Line ratio method for measurement of magnetic field vector using Li-multiplet (22S-22P) emission

Review of Scientific Instruments

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 2590-2602

  Korotkov, A A ^a   Morgan, P D ^a   Vince, J ^a   Schweinzer, J ^b   Pamela, J ^b   Solano, E R ^b  

^a CULHAM SCIENCE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PLASMAPHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT DENSITY; DENSITY (OPTICAL); ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE POLARIZATION; LITHIUM; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETRONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; STATISTICAL METHODS; VECTORS; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT; WAVE INTERFERENCE;

EDGE LOCALIZED MODES (ELM); INCLINATION ANGLES; MAGNETIC FIELD VECTORS; ZEEMAN EFFECT;

PLASMAS;

EID: 4944248405     PISSN: 00346748     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1763250     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. K. McCormick, in Basic and Advanced Diagnostic Techniques for Fusion Plasmas, edited by P. E. Stott et al. (Commission of the European Communities, and Citta di Castella, Monotypia Franchi, 1987), Vol. II, pp. 635-656.
2. F. M. Levinton, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63(10), 5157 (1992).
3. B. C. Stratton, D. Long, R. Palladino, and N. C. Hawkes, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70(1), 898 (1999).
4. A. A. Korotkov, K. McCormick, P. D. Morgan, J. Schweinzer, and J. Vince, in Advanced Diagnostics for Magnetic and Inertial Fusion edited by P.E. Stott et al. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 2002), pp. 209-212.
5. I. I. Sobelmann, Atomic Spectra and Radiative Transitions (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).
6. 2} or at any φif k=1. The relationship between the measured parameter ξ(θ) and cos θ in the general case is presented in Appendix B.
7. J. Schweinzer, R. Brandenburg, I. Bray, R. Hoekstra, F. Aumayr, R. K. Janev, and H. P. Winter, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 72, 239 (1999).
8. Notice that collisional mixing of the 2pm-states is not effective due to small rate coefficients for Δℓ=0-transitions in the far Born range.
9. For the general case we omit the details of the optics assuming k=1 and take also into account that C≈1.
10. R.
11. K. McCormick, S. Fiedler, G. Kocsis, J. Schweinzer, and S. Zoletnik, Fusion Eng. Des. 34-35, 125 (1997).
12. No deviation of the peak widths from the apparatus function was found. Therefore we concluded that the radiating atoms had the energies below the thermal energy of the plasma ions and called them "cold."
13. D. P. O'Brien, L. L. Lao, E. R. Solano, M. Garriba, T. S. Taylor, J. G. Cordey, and J. J. Ellis, Nucl. Fusion 32, 1351 (1992).
14. D. Clarke and J. F. Grainger, Polarized Light and Optical Measurement (Pergamon, New York, 1971), pp. 64-69.
15. D. M. Thomas, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66(1), 806 (1995).
16. J. R. Ferron, L. R. Baylor, M. S. Chance, M. S. Chu, G. L. Jackson, L. L. Lao, M. Murakami, T. H. Osborne, P. B. Snyder, E. J. Strait, A. D. Turnbull, and M. R. Wade, Proceedings of 27th EPS on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Budapest, 2000, Vol. 24B (European Physical Society, 2001), p. 548 on CD-ROM (P2.023).
17. V. Parail, G. Bateman, M. Becoulet, G. Corrigan, D. Heading, J. Hogan, W. Houlberg, G. T. A. Huysmans, J. Kinsey, A. Korotkov, A. Kritz, A. Loarte, J. Lonnroth, D. McDonald, P. Monier-Garbet, T. Onjun, G. Saibene, R. Sartori, S. E. Sharapov, and H. R. Wilson, 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon, 2002, IAEA-CN-94 (TH/P3-08) Vienna IAEA, on CD-ROM.
18. J. W. Kwan, F. M. Bieniosek, E. Henestroza, L. Prost, and P. Seidl, Laser Part. Beams 20, 441 (2002).
19. T) one should find a maximum of ξ that corresponds to tan β=cos φ/η.
20. Parameter C is different in gas and plasma. Moreover, C depends on the position of the source in the plasma (i.e., on angle β) due to influence of the electrons on the polarization (see Chapter 2.3).
21. Everywhere we assume that the beam is in the optical plane of the periscope.
22. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Non-Relativtstic Theory (Pergamon, New York, 1977), pp. 213-219.