Outcomes of Multiple Wire Localization for Larger Breast Cancers: When Can Mastectomy Be Avoided?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 207, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 342-346

  Kirstein, Laurie J ^a   Rafferty, Elizabeth ^a   Specht, Michelle C ^a   Moore, Richard H ^a   Taghian, Alphonse G ^a   Hughes, Kevin S ^a   Gadd, Michele A ^a   Smith, Barbara L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR BIOPSY; WIRE;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 49749105208     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Smitt M.C., Nowels K.W., Zdeblick M.J., et al. The importance of surgical margin status in the long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76 (1995) 259-267
2. Schwartz G.F., Solin L.J., Olivoto I.A., et al. The Consensus Conference on the treatment of in situ carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 88 (1999) 946-954
3. Wazer D., Schmidt-Ullrich R., Ruthazer R., et al. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45 (1999) 885-891
4. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., et al. Twenty year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy and irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1233-1241
5. Lichter A.S., Lippman M.E., Danforth D.N., et al. Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol 10 (1992) 976-983
6. Cellini C., Huston T.L., Martins D., et al. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery. Am J Surg 189 (2005) 662-666
7. Frank H.A., Hall F.M., and Steer M.E. Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography. N Engl J Med 2 (1976) 28-29
8. Silverstein M.J., Gamagami P., Rosser R.J., et al. Hooked-wire-directed breast biopsy and overpenetrated mammography. Cancer 59 (1987) 715-722
9. Liberman L., Kaplan J., Van Zee K., et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. Am J Roent 177 (2001) 565-572
10. Wallace A.M., Daniel B.L., Jeffrey S.S., et al. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance image-guided bracket wire localization. J Am Coll Surg 200 (2005) 527-537
11. Cheng L., Al-Kaisi N.K., Gordon N.H., et al. Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 89 (1997) 1356-1360
12. Neuschatz A.C., DiPetrillo T., Steinhoff M., et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 94 (2002) 1917-1924
13. Solin L.J., Fourquet A., Vicini F.A., et al. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50 (2001) 991-1002
14. Menes T.S., Tartter P.I., Bleiweiss I., et al. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear margins in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 12 (2005) 881-885
15. Harris E.E., Schultz D.J., and Jones H.A. Factors associated with residual disease on re-excision in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer J 9 (2003) 42-48
16. Vapiwala N., Harris E., Hwang W., et al. Long-term outcome for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ managed with breast conservation treatment: prognostic significance of re-excision. Cancer J 12 (2006) 25-39
17. Cordiner C.M., Letherlan J.C., and Young I.E. Does the insertion of more than one wire allow successful excision of large clusters of calcification?. Clin Radiol 61 (2006) 686-690
18. Silverstein M.J., Lagios M.D., Recht A., et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005) 586-698
19. Liberman L., Goodstine S.L., Dershaw D.D., et al. One operation after percutaneous diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer: frequency and associated factors. AJR 178 (2002) 673-679
20. Smitt M.C., Nowels K., Carlson R.W., and Jeffrey S.S. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 979-985
21. Park C.C., Mitsumori M., Nixon A., et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18 (2000) 1668-1675
22. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 383-393