The Spanish norms of the NEO five-factor inventory: New data and analyses for its improvement;Hacia una mejora de los datos normativos en la adaptación Espanola del NEO-FFI

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 639-648

  Manga, Dionisio ^a   Ramos, Francisco ^b   Morán, Consuelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Five factor model; Item analysis; NEO FFI; Norms; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 49349113234     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Briggs, S.R., & Cheek, J.M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106-148.
2. Butcher, J.N., & Rouse, S.V. (1996). Personality: Individual differences and clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 87-111.
3. Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
4. Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
5. Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1999). NEO-PI-R, Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado. NEOFFI, Inventario NEO reducido de Cinco Factores [Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEOPI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)]. Manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
6. Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: emergence of the Five Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
7. Egan, V., Deary, I., & Austin, E. (2000). The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 907-920.
8. Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
9. Holden, R.R., & Fekken, G.C. (1994). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Canadian context: psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441-444.
10. John, O.P. (1990). The "Big Five"factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
11. McCrae, R.R. (1989). Why I advocate the five.factor model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI and other instruments. In D.M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237-245). New York: Springer.
12. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T.Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
13. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T.Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
14. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T.Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596.
15. McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T.Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W.D., Mills, C.J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456-1468.
16. McCrae, R.R., & John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the Five Factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
17. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L.R. (1998). What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495-524.
18. Schmitz, N., Hartkamp, N., Baldini, C., Roolnik, J., & Tress, W. (2001). Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO-FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 713-722.