Entrance Surface Dose during Three-dimensional Imaging with a Flat-panel Detector Angiography System

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1361-1365

  Suzuki, Shigeru ^a   Furui, Shigeru ^a   Yamaguchi, Ichiro ^d   Yamagishi, Masafumi ^b   Abe, Toshi ^e   Kobayashi, Ikuo ^c   Haruyama, Takahiro ^a  

^a TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TEIKYO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c LANDAUER INC   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

^e KURUME UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; DOSIMETRY; FLAT PANEL DETECTOR ANGIOGRAPHY SYSTEM; IMAGING SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RADIATION SCATTERING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BODY BURDEN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOMETRY; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 49749137378     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Akpek S., Brunner T., Benndorf G., and Strother C. Three-dimensional imaging and cone beam volume CT in C-arm angiography with flat panel detector. Diagn Interv Radiol 11 (2005) 10-13
2. Ishikura R., Ando K., Nagami Y., et al. Evaluation of vascular supply with cone-beam computed tomography during intraarterial chemotherapy for a skull base tumor. Radiat Med 24 (2006) 384-387
3. Hirota S., Nakao N., Yamamoto S., et al. Cone-beam CT with flat-panel-detector digital angiography system: early experience in abdominal interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29 (2006) 1034-1038
4. Siewerdsen J.H., Moseley D.J., Burch S., et al. Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys 32 (2005) 241-254
5. Wagner L.K., Eifel P.J., and Geise R.A. Potential biological effects following high x-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 5 (1994) 71-84
6. Karppinen J., Parviainen T., Servomaa A., and Komppa T. Radiation risk and exposure of radiologists and patients during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 57 (1995) 481-485
7. Lichtenstein D.A., Klapholz L., Vardy D.A., et al. Chronic radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterization. Arch Dermatol 132 (1996) 663-667
8. Sovik E., Klow N.E., Hellesnes J., and Lykke J. Radiation induced skin injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: case report. Acta Radiol 37 (1996) 305-306
9. D'Incan M., and Roger H. Radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterization. Arch Dermatol 133 (1997) 242-243
10. Nahass G.T. Acute radiodermatitis after radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Am Acad Dermatol 36 (1997) 881-884
11. Parry R.A., Glaze S.A., and Archer B.R. The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics 19 (1999) 1289-1302
12. Wagner L.K., Lester R.G., and Saldana L.R. Exposure of the pregnant patient to diagnostic radiations: a guide to medical management. 2nd ed. (1997), Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin
13. Johns H.E., and Cunningham J.R. The physics of radiology. 4th ed. (1983), Thomas, Springfield, Illinois
14. International Electrotechnical Commission. International standard IEC 60601-2-43. Medical electrical equipment-part 2-43: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for interventional procedures (2000), International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland
15. Suzuki S., Furui S., Kobayashi I., et al. Radiation dose to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization: comparison of a digital flat-panel system and conventional unit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 (2005) 855-859
16. Food and Drug Administration. Recording information in the patient's medical record that identifies the potential for serious x-ray-induced skin injuries following fluoroscopic guided procedures (1995), FDA, Rockville, Maryland
17. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30 (2000) 25-43 ICRP Publication 85