Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: A study of software technical review meetings

Design Studies

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 625-655

  D'Astous, Patrick ^a   Détienne, Françoise ^b   Visser, Willemien ^b   Robillard, Pierre N ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b INRIA ROCQUENCOURT   (France)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Design activity; Design methodology; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ERGONOMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DESIGN ACTIVITIES; DESIGN EVALUATION MEETINGS (DEM); DISTRIBUTED DESIGNS; TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETINGS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 4944256961     PISSN: 0142694X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Johnson, P M and Tjahjono, D 'Assessing software review meetings: a controlled experimental study using CSRS', in International Conference of Software Engineering (1997).
2. Johnson P.M., Tjahjono D. Does every inspection really need a meeting? Empirical Software Engineering. 3:1998;9-35.
3. Simon H. The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial In telligence. 4:1973;181-201.
4. Visser, W A tribute to Simon, and some - too late - questions, by a cognitive ergonomist, in Proceedings of the International Conference In Honour of Herbert Simon 'The Sciences of Design The Scientific Challenge for the 21st Century' Lyon, Fr (15-16 March 2002) (edited as INRIA Research Report N° 4462 INRIA, Rocquencourt, Fr).
5. Visser W., Hoc J-M. Expert software design strategies. Hoc J-M., Green T.R.G., Samurçay R., Gilmore D.J. Psychology of Programming. 1990;235-249 Academic Press.
6. Visser W. Organisation of design activities: opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes. Interacting With Computers. 6:(3):1994;239-274.
7. Curtis B., Krasner H., Iscoe N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM. 31:1988;1268-1287.
8. Falzon P. Dialogues fonctionnels et activité collective. Le Travail Humain. 57:(4):1994;299-312.
9. Beguin P. L'activité de travail: facteur d'intégration durant les processus de conception. Bossard P., Chanchevrier C., Leclair P. Ingénierie concourante de la technique au social. 1997;Economica, Paris.
10. Martin, G, Détienne, F and Lavigne, E Negotiation in collaborative assessment of design solutions: an empirical study on a Concurrent Engineering process', in CE'2000, International Conference on Concurrent Engineering Lyon, France (17-20 juillet 2000).
11. Martin, G, Détienne, F and Lavigne, E Analysing viewpoints in design through the argumentation process, in INTERACT'2001 Tokyo, Japan (July 9-13 2001).
12. Fagan M.E. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Systems Journal. 15:(3):1976;182-211.
13. Fagan M.E. Advances in software inspections. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. SE-12:(7):1986;744-751.
14. Falzon, P, Darses, F and Béguin, P Collective design processes, in COOP'96 Second International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Juan-les-Pins, France (June 2-14 1996).
15. Herbsleb, J D, Klein, H, Olson, G M, Brunner, H, Olson, J S, Harding, J 'Object-oriented analysis and design in software project teams', in F D Tienne and R Rist (eds) Special issue on empirical studies of object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 10 No 2&3 (1995) 249-292.
16. Walz, D B, Elam, J J, Krasner, H and Curtis, B A methodology for studying software design teams: an investigation of conflict behaviors in the requirements definition phase, in G M Olson, S Sheppard and E Soloway (eds) Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second workshop (pp 83-99) Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1987).
17. Olson G.M., Olson J.S., Carter M.R., Storrosten M. Small group design meetings: an analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction. 7:1992;347-374.
18. Visser W. Collective design: A cognitive analysis of cooperation in practice. Roozenburg N.F.M. Proceedings of ICED 93 9th International Conference on Engineering Design. 1993;385-392 Heurista, Zürich.
19. Stempfle J., Badke-Schaub P. Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication. Design Studies. 23:2002;473-496.
20. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Analysing Design Activity. 1996;271-289 Chichester, New Jersey.
21. Olson G.M., Olson J.S., Storrotsen M., Carter M., Herbsleb J., Rueter H. The structure of activity during design meetings. Moran T.P., Carroll J.M. Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Uses. 1996;Erlbaum, New Jersey.
22. Buckingham Shum S., Hammond N. Argumentation-based design rationale: what use at what cost? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 40:1994;603-652.
23. Conklin E.J., Burgess K.C. A process-oriented approach to design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction. 6:1991;357-391.
24. Moran T P, Carroll, J M Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques and Uses, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1996).
25. MacLean A., Young R.M., Bellotti V., Moran T. Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction. 6:(3/4):1991;201-250.
26. Karsenty, L The Validation Dialog for a Database Conceptual Schema (Research report) INRIA Rocquencourt, France (1991).
27. Letovsky S., Pinto J., Lampert R., Soloway E. A cognitive analysis of code inspection. Olson G.M., Sheppard S., Soloway E. Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop. 1987;231-247 Norwood, New Jersey.
28. D'Astous, P La mesure des activités collaboratives retrouvées lors d'une réunion de révision technique du processus de Génie logiciel (Rapport EMP/RT-97/30) École Polytechnique, Montréal (1997).
29. Johnson, P M Reengineering Inspection: The Future of Formal Technical Review (Report ICS-TR-95-24) University of Hawaii at Manoa (1996).
30. D'Astous P Mesure et analyse des activités coopératives lors de réunions de révision technique du processus de génie logiciel (PhD Thesis) École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Canada (1999).
31. W S Humphrey (ed) Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, Chapter 10 (1989) pp 171-190.
32. Parnas D.L., Weiss D.M. Active design review: principles and practices. Journal of Systems and Software. 7:1987;259-265.
33. Yourdon E. Structured Walkthroughs. 4th edition :1989;Prentice-Hall.
34. D'Astous P., Détienne F., Robillard P.N., Visser W. Quantitative measurements of the influence of participants roles during peer review meetings. Empirical Sotware Engineering. 6:2001;143-159.
35. Paulk, M C, Curtis, B, Chrissis, M B and Weber, C V Capibility Maturity Model for Software, version 1 1 (Report SE-93-TR-24) Software Engineering Institute (1993).
36. Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Les Interactions Verbales. tome 1:1990;Amand Colin, Paris.
37. Roulet E., Auchlin A., Moeschler J., Rubattel C., Schelling M. L'articulation du discours en français contemporain. 1985;Peter Lang.
38. Sinclair A., Coulthard R.M. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. 1975;Oxford University Press, Oxford.