|
Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1046-1055
|
The antenatal care debate.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
FEMALE;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HUMAN;
MIDDLE EAST;
NURSE MIDWIFE;
OBSTETRICS;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
PRENATAL CARE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
REVIEW;
STANDARD;
TIME;
CLINICAL PROTOCOLS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
FEMALE;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE EAST;
NURSE MIDWIVES;
OBSTETRICS;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY OUTCOME;
PRENATAL CARE;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 4944228304
PISSN: 10203397
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (43)
|