Seismic fragility analysis of frame structures

International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 451-463

  Lin, J H ^a  

^a HWA HSIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Fragility analysis; Frame structure; Peak story drift

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKES; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK ASSESSMENT; STEEL STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; BUILDING BEHAVIOR; BUILDING STRUCTURES; DAMAGE STATES; EARTHQUAKE; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; FRAME STRUCTURE; FRAME STRUCTURES; PEAK STORY DRIFT; PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGNS; PROBABILITY OF FAILURE; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES; SEISMIC HAZARDS; STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL CODES;

SEISMOLOGY;

EID: 49449083305     PISSN: 02194554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219455408002740     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. EERC, Preliminary report on the seismological and engineering aspects of the October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, Report No. EERC 89-14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (1989).
2. BRI, Final report of damage survey of the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake, Building Research Institute (1996) (in Japanese).
3. MCEER, The Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake of September 21, 1999: reconnaissance report, Technical Report MCEER-00-0003, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo (2000).
4. M. Shinozuka, Statistical analysis of fragility curves, Asia-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and Its Applications, Taipei, Taiwan (1999).
5. O. Murao and F. Yamazaki, Development of fragility curves for buildings based on damage data due to the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake, Asia-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and Its Applications, Taipei, Taiwan (1999).
6. ATC, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Applied Technology Council (1996).
7. HAZUS, Earthquake loss estimation methodology, Technical Manual, National Institute of Building for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC (1997).
8. M. Shinozuka, M. Q. Feng, H. K. Kim and S. H. Kim, Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 126(12) (2000) 1287-1295.
9. H. Seya, M. E. Talbott and H. H. M. Hwang, Probabilistic seismic analysis of a steel frame structure, Prob. Eng. Mech. 8 (1993) 127-136.
10. E. Choi, R. DesRoches and B. Nielson, Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones, Eng. Struct. 26 (2004) 187-199.
11. K. David, Earthquake Design Practice for Buildings (Thomas Telford, London, 1988).
12. H. B. Seed and I. M. Idriss, Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses, Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (1970).
13. A. G. Davenport, Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 28 (1964) 187-196.
14. D. E. Cartwright and M. S. Longuet-Higgins, The statistics distribution of the maxima of a random function, Proc. Roy. Soe. Ser. A 237 (1956) 212-232.
15. P. Ruiz and J. Penzien, Probabilistic study of behavior structures during earthquakes, Report No. EERC 69-3, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (1969).
16. K. Kanai, Semi-empirical formula for seismic characterisation of the ground, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ., Tokyo (1967).
17. ICBO, Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA (1997).