The roots of linguistics organization in a new language

Interaction Studies

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 133-153

  Aronoff, Mark ^a   Meir, Irit ^b   Padden, Carol A ^c   Sandler, Wendy ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49749149551     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.9.1.10aro     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Al-Fityani, K. (2007). Arab Sign Languages: A lexical comparison. Center for Research in Language Technical Reports, 19(1), 3-13.
2. Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandier, W. (2004). Morphological universals and the sign language type. In G. Booj & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004 (pp. 19-39). Dordrecht/Boston: KJuwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bakker, P. (2003). Pidgin inflectional morphology and its implications for creole morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 2002 (pp. 3-34). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Dachkovsky, S. (2006) ABSL Vocabulary Report. Working paper, Sign Language Research Lab, University of Haifa.
7. Dachkovsky, S., & Sandler, W., (2007). Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Ms. University of Haifa.
8. Ekman, R, & Friesen, W (1978). Facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
9. Gershkoff- Stowe, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Is there a natural order for expressing semantic relations? Cognitive Psychology, 45 (3), 375-412.
10. Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88-96.
12. Israel, A. (in preparation). Phonetic variation in the signs of ABSL and ISL. MA thesis, The University of Haifa.
13. Jackendoff, R. (1999). Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 272-279.
14. Lieberman, P. 2006. Toward an Evolutionary Biology of Language. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15. Martinet, A. (1960). Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Colin.
16. Meir, I. (2002). A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(2), 413-450.
17. Meir, I. Padden, C., Aronoff, M, & Sandler, W. (2007) Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, 43(3), 531-563.
18. Meir, I., & Sandler, W. (2008). Language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
19. Nespor, M., & Sandler, W. (1999). Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech, 42(2&3), 143-176.
20. Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
21. Nowak, M., & Krakauer, D. (1999). The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 8028-8033.
22. Padden, C. (1988). Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Press.
23. Padden, C. (1990). The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues (pp. 118-132). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
24. Padden, C., Meir, I., Sandler, W., & Aronoff, M. (in press). Against all expectations: The encoding of subject and object in a new language. In D. Gerdts, J. Moore & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Hypothesis A /Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201-236.
27. Plag, I. (2006). Morphology in pidgins and creoles. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 305-308). Oxford: Elsevier.
28. Reilly, J., McIntire, M., & Bellugi, U. (1990). Baby face: A new perspective on universals in language acquisition. In P. Siple & S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Volume 2 (pp. 9-24). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Sandler, W. (1989) Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris.
30. Sandler, W. (1999) The Medium and the Message: Prosodic Interpretation of Linguistic Content in Sign Language. Sign Language and Linguistics 2:2. 187-216.
31. Sandler, W. (2005) Prosodic constituency and intonation in a sign language. Gebardensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung, 13, 59-86.
32. Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(7), 2661-2665.
34. Scott, D., Carmi, R., Eldebour, K., Duyk, G., Stone, E., & Sheffield, V. (1995). Nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness is linked to the DFNB1 locus in a large inbred Bedouin family from Israel. American Journal of Human Genetics, 57, 965-968.
35. Senghas, A., Coppola, M., Newport, E., & Supalla, T. (1997). Argument structure in Nicaraguan Sign Language: The emergence of grammatical devices. In E. Hughes & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, 21 (pp. 550-561). Boston: Cascadilla Press.
36. Stokoe, W (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8.
37. Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum.
38. van der Kooij, Els. 2002. Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: The Role of Phonetic Implementation and Iconicity. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
39. Wilbur, R. (1990). Why syllables? What the notion means for ASL research. In P. Siple & S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Volume 2 (pp. 81-108). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.