Punishing persistence

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 468-481

  Roberts, Julian V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49749115165     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: 14643529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azn017     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ASHWORTH, A. (2005), Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. BAGARIC, M. (2001), Punishment and Sentencing: A Rational Approach. Sydney: Cavendish Publishing.
3. BAGARIC, M. and AMARASEKARA, K. (2001), 'Feeling Sorry - Tell Someone who Cares: The Irrelevance of Remorse in Sentencing', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 40: 364-76.
4. BAGARIC, M. and EDNEY, R. (2004), 'The Sentencing Advisory Commission and the Hope of Smarter Sentencing', Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 16: 125-39.
5. BENAQUISTO, L. and FREED, P. (1996), 'The Myth of Inmate Lawlessness: The Perceived Contradiction between Self and Other in Inmates' Support for Criminal Justice Sanctioning Norms', Law and Society Review, 30: 481-511.
6. Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987), Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
7. CARROLL, J. and PAYNE, J. (1977), Judgments about Crime and the Criminal', in B. Sales, eds., Perspectives in Law and Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press.
8. COX, E. (1877), The Principles of Punishment as Applied in the Administration of Criminal Law, by Judges and Magistrates. London: Garland Publishing.
9. CUNLIFFE, J. and SHEPHERD, A. (2007), Re-Offending of Adults: Results from the 2004 Cohort. London: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
10. FLETCHER, G. (1978), Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
11. FOX, R. (1994), 'The Meaning of Proportionality in Sentencing', Melbourne University Law Review, 19:489-511.
12. GROSS, H. (1979), A Theory of Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. HAAS, N., DE KEIJSER, J. and VANDERVEEN, G. (2007), 'Steun voor eigenrichting: Invloed van Ernst van de aanleiding en mate van planning, een experiment', Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 49: 45-56.
14. HANS, V. and DOOB, A. N. (1976), 'Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberation of Simulated Juries', Criminal Law Quarterly, 18: 235-53.
15. HARREL, W. (1981), 'The Effects of Alcohol Use and Offender Remorsefulness on Sentencing Decisions', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11: 83-91.
16. Home Office (2001), Making Punishments Work, London: Home Office.
17. _ (2007), Sentencing Statistics 2005: England and Wales. London: Home Office: Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
18. ICM Research (2002), BBC Crime Day Poll, available online at www.icmresearch.co.uk.
19. KLEINKE, C., WALLIS, R. and STALDER, K. (1992), 'Evaluation of Rapist as a Function of Expressed Intent and Remorse', Journal of Social Psychology, 132: 525-37.
20. Law Reform Commission of Ireland (1993), Consultation Paper of Sentencing. Dublin: The Law Reform Commission.
21. MACPHERSON, D. (2002), 'The Relevance of Prior Record in the Criminal Law: A Response to the Theory of Professor von Hirsch', Queen's Law Journal, 28:177-219.
22. RADZINOWICZ, L. and HOOD, R. (1990), The Emergence of Penal Policy in Victorian and Edwardian England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. RAZ, J. (1979), The Authority of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. ROBERTS, J. V. (1997), 'Paying for the Past: The Role of Criminal Record in the Sentencing Process', in M. Tonry, ed., Crime and Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. _ (2008a), Punishing Persistent Offenders: Community and Offender Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. _ (2008b), 'The Role of Public Opinion in the Development of Sentencing Policy and Practice', in K. Gelb and A. Freiberg, eds, Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
27. ROBERTS, J. V. and HOUGH, M. (2005), Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
28. ROBINSON, P. and DARLEY, J. (1995), Justice, Liability, and Blame. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29. ROSSI, P. and BERK, R. (1997), Just Punishments. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
30. SCHER, S. and DARLEY, J. (1997), 'How Effective are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act', Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 26: 127-40.
31. Sentencing Guidelines Council (2004), Overarching Principles: Seriousness, available online at www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk.
32. SINGER, R. (1979), Just Deserts: Sentencing Based on Equality and Desert. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
33. STEBLAY, N., HOSCH, N., CULHANE, S. and MCWETHY, A. (2006), 'The Impact on Juror Verdicts of Judicial Instructions to Disregard Inadmissible Evidence: A Meta-Analysis', Law and Human Behavior, 30: 469-92.
34. THOMAS, D. (1970), Principles of Sentencing, 1st edn. London: Heinemann.
35. US Sentencing Commission (2006), Guidelines Manual available online at www.ussc.gov.
36. Victoria Department of Justice (2006), Victoria Sentencing Manual, available online at www.justice.vic.gov.au/emanuals/VSM/PreviousConvictions. htm.
37. VON HIRSCH, A. (1976), Doing Justice. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
38. _ (1985), Past or Future Crimes: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39. _ (1993), Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40. VON HIRSCH, A. and ROBERTS, J. V. (2004), 'Legislating Sentencing Principles: The Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 relating to Sentencing Purposes and the Role of Previous Convictions', Criminal Law Review, August: 639-52.
41. WASIK, M. and VON HIRSCH, A. (1994), 'Section 29 Revised: Previous Convictions in Sentencing', Criminal Law Review, June: 409-18.
42. WILKINS, L. (1984), Consumerist Criminology. London: Heinemann.