Enabling smooth and scalable dynamic 3D visualization of discrete-event construction simulations in outdoor Augmented Reality

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 2168-2176

  Behzadan, Amir H ^a   Kamat, Vineet R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGON; MILITARY ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION;

3-D VISUALIZATION; AUGMENTED REALITY; CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES; DATA TRANSMISSIONS; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; DISCRETE-EVENT CONSTRUCTION SIMULATIONS; DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION; EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; HARDWARE COMPONENTS; JOB SITES; OUTDOOR AUGMENTED REALITY; SCENE GRAPHS; SIMULATED MODEL; SIMULATED OPERATIONS; USER INVOLVEMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 49749119140     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2007.4419851     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Behzadan, A. H., and V. R. Kamat. 2007a. General Purpose Modular Hardware and Software Framework for Mobile Outdoor Augmented Reality Applications in Engineering, Advanced Engineering Informatics, New York, NY: Elsevier Science. (In Review)
2. Behzadan, A. H., and V. R. Kamat. 2007b. Georeferenced Registration of Construction Graphics in Mobile out-door Augmented Reality, ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Reston, VA. (In Press)
3. th International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE-XI), Montreal, QB, Canada.
4. Bennett, P. (2006). National Marine Electronics Association - FAQ. Edge of Space Science. Available via [accessed December 5, 2006].
5. Dunston P., X. Wang, M. Billinghusrt, and B. Hampson. 2002. Mixed Reality benefits for design perception. In Proceedings of 19th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics Construction (ISARC 2002), 191-196, Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
6. Hammad A., J. H. Garrett, and H. Karimi. 2004. Location-based computing for infrastructure field tasks. Telegeoinformatics: Location-based computing and services, 287-314. CRC Press.
7. Kamat, V. R. 2003. VITASCOPE: Extensible and Scalable 3D Visualization of Simulated Construction Operations. PhD dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Eng., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
8. th EG-ICE Workshop of Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture, Ascona, Switzerland.
9. Kamat, V. R., and J. C. Martinez. 2002. Scene Graph and frame update algorithms for smooth and scalable 3D visualization of simulated construction operations, Journal of Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 17(4): 228-245, Malden, VA:
10. Looser J., R. Grasset, H. Seichter, and P. Lamb (2006). OSGAT: ARToolkit for OpenSceneGraph. Available at < http://www.artoolworks.com/ community/osgart/> [accessed April 10, 2007].
11. Roberts G. W., A. Evans, A. Dodson, B. Denby, S. Cooper, and R. Hollands. 2002. The use of Augmented Reality, GPS, and INS for subsurface data visualization. International Congress, Washington, D.C.
12. Thomas B., W. Piekarski, and B. Gunther. 1998. Using Augmented Reality to visualize architectural designs in an outdoor environment. DCNet'98 Online Conference, Available via [accessed: March 10, 2003].
13. rd Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, 913-919. Reston, VA: ASCE.