![]() |
Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 370-375
|
Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process
a
IQVIA
(United States)
|
Author keywords
Cardiac repolarization; Central laboratory; Clinical trials; Document scanner; Extensible markup language (XML); New drug development; QTc interval; Thorough QT study
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
DIGITALIZATION;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
MACHINE;
MALE;
MEASUREMENT;
NORMAL HUMAN;
PRINTING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QT INTERVAL;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
RR INTERVAL;
ADULT;
ARTIFACTS;
COMPUTER PERIPHERALS;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
HEART RATE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAPER;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
|
EID: 49449101318
PISSN: 00220736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.02.026 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (10)
|