Comparing correlated ROC curves for continuous diagnostic tests under density ratio models

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 233-245

  Wan, Shuwen ^a   Zhang, Biao ^b  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; FINANCE; HEALTH; STATISTICAL METHODS; TESTING; TRANSPORTATION CHARGES;

BIVARIATE; DENSITY RATIO; DIAGNOSTIC MARKERS; DIAGNOSTIC TESTING; NON-PARAMETRIC; NON-PARAMETRIC STATISTICS; ROC CURVES; SIMULATION STUDIES;

FEES AND CHARGES;

EID: 49649086870     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Billingsley P. Convergence of Probability Measures (1968), Wiley, New York
2. Cai T., and Moskowitz C. Semi-parametric estimation of the binormal ROC curve for a continuous diagnostic test. Biostatistics 5 (2004) 573-586
3. Campbell G. Advances in statistical methodology for the evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests. Statist. Med. 13 (1994) 499-508
4. Delong E., Delong D., and Clarke-Pearson D. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44 (1988) 837-845
5. Greenhouse S., and Mantel N. The evaluation of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 6 (1950) 399-412
6. Hanley J., and McNeil B. A method of comparing the area under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148 (1983) 839-843
7. Hsieh F., and Turnbull B.W. Nonparametric estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Ann. Statist. 24 (1996) 25-40
8. Linnet K. Comparison of quantitative diagnostic tests: Type I error, power and sample size. Statist. Med. 6 (1987) 147-158
9. McClish D.K. Comparing the areas under more than two independent ROC curves. Med. Decis. Making 10 (1987) 149-155
10. Metz C.E., Herman B.A., and Shen J.H. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously distributed data. Statist. Med. 17 (1998) 1033-1053
11. Owen A.B. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75 (1988) 237-249
12. Owen A.B. Empirical likelihood confidence regions. Ann. Statist. 18 (1990) 90-120
13. Pepe M.S. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction (2003), Oxford University Press, New York
14. Qin J., and Lawless J.F. Empirical likelihood and estimating equations. Ann. Statist. 22 (1994) 300-325
15. Qin J., and Zhang B. A goodness of fit test for logistic regression models based on case-control data. Biometrika 84 (1997) 609-618
16. Qin J., and Zhang B. Using logistic regression procedures for estimating receiver operating characteristic curves. Biometrika 90 (2003) 585-596
17. Venkatraman E.S., and Begg C.B. A distribution free procedure for comparing receiver operating characteristic curves from a paired experiment. Biometrika 83 (1996) 835-848
18. Wan S., and Zhang B. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Statist. Med. 26 (2007) 2565-2586
19. Wieand S., Gail M.H., James B.R., and James K.L. A family of nonparametric statistics for comparing diagnostic markers with paired or unpaired data. Biometrika 76 (1989) 585-592
20. Zhang B. Quantile estimation under a two-sample semi-parametric model. Bernoulli 6 (2000) 491-511
21. Zhang B. A semiparametric hypothesis testing procedure for the ROC curve area under a density ratio model. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 50 (2006) 1855-1876
22. Zhou X.H., McClish D.K., and Obuchowski N.A. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine (2002), Wiley, New York
23. Zou K.H. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data. Acad. Radiol. 8 (2001) 225-233