Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  AbuRahma, Ali F ^a   Abu Halimah, Shadi ^a   Bensenhaver, Jessica ^a   Dean, L Scott ^b   Keiffer, Tammi ^b   Emmett, Mary ^b   Flaherty, Sarah ^b  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENT; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VELOCITY;

EID: 49749140721     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ferguson R.D., and Ferguson J.G. Carotid angioplasty. In search of a worthy alternative to endarterectomy. Arch Neurol 53 (1996) 696-698
2. New G., Roubin G.S., Iyer S.S., Vitek J.J., Wholey M.H., Diethrich E.B., et al. Safety, efficacy and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: a multicenter study. J Endovasc Ther 7 (2000) 345-352
3. Yadav J., and SAPPHIRE Investigators. Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy: the SAPPHIRE study. Circulation 106 (2002) 2986-2989
4. Hobson R.W., Lal B.K., Chakhtoura E., Goldstein J., Haser P.B., Kubicka R., et al. Carotid artery stenting: analysis of data for 105 patients at high risk. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003) 1234-1239
5. Lal B.K., Hobson II R.W., Goldstein J., Geohagan M., Chakhtoura E., Pappas P.J., et al. In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Life table analysis and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg (2003) 381162-381168 discussion 9
6. AbuRahma A.F., Maxwell D., Eads K., Flaherty S.K., and Stutler T. Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis. Vascular 15 (2007) 119-125
7. Robbin M.L., Lockhart M.E., Weber T.M., Vitek J.J., Smith J.K., Yadav J., et al. Carotid artery stents: Early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. Radiology 205 (1997) 749-756
8. Ringer A.J., German J.W., Guterman L.R., and Hopkins L.N. Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound. Neurosurgery 51 (2002) 639-643
9. Lal B.K., Hobson R.W., Goldstein J., Chakhtoura E.Y., and Duran W.N. Carotid artery stenting: Is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 58-66
10. AbuRahma A.F., Bates M.C., Stone P.A., and Wulu J.T. Comparative study of operative treatment and PTA/stenting for recurrent carotid disease. J Vasc Surg 34 (2001) 831-838
11. AbuRahma A.F., Robinson P.A., Stickler D.L., Pollack J.A., Richmond B.K., Alberts S., et al. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Ann Vasc Surg 12 (1998) 349-358
12. Jahromi A.S., Cina C.S., Liu Y., and Clase C.M. Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 41 (2005) 962-972
13. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325 (1991) 445-453
14. Hobson II R.W. CREST (carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial): Background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg 13 (2000) 139-143
15. Yadav J.S., Wholey M.H., Kuntz R.E., Fayad P., Katzen B.T., Mishkel G.J., et al. Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 1493-51
16. Gray W.A., Hopkins L.N., Yadav S., Davis T., Wholey M., Atkinson R., et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006) 258-268
17. Kwon B.J., Jung C., Sheen S.H., Cho J.H., and Han M.H. CT angiography of stented carotid arteries: Comparison with Doppler ultrasonography. J Endovasc Ther 14 (2007) 489-497
18. Stanziale S.F., Wholey M.H., Boules T.N., Selzer F., and Makaroun M.S. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria. J Endovasc Ther 12 (2005) 346-353
19. Lal B.K., Hobson II R.W., Tofighi B., Kapadia I., Cuadra S., and Jamil Z. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 47 (2008) 63-73
20. Peterson B.G., Longo G.M., Kibbe M.R., Matsumura J.S., Blackburn D., Astleford P., et al. Duplex ultrasound remains a reliable test even after carotid stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 19 (2005) 793-797
21. Cinat M., Lane C.T., Pham H., Lee A., Wilson S.E., and Gordon I. Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 28 (1998) 290-300
22. Cinat M., Casalme C., Wilson S.E., Pham H., and Anderson P. Computed tomography angiography validates duplex sonographic evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Am Surg 69 (2003) 842-847