Using operator workload data to inform human reliability analyses

IEEE Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 309-313

  Laux, Lila ^a   Plott, Christopher ^a  

^a ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; ERROR ANALYSIS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; NASA; POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANALYSIS PROCESS; ERROR PROBABILITIES; HUMAN FACTORS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODELING; HUMAN RELIABILITY; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; OPERATING EXPERIENCES; OPERATOR WORKLOAD; RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING; ROOT CAUSES; SELF-ASSESSMENT; WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT;

RELIABILITY;

EID: 49749103623     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HFPP.2007.4413225     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. J. H. McCracken and T. B. Aldrich, "Analyses of selected LHX mission functions: implications for operator workload and system automation goals" (Technical Note ASI479-024-84). Fort Rucker, AL, Army Research Institute Aviation Research and Development Activity, 1984.
2. S.G. Hart and L.E. Staveland, "Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research." In P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.) Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988, pp.139-183.
3. R. Laughery, B. Plott, J. Persensky, "Micro Saint as a Tool to Determine Necessary Nuclear Power Plant Operating Crew Size." American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, May 1996.
4. K. Leiden, R. Laughery, J. Keller, J. French, W. Warwick and S. Wood, "A review of human performance models for the prediction of human error." NASA Ames Research Center, 2001.
5. K. Laughery and C. Plott, "Task network modeling of human operators in nuclear power plant control rooms." Proceedings of the ANS Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, 1990.
6. S.G. Hill, H.P. Iavecchia, J.C. Byers, A.C. Bittner, Jr., A.L. Zaklad and R.E. Christ, "Comparison of Four Subjective Workload Rating Scales." Human Factors, (34) 4, 1992, pp. 429-439.
7. S. Rubio, E. Díaz, J. Martín and J. Puente, "Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and Workload Profile Methods," Applied Psychology: An International Review, (53) 1, 2004. pp.61-86.
8. C.R. Bierbaum, S.M. Szabo and T.B. Aldrich, "Task analysis of the UH-60 mission and decision rules for developing a UH-60 workload prediction model." Volume I: Summary Report (AD-A210 763). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1989.
9. H.G., Stassen, G. Johannsen, and N. Moray, "Internal representation, internal model, human performance model and mental workload," Automatica, Vol. 26, 1990, pp. 811 - 820.
10. K.C. Hendy, J. Liao, and P. Milgram, "Combining time and intensity effects in assessing operation information-processing load." Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(1). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1997.
11. NRC, "Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for a Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA)." NUREG-1624. Rev. 1. Washington, DC: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000.
12. NRC. "Standardized Plant Analysis Risk-Human Reliability Analysis" (SPAR-H, NUREG/CR-6883). Washington, DC: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005.