Issues of representation within qualitative inquiry

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 994-1007

  Mantzoukas, Stefanos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Ontology; Qualitative research; Representation; Researcher

Indexed keywords

EPISTEMOLOGY; HEALTH SCIENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REVIEW; ARTICLE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 4944251290     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732304265959     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Abma, A. T. (2002). Emerging narrative forms of knowledge representation in the health sciences: Two texts in a postmodern context. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 5-27.
2. Agar, M. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press.
3. Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 138-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Angen, J. M. (2000). Evaluating interpretative inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3, 378-395.
5. Annells, M. (1996). Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry and postmodernism. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 379-393.
6. Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1998). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 110-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Ayer, J. A. (1971). Language, truth and logic. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
8. Badger, T. G. (2000). Action research, change and methodological rigour. Journal of Nursing Management, 8, 201-207.
9. Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. New York: Hill & Wang.
10. Barthes, R. (1987). Image music text: Selected essays. London: Fontana.
11. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
12. Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995). Fidelity as a criterion for practising and evaluating narrative inquiry. In J. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 25-35). London: Falmer.
13. Boyle, S. J. (1994). Styles of ethnography. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 159-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22, 5-12.
15. Cheek, J. (1996). Taking a view: Qualitative research as representation. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 492-505.
16. Clandinin, J. D., & Connelly, M. F. (1998). Personal experience methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 150-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Cook, T., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field setting. Chicago: Rand McNally.
19. Davies, D., & Dodd, J. (2002). Qualitative research and the question of rigor. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 279-289.
20. Denzin, N. (1997). Interpretative ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Denzin, N. K. (1998). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 313-371). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Duhem, P. (1962). The aim and structure of physical theory (R. Wiener, Trans.). New York: Atheneum.
25. Finlay, L. (2002). Outing the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 531-545.
26. Fox, N. J. (1992). Hie social meaning of surgery. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
27. Gadamer, H. G. (1994). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Seabury.
28. Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
29. Glaser, B. (1992). Emergence vs forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociological Press.
30. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
31. Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. London: Harvard University Press.
32. Grayling, C. A. (2001). Wittgenstein: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 195-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Gutting, G. (2001). French philosophy in the twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hall, A. W., & Callery, P. (2001). Enhancing the rigor of grounded theory: Incorporating reflexivity and rationality. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 257-272.
38. Hammond, M., Howarth, J., & Keat, R. (1991). Understanding phenomenology. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
39. Henwood, L. K., & Pidgeon, F. N. (1993). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice (pp. 78-92). London: Open University and Sage.
40. Hertz, R. (1997). Reflexivity and voice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Hesse, E. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42. Huckin, T. (2002). Textual silence and the discourse of homelessness. Discourse & Society, 13(3), 347-372.
43. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. B. Gibson, Trans.). London: Allen and Unwin.
44. Jasper, M. (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 309-334.
45. Johnson, L. J. (1997). Generalizability in qualitative research: Excavating the discourse. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 191-226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Johnson, M. (1995). Coping with data in an ethnographic study Nurse Researcher, 3(2), 22-33.
47. Johnson, M., Long, T., & White, A. (2001). Arguments for British pluralism in qualitative health research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(2), 243-249.
48. Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 976-986.
49. Krieger, S. (1991). Social science and self: Personal essays as an art form. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
50. Kuhn, S. T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Lane, P., McKenna, H., Ryan, A., & Fleming, P. (2001). Focus group methodology. Nurse Researcher, 8(3), 45-59.
52. Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 87-99.
53. Lecompte, M. (2002). The transformation of ethnographic practice: Past and current challenges. Qualitative Research, 2, 283-299.
54. Lee, S. D. (2001). The morning tea break ritual: A case study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 7, 69-73.
55. Le Roy, E. (1901). Un positivisme nouveau. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 9, 142-176.
56. Lewis, W. M., & Kelemen, L. M. (2002). Multiparadigm inquiry: Exploring organisational pluralism and paradox. Human Relations, 55(2), 251-275.
57. Lyotard, J. F. (1992). The postmodern explained to children. London: Turnaround.
58. Morse, J. M. (2002). A comment on comments. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 3-4.
59. Morse, J. M., & Singleton, J. (2001). Exploring the technical aspects of "fit" in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 841-847.
60. Muecke, A. M. (1994). On the evaluation of ethnographies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 187-209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306-313.
62. Nagel, T. (1997). The last word. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. Patton, Q. M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Pihlström, S. (1998, August). Narrativity, modernity, and tragedy: How pragmatism educates humanity. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Boston.
65. Polit, F. D., & Hungler, P. B. (1999). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
66. Popper, K. (1945). Open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
67. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
68. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
69. Quetelet, A. (1968). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. New York: Burt Franklin.
70. Ray, M. N. (1994). The richness of phenomenology: Philosophic, theoretic and methodologic concerns. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 117-133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
72. Rolfe, G. (2000). Research, truth & authority: Postmodern perspective on nursing. London: Macmillan.
73. Rolfe, G. (2001). Postmodernism for healthcare workers in 13 easy steps. Nurse Education Today, 21, 38-47.
74. Rolfe, G. (2002a). Faking a difference: Evidence-based nursing and the illusion of diversity. Nurse Education Today, 22, 3-12.
75. Rolfe, G. (2002b). Reflexive research and the therapeutic use of self. In D. Freshwater (Ed.), Therapeutic nursing: Improving patient care through self awareness and reflection (pp. 179-194). London: Sage.
76. Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
77. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 27.
78. Sandelowski, M. (1995). On aesthetics of qualitative research. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(3), 205-209.
79. Sarantakos, S. (1998). Social research (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
80. Smith, M. L. (1998). Biographical method. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 184-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81. Sokal, A. (1996). A physicist experiment with cultural studies. Lingua Franca, 6(4), 62-64.
82. Stake, E. R. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
83. Stewart, D., & Mickunas, A. (1974). Exploring phenomenology: A guide to the field and its literature. Chicago: American Library Association.
84. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Palmer.
85. Thorne, S. (1997). The art (and science) of critiquing qualitative research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 117-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
87. Wolcott, H. F. (2002). Writing up qualitative research ... better. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 91-103.