On the use and value of new media and how medical students assess their effectiveness in learning anatomy

Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist

Volumn 280, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 20-29

  Jastrow, Holger ^a   Hollinderbaumer, Anke ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anatomical instruction; Anatomy; E learning; Internet; Medical education

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; BOOK; COMPACT DISK; ELECTRONICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MICROCOMPUTER; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION;

ADULT; ANATOMY; COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA; COMPUTERS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MICROCOMPUTERS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 4944248861     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20027     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ackerman JD, Keller K, Fuchs H. 2001. Real-time anatomical 3D image extraction for laparoscopic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 81:18-22.
2. Al-Shahi R, Sandercock PAG. 2003. Internet resources for neurologists. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 74:699-703.
3. Anderson MB. 2003. Really good stuff new ideas in medical education: a peer-reviewed collection of reports on innovative approaches to medical education. Med Edu 37:473-489.
4. Association of American Medical Colleges. 1998. Medical school objectives project: II, contemporary issues in medicine: medical informatics and population medicine. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
5. Brinkley JF, Bradley SW, Sundsten JW, Rosse C. 1997. The digital anatomist information system and its use in the generation and delivery of Web-based anatomy atlases. Comp Biomed Res 30:472-503. (htrp://www.aamc.org/ meded/msop2.pdf)
6. Casebeer L, Bennett N, Kristofco R, et al. 2002. Physician Internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns. J Contin Educ Health Prof 22:33-42.
7. Darmoni SJ, Amsallem E, Haugh M, et al. 2003. Level of evidence as a future gold standard for the content quality of health resources on the Internet. Methods Inf Med 42:220-225.
8. Dornan T, Maredia N, Hosie L, et al. 2003. A Web-based presentation of an undergraduate clinical skills curriculum. Med Edu 37:500-508.
9. Elizondo-Omaña RE, Morales-Gómez JA, Guzmán López S, et al. 2004. Traditional teaching supported by computer-assisted learning for macroscopic anatomy. Anat Rec 278B:18-22.
10. Evesque F, Gerlach S, Hersch RD. 2002. Building 3D anatomical scenes on the Web. J Vis Comp Ani 13:43-52.
11. Feldman CA. 1992. Dental student experience and perceptions of computer technology. J Dent Educ 56:200-205.
12. Filler TJ, Jerosch J, Peuker ET. 2000. Live interdisciplinary teaching via the Internet. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 61:157-162.
13. Frasca D, Malezieux R, Mertens P, et al. 2000. Review and evaluation of anatomy sites on the Internet (updated 1999). Surg Radiol Anat 22:107-110.
14. Frey P, Hofer D. 1999. The use of print and non-print learning resources among medical students: a survey (http://www.aum.iawf.unibe.ch/did/for/AMEE1. pdf).
15. Garner BA, Pandy MG. 2001. Musculoskeletal model of the upper limb based on the visible human male dataset. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 4:93-126.
16. Gerlach S, Hersch RD. 2002. A real-time navigator for the visible human. IEEE Internet Computing 6:27-33.
17. Gibson KE, Silverberg M. 2000. A two-year experience teaching computer literacy to first-year medical students using skill-based cohorts. Bull Med Libr Assoc 88: 157-164.
18. Goes VP, Machado LS, Cabral MC, et al. 2001. Interactive stereoscopic full-color direct volume visualization for virtual reality applications in medicine. Stud Health Technol Inform 81:161-167.
19. Grigg PA, Stephens CD. 1999. A survey of the IT skills and attitudes of final year dental students at Bristol University in 1996 and 1997. Eur J Dent Educ 3:64-73.
20. Guttmann GD. 2000. Animating functional anatomy for the Web. Anat Rec (New Anat) 261B:57-63.
21. Höhne KH. 2001. Vom Anatomie Atlas zum virtuellen Körper. Spectr Wiss 9:46-57.
22. Höhne KH, Pflesser B, Pommert A, et al. 2001. A realistic model of human structure from the visible human data. Methods Inf Med 40:83-89.
23. Hollander S. 1999. Assessing and enhancing medical students' computer skills: a two-year experience. Bull Med Libr Assoc 87:67-73.
24. Jastrow H, Vollrath L. 2003. Teaching and learning gross anatomy using modern electronic media based on the visible human project. Clin Anat 16:44-54.
25. Kim S, Brinkley JF, Rosse C. 1999. Design features of on-line anatomy information resources: a comparison with the digital anatomist (http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D005478.PDF).
26. Lang WP. 1995. Trends in students' knowledge, opinions, and experience regarding dental informatics and computer applications. JAMA 2:374-382.
27. Marks SC. 2000. The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: the implications for anatomy and dissection. Clin Anat 13: 448-452.
28. Mattheos N, Nattestad A, Schittek M, Attstrom R. 2002. Computer literacy and attitudes among students in 16 European dental schools: current aspects, regional differences and future trends. Eur J Dent Educ 6:30-35.
29. Nurjahan MI, Lim TA, Yeong SW, et al. 2002. Utilization of information technology in medical education: a questionnaire survey of students in a Malaysian institution. Med J Malaysia 57:58-66.
30. Obst O. 1998. Use of Internet resources by German medical professionals. Bull Med Lib Assoc 86:528-533.
31. Odusanya OO, Bamgbala, OA. 2002. Computing and information technology skills of final year medical and dental students at the college of medicine of the University of Lagos. Niger Postgrad Med J 9: 189-193.
32. Pleuse S, Blind S, Oestmann J. 2003. Medizinische Lernszenarien der Zukunft. Humboldt Spektr 1:12-16.
33. Quinn F, Keogh P, McDonald A, Hussey D. 2003. A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of conventional training and virtual reality simulation in the skills acquisition of junior dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 7:13-19.
34. Ray NJ, Hannigan A. 1999. A survey of the computer literacy of undergraduate dental students at a university dental school in Ireland during the academic year 1997-98. Eur J Dent Educ 3:56-63.
35. Rosser JC, Gabriel N, Herman B, Murayama M. 2001. Telementoring and teleproctoring. World J Surg 25:1438-1448.
36. Schulz S, Klar R, Auhuber T, et al. 1999. Quality criteria for electronic publications in medicine (http://www.imbi.unifreiburg.de/medinf/gmdsqc/e.htm).
37. Seago BL, Schlesinger JB, Hampton CL. 2002. Using a decade of data on medical student computer literacy for strategic planning. J Med Libr Assoc 90:202-209.
38. Seitz J, Schubert S, Volk M, et al. 2003. Evaluation of radiological teaching programs in the Internet. Radiologe 43:66-76.
39. Thomson S, Phillips N. 2003. Internet resources for neurosurgeons and neuropathologists. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 74: 154-157.
40. Virtanen JI, Nieminen P. 2002. Information and communication technology among undergraduate dental students in Finland. Eur J Dent Educ 6:147-152.
41. Voiglio EJ, Frasca D, Malezieux R, et al. 1999. Prospecting and evaluation of the anatomy sites on the Internet. Surg Radiol Anat 21:65-68.
42. World Federation of Medical Education 2001. Guidelines for using information and communication technology in medical education (http://www.sund.ku.dk/WFME/Activities/ WFME%20Guidelines%20Info%20and%20Communic%20Tech.htm).