Quality of Life Evaluation for Patients Receiving Vascularized Versus Nonvascularized Bone Graft Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1856-1863

  Vu, David D ^a   Schmidt, Brian L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FIBULA GRAFT; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILIAC CREST; JAW MALFORMATION; MALE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MANDIBLE RESECTION; MASTICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWALLOWING; TASTE ACUITY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FIBULA; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; ILIUM; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 49349107994     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Young C.W., Pogrel M.A., and Schmidt B.L. Quality of life in patients undergoing segmental mandibular resection and staged reconstruction with nonvascularized bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65 (2007) 706
2. Vayvada H., Mola F., Menderes A., et al. Surgical management of ameloblastoma in the mandible: Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction with free fibula or deep circumflex iliac artery flap (evaluation of the long-term esthetic and functional results). J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 (2006) 1532
3. Pogrel M.A., Podlesh S., Anthony J.P., et al. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 (1997) 1200
4. Anthony J.P., Foster R.D., and Pogrel M.A. The free fibula bone graft for salvaging failed mandibular reconstructions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 (1997) 1417
5. Hidalgo D.A., and Pusic A.L. Free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A 10-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 110 (2002) 438
6. Schrag C., Chang Y.M., Tsai C.Y., et al. Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection. J Surg Oncol 94 (2006) 538
7. Pogrel M.A., and Schmidt B.L. Reconstruction of the mandibular ramus/condyle unit following resection of benign and aggressive lesions of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65 (2007) 801
8. Holzle F., Watola A., Kesting M.R., et al. Atrophy of free fibular grafts after mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 119 (2007) 151
9. Maciejewski A., and Szymczyk C. Fibula free flap for mandible reconstruction: Analysis of 30 consecutive cases and quality of life evaluation. J Reconstr Microsurg 23 (2007) 1
10. Disa J.J., Winters R.M., and Hidalgo D.A. Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction. Am J Surg 174 (1997) 503
11. Schliephake H., Schmelzeisen R., Husstedt H., et al. Comparison of the late results of mandibular reconstruction using nonvascularized or vascularized grafts and dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 (1999) 944
12. Kramer F.J., Dempf R., and Bremer B. Efficacy of dental implants placed into fibula-free flaps for orofacial reconstruction. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 (2005) 80
13. Eski M., Turegun M., Deveci M., et al. Vertical distraction osteogenesis of fibular bone flap in reconstructed mandible. Ann Plast Surg 57 (2006) 631
14. Rogers S.N., Lakshmiah S.R., Narayan B., et al. A comparison of the long-term morbidity following deep circumflex iliac and fibula free flaps for reconstruction following head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 112 (2003) 1517
15. Weymuller Jr. E.A., Alsarraf R., Yueh B., et al. Analysis of the performance characteristics of the University of Washington Quality of Life instrument and its modification (UW-QOL-R). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127 (2001) 489
16. Rogers S.N., Lowe D., Brown J.S., et al. A comparison between the University of Washington Head and Neck Disease-Specific measure and the Medical Short Form 36, EORTC QOQ-C33 and EORTC Head and Neck 35. Oral Oncol 34 (1998) 361
17. Chandu A., Sun K.C., DeSilva R.N., et al. The assessment of quality of life in patients who have undergone surgery for oral cancer: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 (2005) 1606
18. Rogers S.N., Gwanne S., Lowe D., et al. The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale. Head Neck 24 (2002) 521
19. Cella D.F. Quality of life: Concepts and definition. J Pain Symptom Manage 9 (1994) 186
20. Rogers S.N., Lowe D., Fisher S.E., et al. Health-related quality of life and clinical function after primary surgery for oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40 (2002) 11
21. de Graeff A., de Leeuw J.R., Ros W.J., et al. Long-term quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 110 (2000) 98
22. Rogers S.N., Lowe D., Brown J.S., et al. The University of Washington head and neck cancer measure as a predictor of outcome following primary surgery for oral cancer. Head Neck 21 (1999) 394
23. Rogers S.N., Hannah L., Lowe D., et al. Quality of life 5-10 years after primary surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27 (1999) 187
24. Mehanna H.M., and Morton R.P. Deterioration in quality-of-life of late (10-year) survivors of head and neck cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 31 (2006) 204