Electrokinetic migration of permanganate through low-permeability media

Ground Water

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 629-637

  Reynolds, David A ^a   Jones, Edward H ^a   Gillen, Mike ^a   Yusoff, Ismail ^b   Thomas, David G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^c GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLIED ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROKINETIC; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; GLASS BEAD; IN-SITU; LOW PERMEABILITY; MIGRATION RATES; ORGANIC CONTAMINANT; POROUS MEDIA; POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REMEDIATION METHODS; SOIL AND SEDIMENT; SWEEP EFFICIENCY; TWO STAGE;

CAPILLARITY; CLAY MINERALS; DISSOLUTION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROMIGRATION; FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; POROUS MATERIALS; POTASSIUM;

QUALITY CONTROL;

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CLAY; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROKINESIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MANGANESE; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; OXIDATION; PERMEABILITY; POTASSIUM; REMEDIATION;

MANGANESE DERIVATIVE; OXIDE; PERMANGANIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PERMEABILITY;

ELECTROCHEMISTRY; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; OXIDES; PERMEABILITY;

EID: 49649091095     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00415.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Acar, Y.B., and A.N. Alshawabkeh. 1993. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science and Technology 27, no. 13: 2638-2647.
2. Chang, J.-H., and S.-F. Cheng. 2006. The remediation performance of a specific electrokinetics integrated with zerovalent metals for perchloroethylene contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 131, no. 1-3: 153-162.
3. Cherry, J.A., S. Feenstra, and D.M. MacKay. 1996. Concepts for the remediation of sites contaminated with dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs). In Dense Chlorinated Solvents and Other DNAPLs in Ground Water: History, Behaviour, and Remediation, ed. J.F. Pankow and J.A. Cherry, 475-506. Portland, Oregon: Waterloo Press. Electrokinetic Limited. 2004. Electrokinetic Limited. http://www.electrokinetic.co.uk/technology.html(accessed July 4, 2006).
4. Kaslusky, S.F., and K.S. Udell. 2005. Co-injection of air and steam for the prevention of downward migration of DNAPLs during steam enhanced extraction: An experimental evaluation of optimum injection ratio predictions. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 77, no. 4: 325-347.
5. Lemke, L., and L.M. Abriola. 2006. Modeling dense nonaqueous phase liquid mass removal in nonuniform formations: Linking source-zone architecture and system response. Geosphere 2, no. 2: 74-82.
6. Lofgren, M., and I. Neretnieks. 2006. Through-electromigration: A new method of investigating pore connectivity and obtaining formation factors. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 87, no. 3-4: 237-252.
7. Moon, J.-W., H.-S. Moon, H. Kim, and Y. Roh. 2005. Remediation of TCE-contaminated ground water using zero valent iron and direct current: Experimental results and electron competition. Environmental Geology 48, no. 6: 805-817.
8. NRC. 2004. Contaminants in the Subsurface: Source Zone Assessment and Remediation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
9. Reynolds, D.A., and B.H. Kueper. 2002. Numerical examination of the factors controlling DNAPL migration through a single fracture. Ground Water 40, no. 4: 368-377.
10. Roulier, M., M. Kemper, A.-A. Souhail, L. Murdoch, P. Cluxton, J.-L Chen, and W. Davis-Hoover. 2000. Feasibility of electrokinetic soil remediation in horizontal LASAGNA cells. Journal of Hazardous Materials 77, no. 1-3: 161-176.
11. Saichek, R.E., and K.R. Reddy. 2005. Electrokinetically enhanced remediation of hydrophobic organic compounds in soils: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 35, no. 2: 115-192.
12. U.S. EPA. 2003. The DNAPL remediation challenge: Is there a case for source depletion? In Expert Panel on DNAPL Remediation, EPA/600/R-03/143, ed. M.C. Kavanaugh and P.S.C. Rao. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA.
13. U.S. EPA. 1996. LASAGNA Public-Private Partnership (EPA542-F-97-012A, September 1996). Washington, D.C.: Office of Research and Development and Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
14. Weng, C.-H., C. Yuan, and H.-H. Tu. 2003. Removal of trichloroethylene from clay soil by series-electrokinetic process. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste Management 7, no. 1: 25-30.
15. West, L.J., and D.I. Stewart. 1995. Effect of zeta potential on soil electrokinesis. In Geoenvironment 2000, ed. Akar, Y.B. and Daniel, D.E., 1535-1549. ASCE Special Publication 46.