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004.
3. E. Brenner and J. B. J. Smeets. Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse. Spatial Vision, 16:364-376, 2003.
4. J.-P. Bresciani, F. Dammeier, and M. O. Ernst. Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. Journal of Vision, 6:554-564, 2006.
5. R. G. Brown and P. Y. C. Hwang. Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kaiman Filtering. John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
6. G. A. Calvert, M. J. Brammer, and S. D. Iversen. Crossmodal identification. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7):247-253, 1998.
7. G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, and B. E. Stein. The handbook ofmultisensoty processes. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.
8. N. Dhruv and F. Tendick. Frequency dependence of compliance con-trast detection. In Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, 2000.
9. K. Drewing and M. O. Ernst. Integration of force and position cues for shape perception through active touch. Brain Research, 1078:92-100, 2006.
10. J. Driver and C. Spence. Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence. Current Biology, 10(13):731.-735, 2000.
11. M. O. Ernst and M. S. Banks. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal, fashion. Nature, 415:429-433, 2002.
12. M. O. Ernst and H. H. Bülthoff. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4):162-169, 2004.
13. F. Freyberger, M. Kuschel, R. L. Klatzky, B. Färber, and M. Buss. Visual-haptic perception of compliance: Direct matching of visual and haptic information. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications (HAVE), 2007.
14. G. A. Gescheider. Psychophysics - Method and Theory. Hillsdale: J. Wiley & Sons, 1976.
15. S. Guest and C. Spence. What role does multisensory integration play in the visuotactile pereption of texture? International Journal of Psychophyslology, 50:63-80, 2003.
16. J. M. Hillis, M. O. Ernst, M. S. Banks, and M. S. Landy. Combining sensory information: Mandatory fusion within, but not netween, senses. Science, 298:1627-1630, 2002.
17. J. M. Hillis, S. J. Watt, M. S. Landy, and M. S. Banks. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(13):1-24, 2004.
18. D. C. Knill and J. A. Saunders. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgements of surface slant? Vision Research, 43:2539-2558, 2003.
19. D. W. Massaro. Speechreading: illusion or window into pattern recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(8):310-317, 1999.
20. M. K. O'Malley and M. Goldfarb, The implications of surface stiffness for size identification and perceived surface hardness in haptic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington DC, pages 1255-1260, 2002.
21. F. Pavani, C. Spence, and J. Driver. Visual capture of touch: Outof-the-body experience with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11(5):353-359, 2000.
22. R. Scheuchenpflug. Measuring presence in virtual environments. In M. J. Smith, G. Salvendey, and M. R. Kasdorf, editors, HCI International 2001, New Orleans, pages 56-58, 2001.
23. L. Sciavicco and B. Siciliano. Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators. Springer, 1 edition, 2003.
24. S. Shimojo and L. Shams. Sensory modalities are not separate modaltities: Plasticity and interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11:505-509, 2001.
25. B. E. Stein and M. A. Meredith. The merging of the senses. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.
26. H. Z. Tan, N. I. Durlach, G. L. Beauregard, and M. A. Srinivasan. Manual discrimination of compliance using active pinch grasp: The roles of force and work cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(4):495-510, 1995.
27. S. A. Wall and S. A. Brewster. Scratching the surface: Preliminary investigations of haptic properties for data representation. In Proceedings of Eurohaptics 2003, Dublin, Ireland, pages 330-342, 2003.
28. R. B. Welch and D. H. Warren. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Sensory Processes and Perception, Volume 1, chapter Intersensory Interactions. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1986.
29. F. A. Wichmann and N. J. Hill. The psychometric function: I. fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception and Psychophysics, 63:1293-1313, 2001.
30. B. G. Witmer and M. J. Singer. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments., 7(3):225-240, 1998.
31. S. Yamakawa, H. Fujimoto, S. Manabe, and Y. Kobyayshi. The necessary conditions of the scaling ratio in master-slave systems based on human difference limen of force sense. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(2):275-282, 2005.