Comparison of supervised classification methods for protein profiling in cancer diagnosis

Cancer Informatics

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 295-305

  Dossat, Nadège ^a,e   Mangé, Alain ^a,b,c   Solassol, Jérôme ^a,b,c   Jacot, William ^a,b   Lhermitte, Ludovic ^a,b,c   Maudelonde, Thierry ^a,b,c   Daurès, Jean Pierre ^a,d   Molinari, Nicolas ^a,d  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b HÔPITAL ARNAUD DE VILLENEUVE   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Logistic regression; Mass spectrometry; Supervised classifications; Wilcoxon's test

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PROTEOMICS; SURFACE ENHANCED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 49649120125     PISSN: 11769351     EISSN: 11769351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/117693510700300023     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adam, B.L., Qu, Y., Davis, J.W. et al. 2002. Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. Cancer Res., 62:3609-14.
2. Ambroise, C. and McLachlan, G.J. 2002. Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99(10):6562-6.
3. Bauer, E. and Kohavi, R. 1999. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning, 36:105-39.
4. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate - a pratical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J.R. Stat. Soc. B.57:289-300.
5. Chen, Y.-D., Zheng, S., Yu J.-K. et al. 2004. Artificial neural networks analysis of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectra of serum protein pattern distinguishes colorectal cancer from healthy population. Clin. Cancer Res., 10(04):8380-5.
6. Dreyfus, G., Martinez, J.-M., Samuelides, M. et al. 2002. Réseaux de neurones: méthodologie et application. Paris: Eyrolles.
7. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E. and Stork, D.G. 2001. Pattern classification. John Wiley and son, Inc., New York.
8. Fushiki T., Fujisawa H., Eguchi S. 2006. Identification of biomarkers from mass spectrometry data using a "common" peak approach. B.M.C. Bioinformatics, 7:358.
9. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York, Springer.
10. Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression (Second Edition). New York; Chichester: Wiley.
11. Lee, M.-L, T. 2004. Analysis of Microarray Gene Expression Data. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Li L., Tang, H., Wu, Z., Gong, J. et al. 2004. Data mining techniques for cancer detection using serum proteomic profiling. Artif. Intell. Med., 32(2):71-83.
13. Nakache, J.-P. and Confais, J. 2003. Statistique explicative appliquée. Paris: Technip.
14. Pepe, M.S., Cai, T. and Longton, G. 2006. Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Biometrics, 62(1):221-9.
15. Petricoin, E.F., Ardekani, A.M., Hitt, B.A. et al. 2002. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet, 359:572-7.
16. Solassol, J., Jacot, W., Lhermitte, L. et al. 2006. Clinical proteomics and mass spectrometry profiling for cancer detection. Expert Rev. Proteomics, 3:311-20.
17. Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley.
18. Vlahou, A., Schorge, J.O., Gregory, B.W. et al. 2003. Diagnosis of ovarian cancer using decision tree classification of mass spectral data. J. Biomed. Biotechnolo., 5:308-14.
19. Verhoeven, K.J.F., Simonsen, K.L. and McIntyre, L.M. 2005. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos, 108(3):643-47.
20. Webb, A. 2002. Statistical Pattern Recognition (Second Edition). Wiley.
21. Wu, B., Abbott, T., Fishman, D. et al. 2003. Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics, 19(13):1636-43.
22. Yang, S.-Y., Xiao, X.-Y. and Zhang, W.-G. 2005. Application of serum SELDI proteomic patterns in diagnosis of lung cancer. BMC cancer, 5:83.
23. Zhang, Z., Bast, R.C. Jr., Yu, Y. et al. 2004. Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Res., 64:5882-90.