Apsáalooke women's experiences with Pap test screening

Cancer Control

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 166-173

  Smith, Adina J ^a   Christopher, Suzanne ^a   LaFromboise, Victoria R ^b   Letiecq, Bethany L ^a   McCormick, Alma Knows His Gun ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOM SAMPLE; SOCIAL STATUS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 49649119986     PISSN: 10732748     EISSN: 15262359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107327480801500209     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Espey D, Paisano RE, Cobb N. Regional patterns and trends in cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990-2001. Cancer. 2005;103:1045-1053.
2. Billings Area Indian Health Service Office. Pap smear trend data 2007.
3. Dignan M, Michielutte R, Blinson K, et al. Effectiveness of health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among eastern-band Cherokee Indian women in North Carolina. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1670-1676.
4. Strickland CJ, Chrisman NJ, Yallup M, et al. Walking the journey of womanhood: Yakama Indian women and Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening. Public Health Nurs. 1996;13:141-150.
5. Burhansstipanov L. Urban native American health issues. Cancer. 2000;88(5 suppl):1207-1213.
6. Frisch LL, Allen GD, Padonu G, et al. Social influences on Pap smear screening frequency. Alaska Med. 2000;42:41-47.
7. Lawrence J. The Indian Health Service and the sterilization of Native American women. Am Indian Q. 2000;24:400-419.
8. US Commission on Civil Rights. Broken Promises: Evaluating the Native American Health Care System. Washington, DC: US Commission on Civil Rights; 2004. http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/nahealth/nabroken.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2008.
9. Westmoreland TM, Watson KR. Redeeming hollow promises: the case for mandatory spending on health care for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:600-605. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
10. Burhansstipanov L, Hollow W. Native American cultural aspects of oncology nursing care. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2001;17:206-219.
11. Shi L, Forrest CB, Von Schrader S, et al. Vulnerability and the patient-practitioner relationship: the roles of gatekeeping and primary care performance. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:138-144.
12. Beach MC, Sugarman J, Johnson RL, et al. Do patients treated with dignity report higher satisfaction, adherence, and receipt of preventive care? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:331-338.
13. Stepanikova I, Mollborn S, Cook KS, et al. Patients' race, ethnicity, language, and trust in a physician. J Health Soc Behav. 2006;47:390-405.
14. Donohue RK. Nurse practitioner-client interaction as resource exchange in a women's health clinic: an exploratory study. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:717-725.
15. Balkrishnan R, Dugan E, Camacho FT, et al. Trust and satisfaction with physicians, insurers, and the medical profession. Med Care. 2003;41:1058-1064.
16. Kao AC, Green DC, Davis NA, et al. Patients' trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:681-686.
17. Thom DH, Campbell B. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:169-176.
18. Joos SK, Hickam DH, Gordon GH, et al. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:147-155.
19. Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583-589.
20. Saha S, Arbelaez JJ, Cooper LA. Patient-physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1713-1719.
21. Carrasquillo O, Ferry DH, Edwards J, et al. Eligibility for government insurance if immigrant provisions of welfare reform are repealed. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1680-1682.
22. Doescher MP, Saver BG, Franks P, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9: 1156-1163.
23. Hankins GD, Shaw SB, Cruess DF, et al. Patient satisfaction with collaborative practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:1011-1015.
24. Spector RE. Cultural Diversity in Health & Illness. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2004.
25. Sanchez TR, Plawecki JA, Plawecki HM. The delivery of culturally sensitive health care to Native Americans. J Holist Nurs. 1996;14:295-307.
26. Burhansstipanov L. Cancer research among Native American peoples. Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Cancer Nursing Research. Atlanta, GA. American Cancer Society Pub. No. 94-25M-No. 3072. 1994.
27. Christopher S, McCormick AK, Smith A, et al. Development of an interviewer training manual for a cervix health project on the Apsáalooke reservation. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:414-422.
28. Christopher S, Burhansstipanov L, McCormick AK. Using a CBPR approach to develop an interviewer training manual with members of the Apsáalooke Nation. In: Israel BA, Eng E, Schultz AJ, et al, eds. Methods in Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005:128-145.
29. Christopher S. Recommendations for conducting successful research with Native Americans. J Cancer Educ. 2005;20(1 suppl):47-51.
30. Smith A, Christopher S, McCormick AK. Development and implementation of a culturally sensitive cervical health survey: a community-based participatory approach. Women Health. 2004;40:67-86.
31. Davis SM, Reid R. Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(4 suppl):755S-759S.
32. Sobeck JL, Chapleski EE, Fisher C. Conducting research with American Indians: a case study of motives, methods, and results. J Ethnic Cult Divers Soc Work. 2003;12:69-84.
33. Crazy Bull C. Advice for the non-Native researcher. Tribal College J Am Indian Higher Educ. 1997;9:24.
34. Horner RD, Salazar W, Geiger HJ, et al. Changing healthcare professionals' behaviors to eliminate disparities in healthcare: What do we know? How might we proceed? Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:SP12-SP19.
35. Banner RO, DeCambra H, Enos R, et al. A breast and cervical cancer project in a Native Hawaiian community: Wai'anae cancer research project. Prev Med. 1995;24:447-453.
36. Banner RO, Gotay CC, Enos R, et al. Effects of a Culturally-Tailored Intervention to Increase Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Native Hawaiians. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1999:45-55.
37. Bell RA, Dignan MB, Michielutte R, et al. Cervical cancer education for Native American women in North Carolina: the North Carolina Native American Prevention Project. In: Glover CS, Hodge FS, eds. Native Outreach: A Report to American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Communities: Executive Summary. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute; NIH Pub No 98-4341. 1999:33-44.
38. Lanier AP, Kelly J, Berner J. The Alaska Native women's health project to reduce cervical cancer. In: Glover CS, Hodge FS, eds. Native Outreach: A Report to the American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities: Executive Summary. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; NIH Pub No 98-4341. 1999;23-32.
39. Matsunaga DS, Enos R, Gotay CC, et al. Participatory research in a Native Hawaiian community: the Wai'anae cancer research project. Cancer. 1996;78(7 suppl):1582-1586.
40. Berg BL. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1998.
41. Patton MQ. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1987.
42. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990.
43. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
44. Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1992.
45. Huberman AM, Miles MB. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994:428-445.
46. National Native American AIDS Prevention Center. Clinician's Guide: Working with Native Americans Living with HIV. Oakland, CA: NNAAPC; 2002. http://www.nnaapc.org. Accessed January 9, 2008.
47. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, et al. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:351-377.
48. Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining healthy environments: toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47:6-22.
49. Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL. The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10:247-251.