Ontological modelling of content management and provision

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1155-1164

  Liu, Kecheng ^a,b   Sun, Lily ^a,b   Fu, Yan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Content management; Norms construction; Ontological modelling; Personalised information provision; Semantic analysis

Indexed keywords

MACHINE DESIGN; MECHANISMS; ONTOLOGY; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATIONS; TECHNOLOGY;

CONTENT MANAGEMENT; DISTRIBUTED SOURCES; EFFECTIVE MECHANISMS; INFORMATION CONTENTS; INFORMATION DISCOVERY; INFORMATION PROVISIONING; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; NORMS CONSTRUCTION; ONTOLOGICAL MODELLING; PERSONALISED INFORMATION PROVISION; RELEVANT INFORMATION; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 49549095335     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. P. Abrahamsson, J. Warsta, M.T. Siponen, J. Ronkainen, New directions on agile methods: a comparative analysis, in: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, 2003, pp. 244-254.
2. Allen J. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26 11 (1983) 832-843
3. Ambler S.W. The Object Primer: Agile Model Driven Development with UML 2 (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. W.N. Borst, Construction of Engineering Ontologies, Centre for Telematica and Information Technology, University of Tweenty, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1997.
5. Bruner J. Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language (1983), Norton, New York
6. Brusilovsky P., and Paylo C. Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13 1 (2003) 159-172
7. D. Cohen, M. Lindvall, P. Costa, An Introduction to Agile Methods, Advances in Computers, New York, Elsevier Science 62, 2004, pp. 1-66.
8. Conole G. Systematising learning and research information. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 7 (2002) 1-28
9. Colomb R.M., and Dampney C.N.G. An approach to ontology for institutional facts in the semantic web. Journal of Information and Software Technology 47 12 (2005) 775-783
10. Cunningham D.J. Beyond educational psychology: steps toward an educational semiotics. Educational Psychology Revue 14 2 (1992)
11. Daconta M.C., Obrst L.J., and Smith K.T. The Semantic Web: A guide to the future of XML, Web Services and Knowledge Management (2003), Wiley Publishing Inc., Indiana
12. H. Davulcu, M. Kifer, I.V. Ramakrishnan, CTR-S: a logic for specifying contracts in semantic web services, in: Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference, New York, USA, 2004, pp. 144-153.
13. DCMI, DCMI Abstract Model, Available at http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model, 2005.
14. T. Debevoise, Business Process Management with a Business Rules Approach, Business Knowledge Architects, 2005.
15. Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A., Pazos A., and Pazoa J. Building a chemical ontology using methodology and the ontology design environment. IEEE Intelligent Systems & their Applications 4 1 (1999) 37-46
16. Y. Fu, K. Liu, Design of interoperable content management using semiotic methods, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Organisational Semiotics - Interfacing Society, Technology and Organisations July 2006, Campinas, Brazil, 2006.
17. M.R. Genesereth, Knowledge Interchange Format, draft proposed American National Standard (dpANS), Technical Report NCITS/T2/98-004, Available at http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/dpans.html, 1998.
18. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (1968), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts
19. Gómez-Pérez A., Fernandez-Lopez M., and Corcho O. Ontological Engineering - with Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web (2004), Springer-Verlag, London
20. A. Gómez-Pérez, V.R. Benjamins, Ontologies and the semantic web, in: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNAI) 2473, Springer, 2002.
21. Gruber T.R. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 5-6 (1993) 907-928
22. M. Gruninger, M.S. Fox, Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies, InSkuce D. (Eds.) IJCAI95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing 6, 1995, 1-10.
23. N. Guarino, Formal ontology in information systems, in: Proceeedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS'98) IOS Press, Italy, 1998, pp. 3-15.
24. Honebein P.C., Duffy T., and Fishman B. Constructivism and the design of learning environment: context and authentic activities for learning. In: Duffy T.M., Lowyck J., and Jonassen D. (Eds). Design Environments for Constructivist Learning (1993), Springer-Verlag, New York 87-108
25. Huang H.M. Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology 33 1 (2002) 27-37
26. IEEE. Standard for Learning Object Metadata, Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC), Available on line at http://grouper.ieee.org/LTSC/wg12/ (2003).
27. IMS. IMS Content Packaging Information Model, http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging/, 2003.
28. Lenat D.B., and Guha R.V. Building Large Knowledge-based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project (1990), Addison-Wesley, Boston, Massachusetts
29. O. Lissila, D. McGuinness, The Role of Frame-based Representation on the Semantic Web, Technical Report KSL-01-02, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 2001.
30. Liu K. Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. K. Liu, L. Sun, Applying Semiotics in Constructivist Learning, Int Conf on Teaching and English Translation in the 21st Century Marco Politechnique Institute, Marco, 2002.
32. K. Liu, Y. Fu, Interoperability for digital learning resource management, in: Proceedings of The 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2005.
33. LOM. IMS Metadata Best Practice Guide for IEEE 1484.12.1-2002 Standard for Learning Object Metadata, www.imsglobal.org/metadata/mdv1p3pd/imsmd_bestv1p3pd.html, 2004.
34. Maamar Z., Narendra N.C., and Sattanathan S. Towards an ontology-based approach for specifying and securing web services. Journal of Information and Software Technology 48 7 (2006) 441-455
35. Middleton S.E., Shadbolt N.R., and Roure D.C.D. Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Transaction, Information Systems 22 1 (2004) 54-88
36. R. Mizoguchi, J. Vanwelkenhuysen, M. Ikeda, Task ontology for reuse of problem solving knowledge, in: N. Mars (Eds.) Toward Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing (KBKS'95). University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 46-57.
37. Moens M., and Steedman M. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Journal of Computational Linguistics 14 2 (1988) 15-28
38. Pedersen S., and Williams D. A comparison of assessment practices and their effects on learning and motivation in a student-centered learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 13 3 (2004) 283-307
39. Pedersen S., and Liu M. Teachers' beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development 51 2 (2003) 57-74
40. Resnick M. Turtles, Termites and Traffic Jams (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge
41. J. Savery, What is problem-based learning? Paper presented at the meeting of the Professors of Instructional Design and Technology, Indiana State University, Bloomington, 1994.
42. SCORM, SCORM Content Aggregation Model, xml.coverpages.org/SCORM-12-CAM.pdf, 2004.
43. Staab S., Schnurr H.P., Studer R., and Sure Y. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 1 (2001) 26-34
44. Stamper R.K. Information in Business and Administrative Systems (1973), John Wiley and Sons, New York
45. R.K. Stamper, K. Liu, M. Hafkamp, Y. Ades, Signs plus norms-one paradigm for organisational semiotics, in: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Semiotics, Paris, 1997.
46. Stamper R., Liu K., Hafkamp M., and Ades Y. Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organisations - a semiotic approach to information systems design. Journal of Behaviour and Information Technology 19 1 (2000) 15-17
47. Sun L., and Liu K. A method for interactive articulation of information requirements for strategic decision support. Information and Software Technology 43 4 (2001) pp. 247-326
48. Sun L., and Ousmanou K. Articulation of information requirements for personalised knowledge construction. Journal of Requirements Engineering 11 4 (2006) 279-293
49. Sure Y., Gómez-Pérez A., Daelemans W., Reinberger M., Guarino N., and Noy N.F. Why evaluate ontology technologies? because it works!. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19 4 (2004) 74-81
50. V. Tanasescu, J. Domingue, L. Cabral, OCML Ontologies to XML Schema Lowering, Workshop: First AKT Workshop on Semantic Web Services (AKT-SWS04), KMi, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, 2004.
51. Trausan-Matu S., Maraschi D., and Cerri S. Ontology-centered personalized presentation of knowledge extracted from the web. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2363 (2002), Springer 259-269
52. Uden L., Liu K., and Shank G. Linking radical constructivism and semiotics to design a constructivist learning environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 12 2 (2001) 34-51
53. Van Heijst G., Schreiber A.T.H., and Wielinga B.J. Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (1997) 183-292
54. E. von Glasersfeld, A Constructivist Approach to Teaching, in: L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education, New Jersey, 1995, pp. 3-16.
55. Wheatley G.H. Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics. Learning Science and Education 75 1 (1991) 9-21