Comparison of the two-step and midgait methods of plantar pressure measurement in children

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 268-277

  Oladeji, Oluwabunmi ^a   Stackhouse, Carrie ^b   Gracely, Edward ^c   Orlin, Margo ^a,b,d  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOOT; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 49749102813     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. BOWEN TR, MILLER F, CASTAGNO P, ET AL: A method of dynamic foot-pressure measurement for the evaluation of pediatric orthopaedic foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 18: 789, 1998.
2. CHANG CH, MILLER F, SCHUYLER J: Dynamic pedobarograph in evaluation of varus and valgus foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 22: 813, 2002.
3. DOWLING AM, STEELE JR, BAUR LA: What are the effects of obesity in children on plantar pressure distributions? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28: 1514, 2004.
4. DOWLING AM, STEELE JR, BAUR LA: Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25: 845, 2001.
5. FEMERY V, MXORETTO P, RENAUT H, ET AL: Measurement of plantar pressure distribution in hemiplegic children: changes to adaptative gait patterns in accordance with deficiency. Clin Biomech 17: 406, 2002.
6. FERRARI J, WATKINSON D: Foot pressure measurement differences between boys and girls with reference to hallux valgus deformity and hypermobility. Foot Ankle Int 26: 739, 2005.
7. HENNIG EM: "Pedobarograph assessment in gait analysis", in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, Vol. 16, p 215, Henley and Belfus, Philadelphia, 2002.
8. ORLIN MN, MCPOIL TG: Plantar pressure assessment. Phys Ther 80: 399, 2000.
9. ROSENBAUM D, BECKER H: Plantar pressure distribution measurements. Technical background and clinical applications. J Foot Ankle Surg 3: 1, 1997.
10. BERTSCH C, UNGER H, WINKELMANN W, ET AL: Evaluation of early walking patterns from plantar pressure distribution measurements. First year results of 42 children. Gait Posture 19: 235, 2004.
11. EILS E, STREYL M, LINNENBECKER S, ET AL: Characteristic plantar pressure distribution patterns during soccer-specific movements. Am J Sports Med 32: 140, 2004.
12. HENNIG EM, ROSENBAUM D: Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison with adults. Foot Ankle 11: 306, 1991.
13. HENNIG EM, STAATS A, ROSENBAUM D: Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle Int 15: 35, 1994.
14. KELLIS E: Plantar pressure distribution during barefoot standing, walking and landing in preschool boys. Gait Posture 14: 92, 2001.
15. NAWATA K, NISHIHARA S, HAYASHI I, ET AL: Plantar pressure distribution during gait in athletes with functional instability of the ankle joint: preliminary report. J Orthop Sci 10: 298, 2005.
16. GRAVANTE G, POMARA F, RUSSO G, ET AL: Plantar pressure distribution analysis in normal weight young women and men with normal and claw feet: a cross-sectional study. Clin Anat 18: 245, 2005.
17. SCHAFF PS, CAVANAGH PR: Shoes for the insensitive foot: the effect of a "rocker bottom" shoe modification on plantar pressure distribution. Foot Ankle 11: 129, 1990.
18. WILLEMS T, WITVROUW E, DELBAERE K, ET AL: Relationship between gait biomechanics and inversion sprains: a prospective study of risk factors. Gait Posture 21: 379, 2005.
19. BRYANT A, SINGER K, TINLEY P: Comparison of the reliability of plantar pressure measurements using the two-step and midgait methods of data collection. Foot Ankle Int 20: 646, 1999.
20. HUGHES J, PRATT L, LINGE K, ET AL: Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech 6: 14, 1991.
21. VAN DER LEEDEN M, DEKKER JH, SIEMONSMA PC, ET AL: Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int 25: 739, 2004.
22. ORLIN MN, EFFGEN SK, HANDLER SD: Effect of otitis media with effusion on gross motor ability in preschool-aged children: preliminary findings. Pediatrics 99: 334, 1997.
23. MCPOIL TG, CORNWALL MW, DUPUIS L, ET AL: Variability of plantar pressure data. A comparison of the two-step and midgait methods. JAPMA 89: 495, 1999.
24. MEYERS-RICE B, SUGARS L, MCPOIL T, ET AL: Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in non-pathologic subjects. JAPMA 84: 499, 1994.
25. BRENIERE Y, DO MC: When and how does steady state gait movement induced from upright posture begin? J Biomech 19: 1035, 1986.
26. BRYANT AR, TINLEY P, SINGER KP: Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system. JAPMA 90: 295, 2000.
27. WARREN GL, MAHER RM, HIGBIE EJ: Temporal patterns of plantar pressures and lower-leg muscle activity during walking: effect of speed. Gait Posture 19: 91, 2004.
28. CAVANAGH PR, RODGERS MM, IIBOSHI A: Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle 7: 262, 1987.
29. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8: 135, 1999.
30. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476): 307, 1986.
31. BUS SA, DE LANGE A: A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech 20: 892, 2005.
32. ROSENBAUM D, HAUTMANN S, GOLD M, ET AL: Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion. Gait Posture 2: 191, 1994.
33. KERNOZEK TW, ZIMMER KA: Reliability and running speed effects of in-shoe loading measurements during slow treadmill running. Foot Ankle Int 21: 749, 2000.
34. SEGAL A, ROHR E, ORENDURFF M, ET AL: The effect of walking speed on peak plantar pressure. Foot Ankle Int 25: 926, 2004.
35. PORTNEY LG, WATKINS MP: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd Ed, p 742, Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.
36. ALTMAN DG, BLAND JM: Commentary on quantifying agreement between two methods of measurement. Clin Chem 48: 801, 2002.