Optical formula to predict outcomes after implantation of accommodating intraocular lenses

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 2084-2087

  Missotten, Tom ^a,b,c   Verhamme, Thibault ^a   Blanckaert, Johan ^a,b   Missotten, Guy ^a,c  

^a University of Leuven   (Netherlands)

^b J Ypermanhospital ^*  (Belgium)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER ANGLE; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER DEPTH; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANTATION; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MATHEMATICS; OPTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 4944226086     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cumming J.S., Slade S.G., Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens; results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial; the AT-45 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 108:2001;2005-2009. discussion by TP Werblin, 2010
2. Küchle M., Langenbucher A., Gusek-Schneider G.C., et al. Erste Ergebnisse der Implantation einer neuen, potenziell akkommodierbaren Hinterkammerlinse - eine prospektive Sicherheitsstudie. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 218:2001;603-608
3. Küchle M., Nguyen N.X., Langenbucher A., et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 18:2002;208-216
4. Altan-Yaycioglu R., Gözüm N., Gücükoglu A. Pseudo-accommodation with intraocular lenses implanted in the bag. J Refract Surg. 18:2002;271-275
5. Gonzalez F., Capeans C., Santos L., et al. Anteroposterior shift in rigid and soft implants supported by the intraocular capsular bag. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 23:1992;230-239
6. Findl O., Kiss B., Petternel V., et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 29:2003;669-676
7. Hardman Lea S.J., Rubinstein M.P., Snead M.P., Haworth S.M. Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 74:1990;22-25
8. Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F., Hayashi F. Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 135:2003;432-436
9. Langenbucher A., Huber S., Nguyen N.X., et al. Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 29:2003;677-685
10. Legeais J.-M., Werner L., Werner L., et al. Pseudoaccommodation. BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;262-267
11. Lesiewska-Junk H., Kaluzny J. Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eyes of young patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 26:2000;562-565
12. Payer H. Ringwulstlinse mit Zoomwirkung zur Verstärkung einer Pseudoakkommodation und deren Erklärung aus erweiterter Akkommodationstheorie. Spektr Augenheilkd. 11:1997;81-89
13. Bennett A.G., Rabbetts R.B. Clinical Visual Optics. 2nd ed:1989;Butterworths, London
14. Keating M.P. Geometric, Physical, and Visual Optics. 1988;Butterworths, London