Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-65

  Chen, Baoguo ^a   Ning, Aihua ^a   Bi, Hongyan ^b   Dunlap, Susan ^c  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese; Object relative clause; Subject relative clause; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHINA; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CHINA; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 49349094516     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chen E., Gibson E., and Wolf F. Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 144-169
2. Daneman M., and Carpenter P.A. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 19 (1980) 450-466
3. Fedorenko E., Gibson E., and Rohde D. The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 541-553
4. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 (1998) 1-76
5. Gibson E. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Miyashita Y., Marantz A., and O'Neil W. (Eds). Image, language, brain (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 95-126
6. Gibson E., and Pearlmutter N. Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in cognitive science 2 (1998) 262-268
7. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Johnson M. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27 (2001) 1411-1423
8. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., Johnson M., and Lee Y. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32 (2006) 1304-1321
9. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Levine W.H. Memory load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 425-430
10. Hsiao F., and Gibson E. Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90 (2003) 3-27
11. Just M.A., and Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 122-149
12. King J., and Just M.A. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (1991) 580-602
13. Law S.P. Structural prominence hypothesis and Chinese aphasic sentence comprehension. Brain and Language 74 2 (2000) 260-268
14. Law S.P., and Leung M.T. Sentence processing deficits in two Cantonese aphasic patients. Brain and Language 72 3 (2000) 310-342
15. Lin, C. C., & Bever, T. G. (2006). Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. In Donald Baumer, David Montero, Michael Scanlon (Eds). Proceedings of the 25th west coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 254-260). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
16. MacWhinney B. Basic syntactic processes. In: Kuczaj S. (Ed). Language acquisition volume 1 syntax and semantics (1982), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
17. Mak W.M., Vonk W., and Schriefers H. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 50-68
18. Mak W.M., Vonk W., and Schriefers H. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 466-490
19. Martin R.C. Short-term memory and sentence processing: Evidence from neuropsychology. Memory and Cognition 21 (1993) 176-183
20. Martin R.C., and Freedman M.L. Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory 9 (2001) 26-280
21. Martin R.C., and Romani C. Verbal working memory and sentence processing: A multiple components view. Neuropsychology 8 (1994) 506-523
22. Martin R.C., Shelton J.R., and Yaffee L.S. Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 83-111
23. Mecklinger A., Schriefers H., Steinhauer K., and Friederici A.D. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition 23 (1995) 477-494
24. Schriefers H., Friederici A.D., and Kühn K. The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 499-520
25. Su Y.C., Lee S.E., and Chung Y.M. Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: A test of the trace-deletion hypothesis and the double dependency hypothesis. Brain and Language 101 (2007) 1-18
26. Tanenhaus M.K., and Trueswell J.C. Sentence comprehension. In: Miller J.L., and Eimas P.D. (Eds). Speech language, and communication (1995), Academic Press, San Diego 217-262
27. Traxler M.J., Morris R.K., and Seely R.E. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 69-90
28. Traxler M.J., Williams R.S., Blozis S.A., and Morris R.K. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53 (2005) 204-224
29. Yamashita H., Stowe L., and Nakayama M. Processing of Japanese relative clause constructions. In: Clancy P.M. (Ed). Japanese/Korean linguistics: II (1993), Center for Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 248-263