Video streaming over the internet with optimal bandwidth resource allocation

Multimedia Tools and Applications

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 111-134

  Luo, Hongli ^a   Shyu, Mei Ling ^b   Chen, Shu Ching ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^b University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Congestion control; Optimal bandwidth allocation; Quality of service; Video streaming

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC STREAMING; IMAGE COMPRESSION; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; PACKET NETWORKS; PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SCHEDULING; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; VIDEO STREAMING; VIDEOTEX;

ADAPTIVE FRAMEWORK; BAND-WIDTH ALLOCATION; BANDWIDTH RESOURCES; CLIENT BUFFER; COMPRESSED VIDEO STREAM; CONGESTION CONTROL; FAIR SHARING; H.264 VIDEO; INTERNET ENVIRONMENT; JOINT DESIGNS; MULTIMEDIA FLOWS; NETWORK RESOURCES; OPTIMAL BANDWIDTH ALLOCATION; PACKET SCHEDULING; PEAK SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; QUALITY OF SERVICE; RATE CONTROL; SIMULATION RESULTS; TRANSMISSION RATES; VIDEO FRAMES; VIDEO QUALITY; VISUAL QUALITIES;

BANDWIDTH;

EID: 49649096116     PISSN: 13807501     EISSN: 15737721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-007-0187-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bajic IV, Tickoo O, Kalyanaraman AS, Woods JW (2003) Integrated end-to-end buffer management and congestion control for scalable video communications. In: IEEE ICIP'03, Barcelona, September 2003, pp 257-260
2. Balk A, Gerla M, Maggiorini D, Sanadidi MY (2004) Adaptive video streaming: pre-encoded MPEG-4 with bandwidth scaling. Comput Networks 44(4):415-439
3. Bansal D, Balakrishnan H (2001) Binomial congestion control algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM'01, Anchorage, pp 631-640
4. Bouras C, Gkamas A, Karaliotas A, Stamos K (2004) Architecture and performance evaluation for redundant multicast transmission supporting adaptive QoS. J Multimedia Tools Appl 25(1):85-110
5. Cai L, Shen X, Pan J, Mark JW (2005) Performance analysis of TCP-friendly AIMD algorithms for multimedia applications. IEEE Trans Multimedia 7(2):339-353
6. Chen I-R, Li S-T, Yen I-L (2005) Adaptive QoS control based on benefit optimization for video servers providing differentiated services. J Multimedia Tools Appl 25(2):167-185
7. Chen S-C, Shyu M-L, Gray I, Luo H (2005) An adaptive rate-control streaming mechanism with optimal buffer utilization. J Syst Softw 75(3):271-282 (special issue on adaptive multimedia computing)
8. Chou P, Miao Z (2006) Rate-distortion optimized streaming of packetized media. IEEE Trans Multimedia 8(2):390-404
9. Cuetos P, Ross K (2003) Optimal streaming of layered video: joint scheduling and error concealment. In: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on Multimedia, Berkeley, CA, pp 55-64
10. Dong J, He C, Zheng YF, Ewing RL (2005) AVP: a highly efficient transport protocol for low bit rate multimedia communications. J Multimedia Tools Appl 25(2):187-216
11. Floyd S, Handley M, Padhye JM, Widmer J (2000) Equation-based congestion control for unicast applications. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Stockholm, August 2000, pp 43-56
12. Jin S, Guo L, Matta I, Bestavros A (2003) A spectrum of TCP-friendly widow-based congestion control algorithms. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 11(3):341-355
13. Kang SH, Zakhor A (2003) Effective bandwidth based scheduling for streaming multimedia. In: Proceedings of ICIP, Barcelona, September 2003, pp 633-636
14. Kim Y-G, Kim J, Kuo C-CJ (2004) TCP-friendly internet video with smooth and fast rate adaptation and network-aware error control. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 4(2): 256-268
15. Krasic C, Walpole J, Feng W (2003) Quality-adaptive media streaming by priority drop. In: NOSSDAV. Monterey, June 2003, pp 112-121
16. Kusmierek E, Du DHC (2005) Streaming video delivery over internet with adaptive end-to-end QoS. J Syst Softw 75(3):237-252
17. Luo H, Shyu M-L, Chen S-C (2005) A multi-buffer scheduling scheme for video streaming. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME), Amsterdam, 6-8 July 2005, pp 1218-1221
18. Luo H, Shyu M-L, Chen S-C (2006) An optimal resource utilization scheme with end-to-end congestion control for continuous media stream transmission. Comput Networks 50(7):921-937
19. Mielke M, Aygun R, Song Y, Zhang A (2002) Plus: probe-loss utilization streaming mechanism for distributed multimedia presentation systems. IEEE Trans Multimedia 4(4):561-577
20. Joint Video Team of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG (2002) Joint model number 1, revision 1 (JM-1R1)
21. Rejaie R, Handley M, Estrin D (1999) RAP: an end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the internet. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM 99, New York, March 1999, pp 1337-1345
22. Rhee I, Xu L (2005) Limitations in equation-based congestion control. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM. Philadelphia, PA, August 2005, pp 49-60
23. Tunali ET, Kantarci A, Ozbek N (2005) Robust quality adaptation for internet video streaming. J Multimedia Tools Appl 27(3):431-448
24. Vieron J, Guillemot C (2004) Real-time constrained TCP-compatible rate control for video over the internet. IEEE Trans Multimedia 6(3):634-646
25. Wang B, Kurose JF, Sheony PJ, Towsley DF (2004) Multimedia streaming via TCP. In: ACM Multimedia, New York City, NY, October 2004, pp 908-915
26. Widmer J, Denda R, Mauve M (2001) A survey on TCP-friendly congestion control. IEEE Netw 15(3):28-37
27. Wu D, Hou YT, Zhang Y-Q (2000) Transporting real-time video over the internet: challenges and approaches. Proc IEEE 88(12):1855-1877
28. Zhang Q, Zhu W, Zhang YQ (2001) Resource allocation for multimedia streaming over the internet. IEEE Trans Multimedia 3(3):339-355
29. Zhu P, Zeng W, Li C (2007) Joint design of source rate control and QoS aware congestion control for video streaming over the internet. IEEE Trans Multimedia 9(2):366-376
30. Ziviani A, Wolfinger BE, de Rezende JF, Duarte OCMB, Fdida S (2005) Joint adoption of QoS scheme for MPEG streams. J Multimedia Tools Appl 26(1):59-80