Preservice Teachers Construct a View on Teaching and Learning Styles

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 68-76

  Pankratius, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4944260124     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.1997.10463365     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baird, J. R., Intellectual and methodological imperatives for individual teacher development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA. March. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 308 178)
2. Barrett, L. A., Relationship of observable teaching effectiveness behaviors to MBTI personality types. Paper presented at the International Conference for the Association of Psychological Type. Richmond, VA. July. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 357)
3. Clark, C. M., 1988. Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teaching thinking. Educational Researcher, 17 (2): 5–12.
4. Confrey, J., 1990. “ What constructivism implies for teaching ”. In Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics Edited by: Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A., and Noddings, N., 107–122. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4
5. Cooper, S. E., and Miller, J. A., 1991. MBTI learning style-teaching style discongruencies. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 51: 699–706.
6. Cronin-Jones, L., 1991. “ Interpretive research methods as a tool for educating science teachers ”. In Interpretive research in science education Edited by: Gallagher, J. J., 217–133. NARST Monograph, No. 4
7. Crow, N. A., Preservice teachers' biography: A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC. April.
8. Garden, A. M., 1991. Unresolved issues with the Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 22: 3–14.
9. Golay, K., 1982. Learning patterns and temperament styles, Fullerton, CA: Manas Systems.
10. Goodlad, J. I., 1990. Teachers for our nation's schools, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Hunt, R. J., 1987. Beginning with ourself in practice, theory, and human affairs, Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
12. Jensen, G. H., 1987. “ Learning styles ”. In Applications of the Myers-Briggs type indicator in higher education, Edited by: Provost, J. A., and Anchors, S., 181–208. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
13. Kiersey, D., 1968. A polarity theory of intelligence, California: Claremont Graduate School. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
14. Kiersey, D., and Bates, M., 1978. Please understand me: An essay on temperament styles, Del Mar, CA: Prometheus.
15. Kroeger, O., and Thuesen, J. M., 1988. Type talk, New York: Dell Publishing.
16. Lanier, J. E., and Little, J. W., October 1984. Research on teacher education, October, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas. (Occasional Paper No. 80). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 251 450)
17. Meisgeier, C., Murphy, E., and Meisgeier, C., 1989. A teachers guide to type: A new perspective on individual differences in the classroom, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
18. Merriam, S. B., 1988. Case study research in education: A qualitative approach, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Mertz, N. T., and McNeely, S. R., Pre-existing teaching constructs: How students “see” teaching prior to training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA. April. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 346 075)
20. Myers, I. B., 1989. Introduction to type: A description of the theory and applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
21. Pittenger, D. J., 1993. The utility of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63 (4): 467–488.
22. Saunders, W. L., 1992. The constructivist perspective: Implications and strategies for science. School Science and Mathematics, 92 (3): 136–141.
23. Turner, S., and Handler, M., 1991. Data collector, Santa Barbara, CA: Intellimation.
24. Tieger, P. D., and Barron-Tieger, B., 1992. Do what you are: Discover the perfect career for you through the secrets of personality type, Boston, MA: Little & Brown.
25. von Glasersfeld, E., 1988. Constructivism as a scientific method. Scientific Reasoning Research Institute Newsletter, 3 (2): 8–9.