Sensitivity of the acoustic scattering problem in prolate spheroidal geometry with respect to wavenumber and shape

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 185-201

  Kourounis, D ^a   Gergidis, L N ^a   Charalambopoulos, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Acoustic scattering; Arbitrary precision; L2 norm minimization; Mathematical modeling; Numerical acoustics; Prolate spheroid; Scientific computing; Vekua transformation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; ACOUSTICS; DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS; DIFFRACTIVE OPTICS; HELMHOLTZ EQUATION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; STANDARDS; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

ACOUSTIC SCATTERING; ACOUSTIC SCATTERING PROBLEM; ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; ARBITRARY PRECISION; EIGEN-SOLUTIONS; EXPANSION COEFFICIENTS; HELMHOLTZ; L2-NORM MINIMIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL ACOUSTICS; PROLATE SPHEROID; SCATTERED FIELDS; SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING; SPHEROIDAL GEOMETRY; SPHEROIDAL WAVE FUNCTIONS; VEKUA TRANSFORMATION; WAVE NUMBERS;

ACOUSTIC WAVE SCATTERING;

EID: 49749100486     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Agnantiaris, J.; Polyzos, D. (2003): A boundary element method for acoustic scattering from non-axisymmetric and axisymmetric elastic shells. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 197-212.
2. Bailey, D. H. (2004): High-precision floating-point arithmetic in scientific computation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Paper LBNL-57487. http://repositories.cdlib.org/lbnl/LBNL-57487.
3. Bailey, D. H.; Yozo, H.; Li, X. S.; Thompson, B. (2002): Arprec: An arbitrary precision computation package. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Paper LBNL-53651. http://repositories.cdlib.org/lbnl/LBNL-53651.
4. Borwein, J.; Bailey, D. (2004): Mathematics by Experiment, Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century. A.K. Peters.
5. Callsen, S.; von Estorff, O.; Zaleski, O. (2004): Direct and Indirect Approach of a Desingularized Boundary Element Formulation for Acoustical Problems. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 421-429.
6. Chandler-Wilde, S. (2007): Numerical methods for high frequency scattering problems. Zurich Summer School.
7. Chandrasekhar, B.; Rao, M. (2007): Acoustic Scattering from Fluid Bodies of Arbitrary Shape . CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 21, pp. 67-80.
8. Charalambopoulos, A.; Dassios, G. (2002): On the vekua pair in spheroidal geometry and its role in solving boundary value problems. Applicable Analysis, vol. 81, pp. 85-113.
9. Chen, H.; Fu, D. J.; Zhang, P. (2007): An Investigation of Wave Propagation with High Wave Numbers via the Regularized LBIEM. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 85-98.
10. Gergidis, L. N.; Kourounis, D.; Mavratzas, S.; Charalambopoulos, A. (2007): Acous1 tic Scattering in Prolate Spheroidal Geometry via Vekua Tranformation - Theory and Numerical results. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 21, pp. 157-175.
11. Golub, G. H.; Loan, C. V. (1996): Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3 edition.
12. Hackman, R. (1984): The transition matrix for acoustic and elastic wave scattering in prolate spheroidal coordinates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 75,pp. 35-45.
13. He, Y.; Xie, Z.; Ye, Q. (1997): Radiation and scattering of sound waves by a screened prolate spheroid. Wave motion, vol. 26, pp. 85-96.
14. Press, W.; Teukolsky, S.; Vetterling, W; Flannery, B. (2002): Numerical Recipes in C++. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
15. Qian, Z.; Han, Z.; Atluri, S. (2004): Directly derived non-hyper-singular boundary integral equations for acoustic problems, and their solution through Petrov-Galerkin schemes. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 541-562.
16. Qian, Z.; Han, Z.; Ufimtsev, P.; Atluri, S. (2004): Non-hyper-singular boundary integral equations for acoustic problems, implemented by the collocation-based boundary element method. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 133-144.
17. Shewchuk, R. (1997): Adaptive Precision Floating-Point Arithmetic and Fast Robust Geometric Predicates. Discrete & Computational Geometry, vol. 18, pp. 305-363.
18. Trefethen, L. N.; Bau, D. (1997): Numerical Linear Algebra, siam.
19. Tsai, C.; Lin, Y.; Young, D.; Atluri, S. (2006): Investigations on the accuracy and condition number for the method of fundamental solutions. CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 16, pp. 103-114.
20. Varadan, V.; Varadan, V. (1982): Computation of rigid body scattering by prolate spheroids using the t-matrix approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 71, pp. 22-25.
21. 2u = 0. Soobshcheniga Akademii Nauk Gruz. SSSR, vol 3, pp. 307-314.
22. Vekua, I. (1945): Inversion of an integral transformation and some applications. Soobshcheniga Akademii Nauk Gruz. SSSR, vol. 6, pp. 177-183.
23. Vekua, I. (1967): New Methods for Solving Elliptic Equations. North Holland Publishing Co.
24. Wang, H.; Wu, Q.; He, X.; L.Li (2005): Computation of wave scattering problems from spheric body: Derivation of the new sommerfeld-watson transformation. Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium 2005, Hangzhou, China, pp. 22-26.
25. Waterman, P. (1969): New formulation of acoustic scattering. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 45, pp.1417-1429.
26. Wolfram Research, I. (2004): Mathematica Edition: Version 5.1. Wolfram Research, Inc.
27. Zhang, S.; Jin, J. (1996): Computation of Special functions. Wiley Interscience.