A survey and evaluation of tool features for understanding reverse-engineered sequence diagrams

Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 291-315

  Bennett, C ^a   Myers, D ^a   Storey, M A ^a   German, D M ^a   Ouellet, D ^b   Salois, M ^b   Charland, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA VALCARTIER   (Canada)

Author keywords

Reverse engineering; Sequence diagrams; Software understanding; Tool survey; User study

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; RESEARCH;

HUMAN SUBJECTS; PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING; REVERSE ENGINEERING; SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS; SOFTWARE UNDERSTANDING; TOOL SUPPORTS; TOOL SURVEY; USER STUDY;

SURVEYS;

EID: 49749108988     PISSN: 1532060X     EISSN: 15320618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smr.372     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Kruchten P. The '4+1' view model of software architecture. IEEE Software 1995; 12(6):42-50.
2. Hamou-Lhadj A, Lethbridge TC. A survey of trace exploration tools and techniques. CASCON '04: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research. IBM Press: Markham, Canada, 2004; 42-55.
3. Hamou-Lhadj A, Lethbridge TC. Challenges and requirements for an effective trace exploration tool. IWPC '04: Proceedings 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society: Bari, Italy, 2004; 70-78.
4. Cornelissen B, van Deursen A, Moonen L, Zaidman A. Visualizing test suites to aid in software understanding. CSMR '07: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. IEEE Computer Society: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007; 213-222.
5. Kern J, Garrett C. Effective Sequence Diagram Generation: Effective Use of Options with Borland Together Technologies. http: www.borland.com/resources/ en/pdf/white-papers/20263.pdf June 2003 [7 July 2008].
6. Eisenbarth T, Koschke R, Simon D. Aiding program comprehension by static and dynamic feature analysis. International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM). IEEE Computer Society: Florence, Italy, 2001; 602-611.
7. Chen K, Rajlich V. Case study of feature location using dependence graph. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPQ. IEEE Computer Society: Limerick, Ireland, 2000; 241-247.
8. Walenstein A. Cognitive support in software engineering tools: A distributed cognition framework. PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University, BC, Canada, May 2002.
9. Sharp R, Rountev A. Interactive exploration of UML sequence diagrams. Third International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VlSSOFT). IEEE Computer Society: Paris, France, 2005; 8-13.
10. Charland P. Dessureault D, Lizotte M, Ouellet D, Nécaille C. Using software analysis tools to understand military applications: A qualitative study. Technical Memorandum DRDC Valcartier TM 2005-425, Defence Research & Development Canada-Valcartier, QC, Canada, June 2006; 73.
11. The Eclipse Foundation. Eclipse-An Open Development Platform, http://www.eclipse.org [7 July 2008].
12. The Eclipse Foundation. Using UML2 Trace Interaction Views. http://help.eclipse.org/help33/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse. tptp.platform.doc.user/tasks/tesqanac.htm [7 July 2008].
13. Hamou-Lhadj A, Lethbridge TC, Fu L. SEAT: A usable trace analysis tool. IWPC '05: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society: St Louis MO, U.S.A., 2005; 157-160.
14. Koskimies K, Mössenböck H. Scene: Using scenario diagrams and active text for illustrating object-oriented programs. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society: Berlin, Germany, 1996; 366-375.
15. Rumbaugh J, Blaha M, Premerlani W, Eddy F, Lorensen W. Object-oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs NJ, U.S.A., 1990; 500.
16. Systä T. Understanding the behavior of java programs. Proceedings of the 7th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE). IEEE Computer Society: Brisbane, Australia, 2000; 214-223.
17. Pauw WD, Lorenz D, Vlissides J, Wegman M. Execution patterns in object-oriented visualization. Proceedings of the Conference on Object-oriented Technologies and Systems (COOTS '98). USENIX: Santa Fe, U.S.A., 1998; 219-234.
18. Jerding DF, Stasko JT, Ball T. Visualizing interactions in program executions. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM Press: Boston MA, U.S.A., 1997; 360-370.
19. McGavin M, Wright T, Marshall S. Visualisations of execution traces (VET): An interactive plugin-based visualisation tool. Proceedings of the 7th Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC '06). Australian Computer Society: Hobart, Australia, 2006; 153-160.
20. Walker RJ, Murphy GC, Freeman-Benson B, Wright D, Swanson D, Isaak J. Visualizing dynamic software system information through high-level models. SIGPLAN Notices 1998; 33(10):271-283.
21. Pauw WD, Jensen E, Mitchell N, Sevitsky G, Vlissides JM, Yang J. Visualizing the execution of java programs. Revised Lectures on Software Visualization, International Seminar. Springer: London, U.K., 2001; 151-162.
22. Salah M, Denton T, Mancoridis S, Shokoufandeh A, Vokolos FI. Scenariographer: A tool for reverse engineering class usage scenarios from method invocation sequences. ICSM '05: Proceedings 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE Computer Society: Budapest, Hungary, 2005; 155-164.
23. Riva C, Rodriguez JV. Combining static and dynamic views for architecture reconstruction. CSAfR '02: Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. IEEE Computer Society: Budapest, Hungary, 2002; 47-55.
24. Hamou-Lhadj A, Lethbridge T. Summarizing the content of large traces to facilitate the understanding of the behaviour of a software system. ICPC '06: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension. IEEE Computer Society: Athens, Greece, 2006; 181-190.
25. Storey MA, Cheng LT, Bull I, Rigby P. Shared waypoints and social tagging to support collaboration in software development. CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press: Banff, Canada, 2006; 195-198.
26. IBM. Rational Rose Enterprise, http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/ developer/rose/enterprise [7 July 2008].
27. Omondo. EclipseUML. http://www.eclipsedownload.com [7 July 2008].
28. Borland. Together, http://www.borland.com/together [7 July 2008].
29. Bennett C, Myers D, Storey MA, German D. Working with 'monster' traces: Building a scalable, usable sequence viewer. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Program Comprehension Through Dynamic Analysis (PCODA). Technical Report TUD-SERG-2007-022. Delft University of Technology: Vancouver, Canada, 2007; 1-5.
30. Christl A, Koschke R, Storey MA. Automated clustering to support the reflexion method. Information and Software Technology 2007; 49(3):255-274.
31. Pacione MJ. A novel software visualisation model to support object-oriented program comprehension. PhD Thesis, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, November 2005.
32. Pacione MJ, Roper M, Wood M. A comparative evaluation of dynamic visualisation tools. Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE). IEEE Computer Society: Victoria, Canada, 2003; 80-89.
33. Zayour I. Reverse engineering: A cognitive approach, a case study and a tool. PhD Thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, May 2002.
34. Shneiderman B. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. IEEE Visual Languages. IEEE Computer Society: Silver Spring MD, U.S.A., 1996; 336-343.
35. Guéhéneuc YG, Ziadi T. Automated reverse-engineering of UML v2.0 dynamic models. Proceedings of the 6th ECOOP Workshop on Object-oriented Reengineering (WOOR), 2005. Unavailable in print. Available at: http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~ptidej/Publications/Documents/ECOOP05WOORb.doc. pdf [7 July 2008].
36. Jerding D, Rugaber S. Using visualization for architectural localization and extraction. Proceedings of the Fourth Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE). IEEE Computer Society: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; 56-65.