Human interactions with the earth system: People and pixels revisited

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1458-1471

  Liverman, David M ^a   Cuesta, Rosa Maria Roman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Earth system science; Land use change; Mexico; Social science

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; EARTH SCIENCES; FLOW INTERACTIONS; FORECASTING; FORESTRY; FUSION REACTIONS; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LAND USE; LANDFORMS; NUCLEAR PHYSICS; POPULATION STATISTICS; REMOTE SENSING; RESEARCH; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPACE OPTICS; WATER;

BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING; CASE STUDIES; EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE; EARTH SYSTEMS; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMAN INTERACTIONS; HUMAN USE; LAND-USE AND LAND-COVER CHANGE; LAND-USE CHANGE; MEXICO; MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING; REGIONAL SCALES; RESEARCH EFFORTS; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; SOCIAL PROCESSES; SOCIAL SCIENCE; SOCIAL SCIENTISTS; SOCIO-ECONOMIC;

NATURAL SCIENCES;

HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 49649110375     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1715     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alix-Garcia J, de Janvry A, Sadoulet E. 2005. A tale of two communities: explaining deforestation in Mexico. World Development 33(2): 219-235.
2. Allen MR. 2003. Liability for climate change. Nature 421: 891-892.
3. Allen R, Barnes J. 1985. The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75: 163-184.
4. Barbier EB, Burgess JC. 1996. Economic analysis of deforestation in Mexico Environment and Development Economics 1(2): 203-240.
5. Boserup E. 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. Aldine: Chicago.
6. Bray DB, Ellis EA, Armijo-Canto N. 2004. The institutional drivers of sustainable landscapes: a case study of the 'Mayan Zone' in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Land Use Policy 21: 333-346.
7. Costanza R. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 259.
8. Costanza R, Graumlich L, Steffen W (eds). 2007. Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth. Dahlem Workshop Series, MIT Press: Boston.
9. Daily GC, Ellison K. 2002. The New Economy of Nature: the Quest to Make Conservation Profitable. Island Press: Washington, DC.
10. Deininger KW, Minten B. 1999. Poverty, policies, and deforestation: the case of Mexico. Economic Development and Cultural Change 47(2): 313-344.
11. Doll CH, Muller J-P, Elvidge CD. 2000. Night-time imagery as a tool for global mapping of socioeconomic parameters and greenhouse gas emissions. AMBIO: a Journal of the Human Environment 29(3): 157-162.
12. Ecological Society of America. 1997. Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in Ecology 2: 3.
13. Elfreth Watkins Jr J. 2002. What may happen in the next hundred years (Ladies' Home Journal Dec 1900). In Eve's Century, Varty A (ed.). Routledge: London; 34-38.
14. ESSR 2006. Earth System Science Partnership. http://wwwessporg/.
15. Esty DC, Winston AS. 2006. Green to Gold: How Smart Companies Use Environmental Strategy to Innovate, Create Value, and Build Competitive Advantage. Yale University Press: Yale, CT.
16. Food and Agriculture Organization. 1997. FAO Statistical Development Series: Report on the 1990 World Census of Agriculture International Comparison and Primary Results by Country (1986-1995). UN Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome.
17. Geist HJ, Lambin EF. 2001. What Drives Tropical Deforestation? A Meta-analysis of Proximate and Underlying Causes of Deforestation Based on Subnational Case Study Evidence. LUCC Report Series No. 4, LUCC International Project Office, University of Louvain: Louvain la Neuve, Belgium.
18. Geoghegan J, Cortina Villar S, Klepeis P et al. 2001. Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 85(1-3): 25-46.
19. Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
20. Hibbard KA, Crutzen PJ, Lambin EF et al. 2007. Decadal-scale interactions of humans and the environment. In Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth. Dahlem Workshop Series, Costanza R, Graumlich L, Steffen W (eds). MIT Press: Boston; 341-178.
21. IPCC 2001. Summary for Policy Makers: Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation & Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva.
22. Lambin E, Geist H (eds). 2006. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
23. Lambin EF, Turner BL II, Geist H et al. 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change - moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11: 2-13.
24. Leach M, Faithead J. 2000. Challenging neo-Malthusian deforestation analyses in West Africa's dynamic forest landscapes. Population and Development Review 26(1): 17-43.
25. Lesschen JP, Verburg PH, Staal SJ. 2005. Statistical Methods for Analysing the Spatial Dimension of Changes in Land Use and Farming Systems. LUCC Report Series No. 7, LUCC Focus 3 Office, Wageningen University.
26. Liverman DM. 1990. Drought impacts in Mexico: climate, agriculture, technology, and land tenure in Sonora and Puebla. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80(1): 49-72.
27. Liverman DM. 1994. Modeling social systems and their interaction with the environment: a view from geography. In Integrated Regional Models: Interactions Between Humans and Their Environment, Goffman PM, Likens GE (eds). Chapman and Hall: New York; 86-103.
28. Liverman DM, Moran E, Rindfuss R, Stern P (eds). 1998. People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
29. Mas J-F, Velazquez A, Palacio-Prieto JL, Bocco G, Peralta A, Prado J. 2002. Assessing forest resources in Mexico: wall-to-wall land use/cover mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68(10): 966-968.
30. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Forest and woodland systems. In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Volume 2, Scenarios, Carpenter SR, Pingali PL, Bennett EM, Zurek MB (eds). Island Press: Washington, DC; 515.
31. Ochoa-Gaona S, Gonzalez-Espinosa M. 2000. Land use and deforestation in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Applied Geography 20(1): 17-42.
32. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actio. Cambridge University Press.
33. Parker DC, Manson SM, Janssen MA, Hoffmann MJ, Deadman P. 2003. Multi-agent system models for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(2): 314-337.
34. Paulson LJ. 1999. Globalization and Survival of the Smallholder: the Role of Agricultural Restructuring in Land Use Change in Michoacán, Mexico. Latin American Studies, University of Arizona: Tucson.
35. Pontius R, Huffaker D, Denman K. 2004. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Eclolgical Modelling 179(4): 445-461.
36. Rindfuss R, Walsh S, Turner B, Fox J, Mishra V. 2004. Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(39): 13976-13981.
37. SEMARNAT. 2002. Informe de la situación general del medio ambiente en México, 2002. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente Y Recursos Naturales: Mexico City.
38. Sutton P. 1997. Modeling population density with night-time satellite imagery and GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 21(3-4): 227-244.
39. Turner II BL, Geoghegan J, Foster DR (eds). 2004. Integrated Land-change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: Final frontiers. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
40. UNEAO. 1993. Forest Resource Assessment 1990. Tropical Countries Forestry Paper 112, Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome.
41. United Nations. 2005. World Population Prospects: the 2004 Revision. United Nations: New York.
42. Vasquez-Leon M, Liverman D. 2004. The political ecology of land-use change: affluent ranchers and destitute farmers in the Mexican municipio of Alamos. Human Organization 63(1): 21-33.
43. Velázquez A, Mas JF, Palacio JL. 2002. Análisis del cambio de uso del suelo: Mapas del Análisis del cambio de uso del suelo. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City.
44. Watson R, Noble I, Bolin B, Ravindranath N, Verardo D, Dokken D (eds). 2000. Land Use, Land- Use Change, and Forestry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Wood C, Skole D. 1998. Linking satellite, census, and survey data to study deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science. Liverman DM, Moran E, Rindfuss R, Stern P (eds). Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, National Academy Press: Washington DC; 70-93.
46. World Bank. 2006. State of the Carbon Market. World Bank: Washington.