An integrated statistical approach for volume reconstruction from unregistered sequential slices

Inverse Problems

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages

  Yu, Yong ^a   Trouvé, Alain ^a   Wang, Jiaping ^a,b   Chalmond, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; RESTORATION; STATISTICAL METHODS; VOLUME MEASUREMENT;

AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; ENERGY MINIMIZATIONS; ENERGY PARAMETERS; OBJECT OF INTEREST; STATISTICAL APPROACHES; STATISTICAL FORMULATION; VOLUME RECONSTRUCTION;

REPAIR;

EID: 49749097178     PISSN: 02665611     EISSN: 13616420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/4/045004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Yu Y, Trouvé A and Chalmond B 2007 A Bayesian 3d volume reconstruction for confocal micro-rotation cell imaging MICCAI 2007 vol 2 ed A Maeder, N Ayache and S Ourselin (Berlin: Springer) pp 685-92
2. Renaud O, Vina J, Yu Y, Machu C, Trouvé A, Van der Voort H, Chalmond B and Shorte S L 2008 High-resolution imaging of living cells in flow suspension using axial-tomography: 3d imaging flow cytometry Biotechnology J. 3 53-62
3. Bradl J, Rinke B, Schneider B, Edelman P, Hausmann M and Cremer C 1996 Resolution improvement in 3D microscopy by object tilting Microsc. Anal. 44 9-11
4. Cogswell C J, Larkin K G and Klemm H U 1996 Fluorescence micro-tomography: multi-angle image acquisition and 3d reconstruction Proc. SPIE vol 2655
5. Heintzmann R and Cremer C 2002 Axial tomographic confocal fluorescence microscopy J. Microsc. 206 7-23
6. Kawata S 1994 The optical computed tomography microscope Adv. Opt. Electron. Microsc. 14 213-48
7. Sharpe J, Ahlgren U, Perry P, Hill B, Ross A, Hecksher-Sorensen J, Baldock R and Davidson D 2002 Optical projection tomography as tool for 3d microscopy and gene expression studies Science 296 541-5
8. Shaw P J, Agard D A, Hiraoka Y and Sedat J W 1989 Tilted view reconstruction in optical microscopy: three-dimensional reconstruction of drosophila melanogaster embryo nuclei Biophys. J. 55 101-10
9. Schnelle T, Hagedorm R, Fuhr G, Fielder S and Muller T 1993 Three-dimensional electric field traps for manipulation of cells-calculation and experimental verification Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1157 127-40
10. Woods N A, Galatsanos N P and Katsaggelos A K 2003 Em-based simultaneous registration, restoration and interpolation of super-resolved images IEEE ICIP
11. Chiuso A, Brocket R and Soatto S 1998 Optimal structure from motion: Local ambiguities and global estimates IEEE CVPR
12. Basu S and Bresler Y 2000 Uniqueness of tomography with unknown view angles IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9 1094-106
13. Basu S and Bresler Y 2000 Feasibility of tomography with unknown view angles IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9 1107-22
14. Salzman D 1990 A method of general moments for orienting 2d projections of unkown 3d objects Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing 50 129-56
15. Penczek P A, Zhu J and Frank J 1996 A common-lines based method for determining orientations for n > 3 particle projections simultaneously Ultramicroscopy 63 205-18
16. Lauren P D and Nandhakumar N 1997 Estimating the viewing parameters of random, noisy projections of asymmetric objects for tomographic reconstruction IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19 417-30
17. Matheron G 1981 Splines and kriging: their formal equivalence Down-to-Earth Statistics: Solutions Looking for Geological Problems ed D F Merriam pp 77-95
18. Unser M 2000 Sampling-50 years after shannon Proc. IEEE 88 569-87
19. Chalmond B 2003 Modeling and Inverse Problems in Image Analysis (New York: Springer)
20. Cressie N A 1993 Statistics for Spatial Data (New York: Wiley)
21. Kent J T and Mardia K V 1994 The link between kriging and thin plates Probability, Statistics and Optimization ed F P Keller (New York: Wiley)
22. Wahba G 1999 Support vector machines, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and the randomized GACV Advances in Kernel Methods (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA) pp 69-88
23. Roerdink J B T M 1992 Computerized tomography and its applications: a guided tour Niew Archief voor Wiskunde 10 277-308
24. Brandt S and Kolehmainen V 2007 Structure-from-motion without correspondence from tomographic projections by bayesian inversion theory IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26 417-30
25. Chalmond B, Coldefy F and Lavayssiére B 1999 Tomographic reconstruction from non-calibrated noisy projections in non-destructive evaluation Inverse problem 15 339-411
26. Geman S and McLure D E 1985 Bayesian image analysis: An application to single photon emission Proc. Statistical Computing Section (Washington, DC: American Statistical Society) pp 12-23
27. Ma Y, Soatto S, Kosecka Shankar J and Sastry S 2004 An Invitation to 3-D Vision from Images to Geometric Models (Berlin: Springer)
28. Yang C, Duraiswami R, Gumerov N and Davis L 2003 Improved fast gauss transform and efficient kernel density estimation IEEE ICCV pp 464-71
29. Marquardt D 1963 An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters SIAM J. Appl. Math. 11 431-41
30. Golub G H and Van Loan C F 1989 Matrix Computations (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press)
31. LeSaux B, Chalmond B, Yu Y, Trouvé A, Renaud O and Shorte S L 2008 Micro-rotation imaging deconvolution Proc. Int. Symp. on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE)
32. LeSaux B, Chalmond B, Yu Y, Trouvé A, Renaud O and Shorte S L 2008 Isotropic high resolution 3d confocal micro-rotation imaging for non-adherent living cells submitted
33. Shorte S L and Bolsover S 1999 Imaging reality: understanding maps of physiology cell signals measured by fluorescence microscopy and digital imaging Florescent and Luminescent Probes 2nd edn (New York: Academic) pp 94-106