Intramodal and crossmodal processing delays in the attentional blink paradigm revealed by event-related potentials

Psychophysiology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 794-803

  Ptito, Alexia ^a,c   Arnell, Karen ^b   Jolicœur, Pierre ^a   MacLeod, Jeffrey ^b  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE ET COGNITION   (Canada)

^b BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bottleneck; Human electrophysiology; Task switching; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; CALCULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; BLINKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 49649089258     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00677.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arnell, K. M. (2006). Visual, auditory, and cross-modality dual-task costs: Electrophysiological evidence for an amodal bottleneck on working memory consolidation. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 447 457.
2. Arnell, K. M. Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105 147.
3. Arnell, K. M., Helion, A. M., Hurdelbrink, J. A. Pasieka, B. (2004). Dissociating sources of dual-task interference using human electrophysiology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 77 83.
4. Arnell, K. M. Jenkins, R. (2004). Revisiting within modality and cross-modality attentional blinks: Effects of target-distractor similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1147 1161.
5. Arnell, K. M. Jolicœur, P. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 630 648.
6. Arnell, K. M. Larson, J. M. (2002). A cross-modality attentional blink without task-set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 497 506.
7. Brisson, B. Jolicœur, P. (2007). Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3038 3053.
8. Broadbent, D. E. Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105 113.
9. Chun, M. M. (1998). Types and tokens in visual processing: A double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 738 755.
10. Chun, M. M. Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109 127.
11. De Jong, R. (1995). The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 2 25.
12. De Jong, R. Sweet, J. B. (1994). Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 142 151.
13. Dell'Acqua, R., Jolicœur, P., Pesciarelli, F., Job, R. Palomba, D. (2003). Electrophysiological evidence of visual encoding deficits in a cross-modal attentional blink paradigm. Psychophysiology, 40, 629 639.
14. Dell'Acqua, R., Jolicœur, P., Sessa, P. Turatto, M. (2006). Attentional blink and selection in the tactile domain. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 537 559.
15. Dell'Acqua, R., Jolicœur, P., Vespignani, F. Toffanin, P. (2005). Central processing overlapmodulates P3 latency. Experimental Brain Research, 165, 54 68.
16. Dell'Acqua, R., Turatto, M. Jolicœur, P. (2001). Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 777 789.
17. DiLollo, V., Kawahara, J., Shahab Ghorashi, S. M. Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191 200.
18. Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!... Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 493 513.
19. Donchin, E. Coles, M. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 11, 357 427.
20. Duncan, J., Martens, S. Ward, R. (1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature, 387, 808 810.
21. Giesbrecht, B. L. DiLollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by item substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454 1466.
22. Hansen, J. C. Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuropsychophysiology, 49, 277 290.
23. Hillstrom, A. P., Shapiro, K. L. Spence, C. (2002). Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1068 1081.
24. Jolicœur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014 1032.
25. Jolicœur, P. (1999a). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1097 1113.
26. Jolicœur, P. (1999b). Dual-task interference and visual incoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596 616.
27. Jolicœur, P. (1999c). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 87 92.
28. Jolicœur, P. Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138 202.
29. Jolicœur, P. Dell'Acqua, R. (1999). Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding. Psychological Research, 62, 154 164.
30. Jolicœur, P., Tombu, M., Oriet, C. Stevanovski, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance, Vol. XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 558 586). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
31. Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicœur, P. Brisson, B. (2008). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250 274.
32. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792 795.
33. Luck, S. J. (1998). Sources of dual-task interference: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Science, 9, 223 227.
34. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge MA : The MIT Press.
35. Luck, S. J., Fan, S Hillyard, S. A. (1993). Attention-related modulation of sensory-evoked brain activity in a visual search task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 188 195.
36. Magliero, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H. Donchin, E. (1984). On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. Psychophysiology, 21, 171 186.
37. Mondor, T. A. (1998). A transient processing deficit following selection of an auditory target. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 305 311.
38. Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2006). Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 32, 973 985.
39. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220 244.
40. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. C., Banks, B. S. Muckehoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979 992.
41. Raymond, J.E, Shapiro, K. L. Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849 860.
42. Schneider, W., Eschman, A. Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA : Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
43. Sessa, P., Luria, R., Verleger, R. Dell'Acqua, R. (2007). P3 latency shifts in the attentional blink: Further evidence for second target processing postponement. Brain Research, 1137, 131 139.
44. Shulman, H. Hsieh, V. (1995, November). The attention blink in mixed modality streams. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
45. Soto-Faraco, S. Spence, C. (2002). Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 55, 23 40.
46. Soto-Faraco, S., Spence, C., Fairbank, K., Kingstone, A., Hillstrom, A. P. Shapiro, K. L. (2002). A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 731 738.
47. Tremblay, S., Vachon, F. Jones, D. M. (2005). Attentional and perceptual sources of the auditory attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 195 208.
48. Vachon, F. Tremblay, S. (2005). Auditory attentional blink: Masking the second target is necessary, delayed masking is sufficient. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 279 286.
49. Vachon, F. Tremblay, S. (2006). Delayed masking and the auditory attentional blink: A test for retrieval competition and bottleneck models. Experimental Psychology, 53, 182 190.
50. Vogel, E. K. Luck, S. J. (2002). Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 739 743.
51. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J. Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a post-perceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1654 1674.