Young children's emotional practices while engaged in long-term science investigation

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 693-719

  Zembylas, Michalinos ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMOTIONAL PRACTICES; LONG-TERM SCIENCE INVESTIGATION; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS;

CURRICULA; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

TEACHING;

EID: 4944252981     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20023     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Alsop, S. (2001). Seeking emotional involvement in science education: Food-chains and webs. School Science Review, 83, 63-68.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Open University Press.
4. Barker, H.B. (2001). A room of one's own: Concrete and conceptual spaces. In M. Osborne & A. Barton (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practice (pp. 59-78). New York: Peter Lang.
5. Bishop, A. (1985). The social construction of meaning - a significant development for mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 5, 24-28.
6. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.
7. Butler, J. (1990/1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
8. Butler, J. (1995). For a careful reading. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, D. Cornell, & N. Fraser (Eds.), Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange (pp. 127-143). New York: Routledge.
9. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.
10. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Socioculturel dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Day, C., & Leiten, R. (2001). Teachers' and teacher educators' lives: The role of emotion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 403-415.
12. De Landa, M. (1997). A thousand years of nonlinear history. New York: Swerve Editions.
13. Denzin, N.K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Derrida, J. (1972/1991). Signature event context. In P. Kamuf (Ed.), A Derrida reader: Between the blinds (pp. 82-111). New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Flannery, M. (1991). Science and aesthetics: A partnership for science education. Science Education, 75, 577-593.
16. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
17. Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87, 574-587.
18. Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 199-224.
19. Goldstein, L. (1998). Teaching with love: A feminist approach to early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang.
20. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
21. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 835-854.
22. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811-826.
23. Harré, R. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of emotions. New York: Basil Blackwell.
24. Hart, L. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 37-45). New York: Springer.
25. Hayles, N.K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Hermann, A. (2000). Designing emotionally sound instruction: The FEASP-approach. Instructional Science, 28, 169-198.
27. Hochschild, A. (1975). The sociology of feeling and emotion: Selected possibilities. In M. Millman & R.M. Kanter (Eds.), Another voice (pp. 280-307). New York: Anchor.
28. Hochschild, A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551-575.
29. Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 307-324.
30. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the realities of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Lutz, C., & Abu-Lughod, L. (Eds.) (1990). Language and the politics of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
36. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 293-306.
39. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
40. Sarbin, T.R. (1986). Emotion and act: Roles and rhetoric. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotion (pp. 83-97). Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Silver, E.A. & Metzger, W. (1989). Aesthetic influences on expert mathematical problem solving. In D. McLeod & V. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 59-74). New York: Springer.
42. Stocker, M. (1996). Valuing emotions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Watts, M., & Alsop, S. (1997). A feeling for learning: Modeling affective learning in school science. The Curriculum Journal, 8, 351-365.
45. Watts, M., & Walsh, A. (1997). Affecting primary science: A case from the early years. Early Childhood and Care, 129, 51-61.
46. Wong, E.D., Pugh, K.J., & The Deweyan Ideas Group at Michigan State University. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. The Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 317-336.
47. Zembylas, M. (2001). A paralogical affirmation of emotion's discourse in science teaching. In M. Osborne & A. Barton (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practice (pp. 99-128). New York: Peter Lang.
48. Zembylas, M. (2002a). Constructing genealogies of teachers ' emotions in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 79-103.
49. Zembylas, M. (2002b). "Structures of feeling" in curriculum and teaching: Theorizing the emotional rules. Educational Theory, 52, 187-208.
50. Zembylas, M. (2004). Emotion metaphors and emotional labor in science teaching. Science Education, 55, 301-324.
51. Zembylas, M., & Barker, H. (2002). Beyond "methods" and prescriptions: Community conversations and individual spaces in elementary science education courses. Research in Science Education, 32, 329-351.
52. Zembylas, M. (2003a). Caring for teacher emotion: Reflections on teacher self-development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 22, 103-125.
53. Zembylas, M. (2003b). Interrogating "teacher identity": Emotion, resistance, and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53, 107-127.