Federalism, separatism and international trade

European Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 675-687

  Daumal, Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

F15; Federalism; Gravity model; H77; International trade; Separatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 49449110016     PISSN: 01762680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alesina A., Spolaore E., and Wacziarg R. Economic integration and political disintegration. American Economic Review 90 (2000) 1276-1296
2. Alesina A., Devleeschauwer A., Easterly W., Kurlat S., and Wacziarg R. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2003) 155-194
3. Anderson J.A., and van Wincoop E. Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review 93 (2003) 170-192
4. Auclair C. Federalism: its principles, flexibility and limitations. Conference Paper. 2nd International Conference on Decentralization in Philippines (2002), Forum of Federations
5. Baldwin R., and Taglioni D. Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12516 (2006)
6. Casella A., and Feinstein J. Public goods in trade: on the formation of markets and jurisdictions. International Economic Review 43 (2002) 437-462
7. Chen K. Failure of recentralization in China: interplays among enterprises, local governments and the center. In: Hillman A.L. (Ed). Markets and Politicians: Politicized Economic Choice (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 209-229
8. Craig S.G., and Sailors J.W. Interstate trade barriers and the constitution. The Cato Journal 6 (1987) 819-835
9. Decker J., and Lim J.J. Democracy and trade: an empirical study. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 6077 (2007), University Library of Munich
10. Duc C., Lavallee E., and Siroen J.M. The gravity of institutions. Forthcoming in Economie Internationale (2008)
11. Egger P., and Pfaffermayr M. The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics 28 (2003) 571-580
12. Egger P., and Nelson D. How bad is antidumping? Evidence from panel data. University of Nottingham Research Paper No. 2007/17 (2006)
13. Feenstra R. Border effects and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49 (2002) 491-506
14. Handbook of Federal Countries, 2005. Edited by A.L. Griffiths, coordinated by K. Nerenberg, publication for Forum of Federations.
15. Hillman A.L. Political institutions, jurisdictional boundaries, and rent creation. Keio Economic Studies 42 (2005) 25-37
16. Knox R. Canada's agreement on internal trade: it can work if we want it to. Paper Prepared for the Certified General Accountants Association of Canada (2001). http://www.cga-canada.org/en-ca/ResearchReports/ca_rep_2001-05_ait.pdf 2001 version: http://www.cga-canada.org/en-ca/ResearchReports/ca_rep_2001-05_ait.pdf
17. Kreptul A. The constitutional right of secession in political theory and history. Journal of Libertarian Studies 17 (2003) 39-100
18. Lijphart A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries (1999), Yale University Press, London
19. Martin P. When nationalism meets continentalism: the politics of free trade in Quebec. Regional and Federal Studies 5 (1995) 1-27
20. Paquin S. Paradiplomatie et Relations Internationales: Theorie des Strategies Internationales des Regions face a la Mondialisation (2004), Presses Interuniversitaires Europeennes, Bruxelles
21. Plumper T., and Troeger V. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15 (2006) 124-139
22. Rauch J. Business and social networks in international trade. Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2001) 1177-1203
23. Santos Silva J., and Tenreyro S. The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (2006) 641-658
24. Shulman S. Nationalist sources of international economic integration. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2000) 365-390
25. Vegh G. The characterization of barriers to interprovincial trade under the Canadian constitution. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 34 (1996) 359-375
26. World Bank. World Development Report 1999/2000. Washington D.C. (2000)
27. Zadorozhniy, G.E., 2002. Russia's WTO accession: Interregional barriers to agricultural trade in the Russian federation. Unpublished master's thesis. Monterey Institute of International Studies. Monterrey, California.