Modeling realistic tool-tissue interactions with haptic feedback: A learning-based method

Symposium on Haptics Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2008 - Proceedings, Haptics

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 209-215

  Pezzementi, Zachary ^a   Ursu, Daniel ^a   Misra, Sarthak ^a   Okamura, Allison M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

H.5.2 information systems : information interfaces and presentation User interfaceshaptic I O; I.6.5 computing methodologies : simulation and modeling model development

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE MODELING; BRAIN TISSUES; FE MODELLING; FE SIMULATIONS; H.5.2 [INFORMATION SYSTEMS]: INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION - USER INTERFACESHAPTIC I/O; HAPTIC DEVICES; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; HAPTIC INTERACTIONS; HAPTICS; HEURISTIC MODELS; HIGH-FIDELITY; I.6.5 [COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES]: SIMULATION AND MODELING - MODEL DEVELOPMENT; IMMERSIVE; LINEAR ELASTICITY; MASS-SPRING DAMPER SYSTEMS; MODEL-FREE; NON-LINEAR FINITE ELEMENTS; NONLINEAR VISCOELASTIC; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; PHANTOM OMNI; SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION STOCHASTIC APPROXIMATION; SOFT TISSUES; SPRING PARAMETERS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL SIMULATORS; SURGICAL TRAINING; TISSUE INTERACTIONS; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT;

APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROL THEORY; CURVE FITTING; FEEDBACK; FLOW INTERACTIONS; HAPTIC INTERFACES; HEURISTIC PROGRAMMING; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REMOTE CONTROL; SIMULATORS; SPRINGS (COMPONENTS); STOCHASTIC MODELS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TISSUE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 49749108982     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HAPTICS.2008.4479944     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. ABAQUS Inc. Rising Sun. Mills, 166 Valley Street, Providence, RI 02909 USA.
2. G. Bianchi, M. Harders, and G. Székely. Mesh topology identification for mass-spring models. In R. E. Ellis and T. M. Peters, editors, MIC-CAI (1), volume 2878 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 50-58. Springer, 2003.
3. G. Bianchi, B. Solenthaler, G. Székely, and M. Harders. Simultaneous topology and stiffness identification for mass-spring models based on fern reference deformations. In C. Barillot, D. R. Haynor, and P. Hellier, editors, MICCAI (2), volume 32.17 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 293-301. Springer, 2004.
4. Boost.org. Boost C++ Library Documentation, December 2005. Available via http://www.boost.org/.
5. S. Cotin, H. Delingette, and N. Ayache. A hybrid elastic model for real-time cutting, deformations, and force feedback for surgery training and simulation. The Visual Computer, 16(7):437-452, 2000.
6. O. Deussen, L. Kobbelt, and P. Tucke. Using simulated annealing to obtain good nodal approximations of deformable objects. In D. Terzopoulos and D. Thalmann, editors, Computer Animation and Simulation '95, pages 30-43. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
7. S. P. DiMaio and S. E. Salcudean. Needle insertion modelling and simulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19(5):864-875, October 2003.
8. Y. C. Fung. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag, second edition, 1993.
9. S. F. Gibson and B. Mirtich. A survey of deformable modeling in computer graphics. Technical report, MERL - A Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory, 1997.
10. A. E. Kerdok, S. M. Cotin, M. P. Ottensmeyer, A. M. Galea, R. D. Howe, and S. L. Dawson. Truth cube: Establishing physical standard for soft tissue simulation. Medical Image Analysis, 7:283-291, 2003.
11. K. Miller, K. Chinzei, G. Orssengo, and P. Bednarz. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. Journal of Biomechanics, 33(11):1369-1376, 2000.
12. S. Misra, A. M. Okamura, and K. T. Ramesh. Force feedback is noticeably different for linear versus nonlinear elastic tissue models. In Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (World Haptics), pages 519-524, March 2007.
13. W. Mollemans, F. Schutyser, J. Cleynenbreugel, and P. Suetens. Tetrahedral mass spring model for fast soft tissue deformation. In International Symposium on Surgery Simulation and Soft Tissue Modeling, pages 145-154, 2003.
14. D. Morris. Haptics and Physical Simulation for Virtual Bone Surgery. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 2006.
15. R. W. Ogden. Non-linear elastic deformations. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, UK, first edition, 1984.
16. C. Paloc, F. Bello, R. I. Kitney, and A. Darzi. Online multiresolution volumetric mass spring model, for real time soft tissue deformation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-Part II, pages 219-226, 2002.
17. SensAble Technologies. OpenHaptics Toolkit version 2.0 Programmer's Guide, 2005.
18. SensAble Technologies. Specifications for the PHANTOM Omni(TM) haptic device, 2005.
19. J. C. Spall. An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization. Technical Report 1, Johns Hopkins APL, 1998.
20. J. C. Spall. Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: estimation, simulation, and control. Wiley, Hoboken, USA, first edition, 2003.
21. G. Székely, C. Brechbühler, J. Dual, R. Enzler, J. Hug, R. Hutter, N. Ironmonger, M. Kauer, V. Meier, P. Niederer, A. Rhomberg, P. Schmid, G. Schweitzer, M. Thaler, V. Vuskovic, G. Tröster, U. Haller, and M. Bajka. Virtual reality-based simulation of endoscopic surgery. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9(3):310-333, 2000.
22. A. Van Gelder. Approximate simulation of elastic membranes by triangulated spring meshes. Journal of Graphics Tools, 3(2):21-41, 1998.
23. X. Wu, M. S. Downes, T. Goktekin, and F. Tendick. Adaptive non-linear finite elements for deformable body simulation using dynamic progressive meshes. In A. Chalmers and T-M. Rhyne, editors, Computer Graphics Forum, volume 20(3), pages 349-358. Blackwell Publishing, 2001.
24. H. Zhong, M. Wachowiak, and T. Peters. A real time finite element based tissue simulation method incorporating nonlinear elastic behavior. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 8(3):177-189, 2005.
25. C. Zilles and J. Salisbury. A constraint based god-object method for haptic display. In Proceedings of the IEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Human Robot Interaction, and Cooperative Robots, volume 3, pages 146-151, 1995.