Local Pareto approximation for multi-objective optimization

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 821-847

  Utyuzhnikov, Sergei ^a   Maginot, Jeremy ^b   Guenov, Marin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Approximation; Decision making; Multi objective optimization; Pareto surface; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SOLUTIONS;

APPROXIMATION; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION-MAKING; DESIGN CRITERION; DESIGN PROCESSES; LOCAL APPROXIMATION; LOCAL SENSITIVITY; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OBJECTIVE SPACES; OPTIMIZ ATION PROBLEMS; PARETO ANALYSIS; PARETO POINTS; PARETO SOLUTIONS; PARETO SURFACE; PARETO SURFACES; VARIATIONS OF; VECTOR OPTIMIZATIONS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 49749097579     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: 10290273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150802086714     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fadel, G., Konda S., Blouin, V.Y. and Wiecek, M.M., 2002, Epsilon-optimality in bi-criteria optimization, Proceedings of the 43rd Structures, Structural, Dynamics and Materials Conference, 22-25 April, Denver, Co, Alexandria, VA: AIAA.
2. Fletcher, R., 1989, Practical methods of optimization. New York: Wiley.
3. Guenov, M.D., Utyuzhnikov, S.V. and Fantini, P., 2005, Application of the modified physical programming method to generating the entire Pareto frontier in multi-objective optimization, Proceedings of the 6th Eurogen Conference, 12-14 September, Munich, Germany.
4. Hernandez, S., 1995, A general sensitivity analysis for unconstrained and constrained Pareto optima in multi-objective optimization, Proceedings of the 36th AIAA/ASME Structures Dynamics and Materials Conference, AIAA-1288-CP, 18-21 April, New Orleans, LA, Alexandria, VA: AIAA.
5. Messac, A., 1996, Physical programming effective optimization for computational design. AIAA Journal, 34 (1), 149-158.
6. Miettinen, K.M., 1999. Nonlinear multi-objective optimization. Boston: Kluwer.
7. Rosen, J.B., 1958. The gradient projection method for nonlinear programming, Part L Linear constraints. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 8 (1), 181-217.
8. Tammer, C., 1994, Stability results for approximately efficient solutions, OR Spektrum, 16 (1), 47-52.
9. Tappeta, R.V. and Renaud, J.E., 1999. Interactive multi-objective optimization procedure, AIAA 99-1207, Proceedings of the 40th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, 12-15 April, St Louis, MO, Alexandria, VA: AIAA, Vol. 1, 27-41.
10. Tappeta, R. V. Renaud, J.E., Messac, A. and Sundararaj, G.J., 2000, Interactive physical programming: trade-off analysis and decision making in multidisciplinary optimization. AIAA Journal, 38 (5), 917-926.
11. Utyuzhnikov, S.V., Guenov, M.D. and Fantini, P., 2005, Numerical method for generating the entire Pareto frontier in multi-objective optimization. Proceedings of the 6th Eurogen Conference, 12-14 September, Munich, Germany.
12. Vincent, T.L. and Grantham, W.J., 1981, Optimality in parametric systems. New York: Wiley.
13. Yang B.S., Yeun, Y.S. and Ruy, W.S., 2002, Managing approximation models in multiobjective optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 24 (2), 141-156.
14. Zhang, W.H., 2003a, Pareto sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria optimization. Finite Elements in Analysts and Design, 39 (5), 505-520.
15. Zhang, W.H., 2003b, On the Pareto optimum sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 58 (6), 955-977.