Combining aggregate and individual methods of flake debris analysis: Aggregate trend analysis

North American Archaeologist

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-90

  Bradbury, Andrew P ^a   Carr, Philip J ^b  

^a Cultural Resource Analysts Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49349086856     PISSN: 01976931     EISSN: 15413543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/XGN6-21L7-PJ07-BMQU     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AHLER, STANLEY A. 1989a Mass Analysis of Flaking Debris: Studying the Forest Rather Than the Trees, in Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, D. O. Henry and G. H. Odell (eds.), American Anthropological Association, Archaeological Papers 1, pp. 85-118.
2. 1989b Experimental Knapping with KRF and Midcontinent Cherts: Overview and Application, in Experiments in Lithic Technology, D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin (eds.), BAR International Series 528, Great Britain, pp. 119-234.
3. AHLER, STANLEY A. and ROBERT C. CHRISTENSEN 1983 A Pilot Study of Knife River Flint Procurement and Reduction at Site 32DU508, a Quarry and Workshop Location in Dunn County, North Dakota, Department of Anthropology and Archeology, University of North Dakota, submitted to the State Historical Society of North Dakota, Bismark.
4. AMICK, DANIEL and RAYMOND P. MAULDIN 1997 Effects of Raw Material on Flake Breakage Patterns, Lithic Technology, 22:1, pp. 18-32.
5. ANDREFSKY, WILLIAM 2001a Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
6. BECK, CHARLOTTE and GEORGE T. JONES 1989 Bias and Archaeological Classification, American Antiquity, 54, pp. 244-262.
7. BRADBURY, ANDREW P. 1998 Multiple Methods for the Examination of Lithic Artifacts from an Early Archaic Assemblage, Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 23:2, pp. 263-288.
8. 2001 Modern or Prehistoric: Experiments in Distinguishing Between Culturally and Mechanically Produced Chipped Stone Artifacts, North American Archaeologist, 22:3, pp. 231-258.
9. BRADBURY, ANDREW P. and PHILIP J. CARR 1995 Flake Typologies and Alternative Approaches: An Experimental Assessment, Lithic Technology, 20:2, pp. 100-116.
10. 1999 Examining Stage and Continuum Models of Flake Debris Analysis: An Experimental Approach, Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, pp. 105-116.
11. BRADBURY, ANDREW P. and JAY D. FRANKLIN 2000 Raw Material Variability, Package Size and Mass Analysis, Lithic Technology, 25:1, pp. 42-58.
12. CARR, PHILIP J. 1994 Technological Organization and Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherer Mobility: Examination of the Hayes Site, in The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies, International Monographs in Prehistory, Archaeological Series 7. Ann Arbor, MI.
13. 1995 Hunter-Gatherers, Mobility, and Technological Organization: The Early Archaic of East Tennessee, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
14. CARR, PHILIP J. and ANDREW P. BRADBURY 2000 Contemporary Lithic Analysis and Southeastern Archaeology, Southeastern Archaeology, 19:2, pp. 120-134.
15. 2001 Flake Debris Analysis, Levels of Production and the Organization of Technology, in Lithic Debitage Analysis: Context, Form, Meaning, W. Andrefsky, Jr. (ed.), The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 126-146.
16. 2003 Simulating Archaic Stone Toolkits and Types, paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina.
17. 2004 Exploring Mass Analysis, Screens, and Attributes, in Aggregate Analyses in Chipped Stone, C. T. Hall and M. L. Larson (eds.), University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 21-44.
18. INGBAR, ERIC E., MARY LOU LARSON, and BRUCE A. BRADLEY 1989 A Nontypological Approach to Debitage Analysis, in Experiments in Lithic Technology, D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin (eds.), BAR International Series 528, Great Britain, pp. 117-136.
19. JOHNSON, JAY K. 2001 Some Reflections on Debitage Analysis, in Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, William Andrefsky (ed.), The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 15-20.
20. KUITJ, IAN, WILLIAM C. PRENTISS, and DAVID L. POKOTYLO 1995 Bipolar Reduction: An Experimental Study of Debitage Variability, Lithic Technology, 20, pp. 100-115.
21. MAGNE, MARTIN P. R. 1985 Lithics and Livelihood: Stone Tool Technologies of Central and Southern Interior B.C., Archaeology Survey of Canada, Mercury Series 133, Ottawa, ON.
22. 2001 Debitage Analysis as a Scientific Tool for Archaeological Knowledge, in Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, William Andrefsky (ed.), The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 21-31.
23. MAULDIN, RAYMOND P. and DANIEL S. AMICK 1989 Investigating Patterning in Debitage from Experimental Bifacial Core Reduction, in Experiments in Lithic Technology, D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin (eds.), BAR International Series 528, Great Britain, pp. 89-100.
24. ODELL, GEORGE H. 1989 Experiments in Lithic Reduction, in Experiments in Lithic Technology, D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin (eds.), BAR International Series 528, Great Britain, pp. 163-198.
25. PRENTISS, WILLIAM C. 1998 The Reliability and Validity of a Lithic Debitage Typology: Implications for Archaeological Interpretation, American Antiquity, 63, pp. 635-650.
26. PRENTISS, WILLIAM C. and EUGENE J. ROMANSKI 1989 Experimental Evaluation of Sullivan and Rozen's Debitage Typology, in Experiments in Lithic Technology, D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin (eds.), BAR International Series 528, Oxford, pp. 89-100.
27. SHOTT, MICHAEL J. 1996 Stage Versus Continuum in the Debris Assemblage from Production of a Fluted Biface, Lithic Technology, 21, pp. 6-22.
28. SULLIVAN, ALAN P. and KENNETH C. ROZEN 1985 Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation, American Antiquity, 50, pp. 755-779.
29. TOMKA, STEVEN A. 1989 Differentiating Lithic Reduction Techniques: An Experimental Approach, in Experiments in Lithic Technology, D. S. Amick and R. P. Mauldin (eds.), BAR International Series 528, Great Britain, pp. 137-162.