The National Research Council Report on the prevention of reading difficulties in young children and the process of dubitation

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 5-22

  Kameenui, Edward J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Beginning reading; Educational research; National Academy of Sciences; Reading research; Research evidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 4944248197     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022183714634     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Adams, M. (1991). Beginning to read: A critique by literacy professionals. The Reading Teacher, 44(6), 371-372.
3. Bower, B. (1992). Reading the code, reading the whole: Researchers wrangle over the nature and teaching of reading. Science News, 141(9), 138-141.
4. Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
5. Carnine, D. (1993). Facts over fads. Education Week, December 8, p. 40.
6. Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513-521.
7. Chall, J. (1992, May). Whole language and direct instruction models: Implications for teaching reading in the schools. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Orlando, FL.
8. Chaney, J. H. (1991). Beginning to read: A critique by literacy professionals. The Reading Teacher, 44(6), 374-375.
9. Dixon, R., Carnine, D., Lee, D., Wallin, J., Chard, D., Simmons, D., & Kameenui, E. (1998). Report to the California State Board of Education: Review of high quality experimental mathematics research. Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
10. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
11. Goodman, K. (May, 1992). Whole language and direct instruction models: Implications for teaching reading in the schools. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Orlando, FL.
12. Horgan, J. (1996). The end of science: Facing the limits of knowledge in the twilight of the scientific age. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
13. Kameenui, E. J. (1991). Toward a scientific pedagogy: A sameness in the message. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(6), 364-372.
14. Kameenui, E. J. (1993). Diverse learners and the tyranny of time: Don't fix blame; fix the leaky roof. The Reading Teacher, 46(5), 376-383.
15. Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Response to Deegan: Keep the curtain inside the tub. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 700-703.
16. Kameenui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (Eds.). (1998). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Columbus, OH: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
17. Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
18. Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1999). The architecture of instruction: Towards successful inclusion of students with disabilities. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
19. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Liberman, A., & Liberman, I. (1990). Whole language vs. code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 52-76.
21. Mather, N. (1992). Whole language reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: Caught in the cross fire. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 87-95.
22. Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D. (1977). Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
23. National Academy of Sciences (1997). Home page main menu [on-line]. Available: http://www4.nas.edu/nas/nashome.nsf/.
24. National Research Council: Getting to Know the Committee Process, (1996). NAS/NRC Study Procedures, (1996).
25. Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1996). What it means to learn to read. In M. F. Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. M. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child's right to read. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: HarperCollins.
27. Sagan, C. (1995). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. NY: Random House.
28. Simmons, D. C., Kameenui, E. J., Carnine, D. W., Lee, D., & Wallin, J. (1998). Evaluation of research on educational approaches (EREA). Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
29. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1993). Instructional design. New York, NY: Merrill-Macmillan Publishing Co.
30. Snow, C. & Burns, S. (1996). Committee on prevention of reading difficulties in young children: Draft-Issues and tasks. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
31. Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D. C.: The National Research Council.
32. Stanovich, K. (December, 1997). Twenty-five years of research on the reading process: The grand synthesis and what it means for our field. Oscar S. Causey Research Award Address presented at the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, Arizona.
33. Statement of Task, NAS Proposal No. 95-CBASSE-I08 Revised.
34. Wagner, J. (1993). Ignorance in educational research or, how can you not know that? Educational Researcher, 22(5), 15-23.