Differences in response to topical irritants in haired and hairless guinea pigs

Journal of Toxicology - Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 159-171

  Andersen, Flemming ^a   Hedegaard, K ^b   Fullerton, A ^b  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b LEO PHARMA A S   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Guinea pig; In vivo; Noninvasive methods; Skin care formulations; Tolerability

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; DERMATOLOGICAL AGENT; DRUG VEHICLE; IRRITANT AGENT;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COLORIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG FORMULATION; ERYTHEMA; GUINEA PIG; HAIR; HAIR GROWTH; HAIR REGROWTH; HAIRLESS SKIN; HAIRY SKIN; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TEST; SKIN WATER LOSS; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TOLERABILITY TEST; TOPICAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

ANIMALIA; CAVIA; CAVIA PORCELLUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 4944239806     PISSN: 07313829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/CUS-200035361     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hisoire G, Bucks D. An unexpected finding in percutaneous absorption between haired and hairless guinea pig skin. J Pharm Sci 1997; 86(3):398-400.
2. Woodward DF, Nieves AL, Williams LS, Spada CS, Hawley SB, Duenes JL. A new hairless strain of guinea pig: characterization of the cutaneous morphology and pharmacology. In: Maibach HI, Lowe NJ, eds. Models in Dermatology. Vol. 4. Karger: Basel, 1989:71-78.
3. Sueki H, Gammal C, Kudoh K, Kligman AM. Hairless guinea pig skin: anatomical basis for studies of cutaneous biology. Eur J Dermatol 2000; 10(5):357-364.
4. Chester AE, Terrel TG, Nave E, Dorr AE, Depass LR. Dermal sensitization study in hairless guinea pigs with dinitrochlorobenzene and ethyl aminobenzoate. J Toxicol Cut & Ocular Toxicol 1988; 7(4):273-281.
5. Buehler E, Kreuzmann JJ. Comparable sensitivity of hairless and Hartley strain guinea pigs to a primary irritant and a sensitizer. J Toxicol Cut & Ocular Toxicol 1990; 9(3):163-168.
6. Miyauchi H, Horio T. A new animal model for contact dermatitis: the hairless guinea pig. J Dermatol 1992; 19(3):140-145.
7. Cochran W, Cox G. Incomplete block designs. Experimental Design. New York: Wiley Publications in Statistics Wiley, 1957:376-395.
8. Frosch P, Kligman A. The soap chamber test. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979; 1:35-41.
9. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 22(3):164-178.
10. Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A, Wilhelm KP, Takiwaki H, Serup J. Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35(1):1-10.
11. Brown H, Prescott R. Repeated measures data. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. Statistics in Practice. Chichester: Wiley, 1999:199-226.
12. Matthews JNS, Altman Douglas G, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ 1990; 300(6719):230-235.
13. Brown H, Prescott R. Normal mixed models. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. Statistics in Practice. Chichester: Wiley, 1999:36-40.
14. Scheuplein RJ. Permeability of the skin: a review of major concepts. Curr Probl Dermatol 1978; 7:172-186.
15. Kao J, Hall J, Helman G. In vitro percutaneous absorption in mouse skin: influence of skin appendages. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1988; 94(1):93-103.
16. Illel B, Schaefer H, Wepierre J, Doucet O. Follicles play an important role in percutaneous absorption. J Pharm Sci 1991; 80(5):424-427.
17. Chu I, Dick D, Bronaugh R, Tryphonas L. Skin reservoir formation and bioavailability of dermally administered chemicals in hairless guinea pigs. Food Chem Toxicol 1996; 34(3):267-276.
18. Haigh JM, Smith EJ. The selection and use of natural and synthetic membranes for in vitro diffusion experiments. Eur J Pharm Sci 1994; 2:311-330.